Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Civic LCA vs ITR LCA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2003, 02:18 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
nikolai.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Civic LCA vs ITR LCA

If you had the choice of getting a shock that would bold up to your EG LCA's or get ITR shocks and ITR control arms for a little bit more, which would you get and why? I am NOT interested in bling factor or "the ITR is better cause its for an ITR" kind of BS. Practicallity is my main consideration here. This will be for a road course set up and spring rates will be in the area of 400-600 lbs/in. I wont mind spending the extra money on the ITR shocks and control arms is its justifyable. If you had civic control arms and they broke, which made you upgrade to ITR arms, I'd really like to hear about your experience. Thanks alot guys.
Old 11-10-2003, 02:21 PM
  #2  
 
MaxSterling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alhambra, CA, 91801
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (NB)

the only reason why you would get itr lca is b/c you want to by coilovers for made ONLY for itr, like teins HA. Otherwise you are just wasting money.
Old 11-10-2003, 02:24 PM
  #3  
 
=GAME='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: You Dont Want nO Problem in New Hoeleans
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (RoyFokker)

yea dont waste your money on itr shocks and lca. if you factory one broke, find a set of integra lca with the sway mount. as for springs just order some custom rate from eibach.
Old 11-10-2003, 02:29 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
nikolai.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

for reference, im looking into the JIC FLTARS. So I have the choice of either civic shocks or ITR shocks. But you guys are basically agreeing with my assumption that the ITR shock is a waste of money.
Old 11-10-2003, 02:31 PM
  #5  
 
skribblah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: EJ2 type DX number 511,096
Posts: 1,296
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (NB)

because it aint a tight car if it aint a type R! ;p
Old 11-10-2003, 03:01 PM
  #6  
Boba Connoisseur
 
SkyeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: 925
Posts: 4,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (NB)

A stock ITR shock is more stiffly valved than say a GSR shock, but can not take 400-600lb springs for any long length of time.

The ITR LCA is way better than a stock Civic LCA, has a swaybar attachment, and can be had for <$100. Half the price of those purple blinger items everyone has a boner for.

You can get Konis in an ITR fitment, as well as Bilsteins, both of which can take the 400-600lbs you plan on running. (also most of the "jdm" suspension folks make ITR fitments)

*shrug*
Old 11-10-2003, 03:10 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
R you serious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: japizona
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (RoyFokker)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RoyFokker &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the only reason why you would get itr lca is b/c you want to by coilovers for made ONLY for itr, like teins HA. Otherwise you are just wasting money. </TD></TR></TABLE>
what if he wanted better bushing, thicker lca's and and all around more stronger set up in the rear?
btw if everone thinks that itr control are just for bling then why did these control arms come stock on sir's in every other country?
Old 11-10-2003, 03:16 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
nikolai.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (SkyeC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SkyeC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A stock ITR shock is more stiffly valved than say a GSR shock, but can not take 400-600lb springs for any long length of time.

The ITR LCA is way better than a stock Civic LCA, has a swaybar attachment, and can be had for &lt;$100. Half the price of those purple blinger items everyone has a boner for.

You can get Konis in an ITR fitment, as well as Bilsteins, both of which can take the 400-600lbs you plan on running. (also most of the "jdm" suspension folks make ITR fitments)

*shrug*</TD></TR></TABLE>

I am getting JIC coilovers. There is no way im putting springs like that on my stock shocks.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by R you serious &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
what if he wanted better bushing, thicker lca's and and all around more stronger set up in the rear?
btw if everone thinks that itr control are just for bling then why did these control arms come stock on sir's in every other country?</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is exactly what i am trying to get answered. I wanna know if its really necessary/practical to upgrade to ITR pieces.
Old 11-10-2003, 03:54 PM
  #9  
Boba Connoisseur
 
SkyeC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: 925
Posts: 4,546
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA (NB)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NB &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I am getting JIC coilovers. There is no way im putting springs like that on my stock shocks.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Ok... so get some SRRs or ITRs. the stockers suck.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
s13hero
Acura Integra Type-R
1
04-19-2010 09:26 AM
8o8da9speed
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
11-18-2004 05:20 AM
LudeToAHatch
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
07-02-2003 06:52 AM
The G2 Racer
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
02-10-2003 12:31 PM
fuguman
Acura Integra
4
08-27-2002 02:04 PM



Quick Reply: Civic LCA vs ITR LCA



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:29 PM.