cable vs hydraulic
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL, usa
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cable vs hydraulic
whats the difference between the two clutches... is one better or is just cause the hydraulic one is easier to use? any performance differences?
#2
Re: cable vs hydraulic (toda4ek)
its actually two diff types of trannys. cable was the old way for the tranny to shift gears [like 0bd-0] while hydro uses fluid to engage/disengage the TOB in the tranny
#3
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: racine, Wi, usa
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: cable vs hydraulic (toda4ek)
Clutch wise there the same. There is NO differece between them.
Hydro: Uses a hydrolic cylinder to push the clutch in and out.
Cable: Usses cables instead.
I think the only real difference is the Hydro is easier to push in when you upgrade your clutch to a higher performance one over stock because of the slight power assist. (SLIGHT)
Cable is just a little more effort.
Now on the tranny itself.
Cable: Uses i belive 2 cables to shift the internal gears. Shifter is bolted to the floorboard and dosent stick out the botem of your car. No performance gains in my opinion just the old way of doing things. i belive they went away from this setup because of cables breaking fraying seizing, ext and messing up the transmissions if you were a dumb ***.
Newer ones: i dont know what the technical term is but theres basicly two pipes connecting the shifter to the tranny. One is just to keep the spacing absolute (the engine can and will shift while driving) and the other shifts the car in respect to the shifter. The shifter is bolted to a plate on the spacer tube mounted thro the floor board. with the linkage connected to the shifter when the engine moves the whole plate would move with the engine as needed to keep the distance exact.
Cable trannys dident need that obviously. i really dont see any befits over one or the other.
Hydro: Uses a hydrolic cylinder to push the clutch in and out.
Cable: Usses cables instead.
I think the only real difference is the Hydro is easier to push in when you upgrade your clutch to a higher performance one over stock because of the slight power assist. (SLIGHT)
Cable is just a little more effort.
Now on the tranny itself.
Cable: Uses i belive 2 cables to shift the internal gears. Shifter is bolted to the floorboard and dosent stick out the botem of your car. No performance gains in my opinion just the old way of doing things. i belive they went away from this setup because of cables breaking fraying seizing, ext and messing up the transmissions if you were a dumb ***.
Newer ones: i dont know what the technical term is but theres basicly two pipes connecting the shifter to the tranny. One is just to keep the spacing absolute (the engine can and will shift while driving) and the other shifts the car in respect to the shifter. The shifter is bolted to a plate on the spacer tube mounted thro the floor board. with the linkage connected to the shifter when the engine moves the whole plate would move with the engine as needed to keep the distance exact.
Cable trannys dident need that obviously. i really dont see any befits over one or the other.
#4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicago, IL, usa
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: cable vs hydraulic (nocternaldragon)
thanks... you can just bolt on a hydro tranny to a B-series motor that came with a cable tranny... right? or am i totally wrong.. lol idk help me out
#5
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: home of the SNAKE and mark hammel
Posts: 2,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: cable vs hydraulic (toda4ek)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by toda4ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thanks... you can just bolt on a hydro tranny to a B-series motor that came with a cable tranny... right? or am i totally wrong.. lol idk help me out</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes you can. all b-series transmisions are interchangable on all b-series motors. b20 tranny wont work in a front wheel drive car though.
yes you can. all b-series transmisions are interchangable on all b-series motors. b20 tranny wont work in a front wheel drive car though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lilo_goki
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
13
05-09-2007 10:34 AM
SnowSurfer
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
06-15-2005 01:57 PM
ldanphanl
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
03-06-2005 08:50 PM
Faust
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
2
08-09-2002 06:45 AM