Coolant Bypass Modification
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Coolant Bypass Modification
Has anyone does this before? It's when you remove the radiator fluid lines from the throttle body and connect them together to avoid the air heating up.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Yes, it's as simple as that. It's nothing you would notice but it all adds up if you do other heat reducing mods as well.
Some people remove the coolant to the fast idle thermo valve as well.
Some people remove the coolant to the fast idle thermo valve as well.
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Xsi)
So, I got to looking at my 96 civic ex... the coolant line comes from the main feed and goes to the TB, and then leaves the TB and goes a little to the right to this other thing - Is that the fast idle thermo valve? and that line goes underneath the intake manifold - I couldn't trace it very well as the engine was nice and hot... but, its gotta end up somewhere around there.
So, I could just find the beginning line off the main feed and hook that up to where it feeds back into the main line, right? what about the lines on the TB and thermo valve? Do people leave the lines off? Or just put a line going from the TB back to the TB? so, as to prevent dust/dirt/etc?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes, it's as simple as that. It's nothing you would notice but it all adds up if you do other heat reducing mods as well.
Some people remove the coolant to the fast idle thermo valve as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
So, I could just find the beginning line off the main feed and hook that up to where it feeds back into the main line, right? what about the lines on the TB and thermo valve? Do people leave the lines off? Or just put a line going from the TB back to the TB? so, as to prevent dust/dirt/etc?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes, it's as simple as that. It's nothing you would notice but it all adds up if you do other heat reducing mods as well.
Some people remove the coolant to the fast idle thermo valve as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
#6
Honda-Tech Member
I don't have a digicam, do you guys have a pic of your tb I could edit? I'm presuming it's the same as mine.
You can either just unplug the TB coolant lines and join them together or you can do a complete bypass an take the FITV out as well.
You can either just unplug the TB coolant lines and join them together or you can do a complete bypass an take the FITV out as well.
The following users liked this post:
#7
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Xsi)
I figured I'd bypass them both... I can easily see all connections from the main line -> tb -> tb -> FITV -> ???? I cant see where the last connection is... it runs somewhere under the intake manifold. I'm about to just pickup a couple feet of hose (is it a standard size?) and a handful of plugs (again, is there a standard size?) and just wait til the motor is cool and try to fanagle that thing in there... i can take pics whenever i tackle the job... or i'll take pics later if i can remember.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't have a digicam, do you guys have a pic of your tb I could edit? I'm presuming it's the same as mine.
You can either just unplug the TB coolant lines and join them together or you can do a complete bypass an take the FITV out as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't have a digicam, do you guys have a pic of your tb I could edit? I'm presuming it's the same as mine.
You can either just unplug the TB coolant lines and join them together or you can do a complete bypass an take the FITV out as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (supadupamikey)
well, i hit napa and picked up 3' of 5/16" heater hose... Im hoping thats what size it is. It looked like the right size... I also picked up a pack of 5/16" vacuum plugs. I went out to the civic to trace down where the line from the FITV goes back to... and its way back towards the engine block... and its kind of an awkward place to reach... especially with my broken hand... it looks to be easier if i could get underneath the car, but, i dont have anyway to do that here... so, i just threw the stuff in the trunk and i'll deal with it later.
#9
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (supadupamikey)
Ok... so im thinking...
Why even buy the hose?? Why not just buy 6 plugs and plug everything off?
Rather than having this hose that just drapes in the engine bay, why not just stick a plug on each end and some type of clamp and voila.
this will clean up the engine bay a bit too
dangit... my pack of plugs only has 5 in there... i need one more... doh!
Why even buy the hose?? Why not just buy 6 plugs and plug everything off?
Rather than having this hose that just drapes in the engine bay, why not just stick a plug on each end and some type of clamp and voila.
this will clean up the engine bay a bit too
dangit... my pack of plugs only has 5 in there... i need one more... doh!
#11
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Xsi)
I'm not sure if we're understanding each other...
People are bypassing the coolant lines to both sides of the throttle body, and capping the throttle body connections... and then some people bypass the lines to the fast idle thermo valve and then cap off the connections on the FITV as well... so, essentially, there would be a coolant line going from the main line (whatever its called), back to itself, just like 18-20" down on the main feed. so, why not just cap off both those connections as well and eliminate the line... unless im missing something... ??
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Because you still need coolant to flow through the idle air control valve or else it won't idle.</TD></TR></TABLE>
People are bypassing the coolant lines to both sides of the throttle body, and capping the throttle body connections... and then some people bypass the lines to the fast idle thermo valve and then cap off the connections on the FITV as well... so, essentially, there would be a coolant line going from the main line (whatever its called), back to itself, just like 18-20" down on the main feed. so, why not just cap off both those connections as well and eliminate the line... unless im missing something... ??
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Because you still need coolant to flow through the idle air control valve or else it won't idle.</TD></TR></TABLE>
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (supadupamikey)
Ive had it done when I first did my Y8 mani swap...when the car is cold the idle jumps up and down like 200-300 rpms...did'nt notice a damn thing other than that.
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (supadupamikey)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by supadupamikey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm not sure if we're understanding each other...
People are bypassing the coolant lines to both sides of the throttle body, and capping the throttle body connections... and then some people bypass the lines to the fast idle thermo valve and then cap off the connections on the FITV as well... so, essentially, there would be a coolant line going from the main line (whatever its called), back to itself, just like 18-20" down on the main feed. so, why not just cap off both those connections as well and eliminate the line... unless im missing something... ??
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You need at least two coolant lines running through the engine bay if you are keeping the IACV, one running from the spigot on the head to the IACV and one running from the IACV to the spigot on the steel pipe which leads to the water pump.
If you are eliminating the IACV as well as the FITV then you can cap off everything but you still need a hose running from the spigot on the steel pipe to the nipple on the intake manifold in order for the coolant to circulate properly.
Thats with a B16 anyway, haven't worked on a D series personally so don't know if it's the same.
Tee hee, I said nipple
People are bypassing the coolant lines to both sides of the throttle body, and capping the throttle body connections... and then some people bypass the lines to the fast idle thermo valve and then cap off the connections on the FITV as well... so, essentially, there would be a coolant line going from the main line (whatever its called), back to itself, just like 18-20" down on the main feed. so, why not just cap off both those connections as well and eliminate the line... unless im missing something... ??
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You need at least two coolant lines running through the engine bay if you are keeping the IACV, one running from the spigot on the head to the IACV and one running from the IACV to the spigot on the steel pipe which leads to the water pump.
If you are eliminating the IACV as well as the FITV then you can cap off everything but you still need a hose running from the spigot on the steel pipe to the nipple on the intake manifold in order for the coolant to circulate properly.
Thats with a B16 anyway, haven't worked on a D series personally so don't know if it's the same.
Tee hee, I said nipple
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cape Coral, FL, USA
Posts: 742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Xsi)
i've got nipples focker... can you milk me??
ok... i see what you're saying...
damn... i wish i had a set of shop manuals (for this car anyways)... so, i could "see" everything
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You need at least two coolant lines running through the engine bay if you are keeping the IACV, one running from the spigot on the head to the IACV and one running from the IACV to the spigot on the steel pipe which leads to the water pump.
If you are eliminating the IACV as well as the FITV then you can cap off everything but you still need a hose running from the spigot on the steel pipe to the nipple on the intake manifold in order for the coolant to circulate properly.
Thats with a B16 anyway, haven't worked on a D series personally so don't know if it's the same.
Tee hee, I said nipple</TD></TR></TABLE>
ok... i see what you're saying...
damn... i wish i had a set of shop manuals (for this car anyways)... so, i could "see" everything
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You need at least two coolant lines running through the engine bay if you are keeping the IACV, one running from the spigot on the head to the IACV and one running from the IACV to the spigot on the steel pipe which leads to the water pump.
If you are eliminating the IACV as well as the FITV then you can cap off everything but you still need a hose running from the spigot on the steel pipe to the nipple on the intake manifold in order for the coolant to circulate properly.
Thats with a B16 anyway, haven't worked on a D series personally so don't know if it's the same.
Tee hee, I said nipple</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LSej1
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
1
09-04-2017 09:45 PM
igo4bmx
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
8
04-08-2004 07:25 PM