IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 4o8 ej6, CA
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX
well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 3,529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (sky9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sky9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What? The tach is just a display, it doesn't directly effect rpm.
What? The tach is just a display, it doesn't directly effect rpm.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (sky9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sky9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What the expletive are you talking about?
If you're inferring that because the CX/DX don't have tachs they don't have a redline you're sadly mistaken.
Their redline is LOWER than the EX's.
If that's not what you're asking then I have no idea.
What the expletive are you talking about?
If you're inferring that because the CX/DX don't have tachs they don't have a redline you're sadly mistaken.
Their redline is LOWER than the EX's.
If that's not what you're asking then I have no idea.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 4o8 ej6, CA
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
96+ Civic CX
96+ Civic DX
96+ Civic LX D16Y7 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC
9.4:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
106 bhp @ 6200
Redline: 7100 rpm 103 lb-ft @ 4600
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
96+ Civic HX D16Y 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC VTEC-E
9.4:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
115 bhp @ 6200
Redline: 7100 rpm 104 lb-ft @ 5400
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
96+ Civic EX
(EJ8) D16Y8 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC VTEC-II
9.6:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
127 bhp @ 6600
Redline: 7200 rpm 107 lb-ft @ 5500
96+ Civic DX
96+ Civic LX D16Y7 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC
9.4:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
106 bhp @ 6200
Redline: 7100 rpm 103 lb-ft @ 4600
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
96+ Civic HX D16Y 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC VTEC-E
9.4:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
115 bhp @ 6200
Redline: 7100 rpm 104 lb-ft @ 5400
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
96+ Civic EX
(EJ8) D16Y8 1590cc
4 cyl, 16 valve
SOHC VTEC-II
9.6:1 c.r.
PGM-FI (MPFI)
127 bhp @ 6600
Redline: 7200 rpm 107 lb-ft @ 5500
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (sky9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sky9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.</TD></TR></TABLE>
bwahahahahahah
are you drunk????
bwahahahahahah
are you drunk????
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (thehatchninja)
I think the OP believes that having a tach causes a greater likelihood of the driver bouncing off the rev limiter more often.
I think the OP needs to realize that not every driver is 16 years old. And 16 year olds will often abuse their engines, whether it has a tach or not.
I destroyed my mom's rear diff when I was 17 by doing a neutral drop with a full load of passengers. Simple physics pwned me, and that beast didn't have a tach.
I think the OP needs to realize that not every driver is 16 years old. And 16 year olds will often abuse their engines, whether it has a tach or not.
I destroyed my mom's rear diff when I was 17 by doing a neutral drop with a full load of passengers. Simple physics pwned me, and that beast didn't have a tach.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: CR80 Powered T7, CA, USA
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (96civb18c1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96civb18c1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no, ex has vtec, so it allows it to rev higher because of its better efficiency.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh please explain this....
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh please explain this....
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Esko, MN, USA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Mario_D)
This is a weird thread. If you don't want to rev, buy a VX. The have obscenely long gears, plus they have tachs, plus they are wired/have VTEC-E. You're all set now!
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (sky9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sky9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.</TD></TR></TABLE>
ahhh my head hurts now!
ahhh my head hurts now!
#14
Junior Member
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (sky9)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sky9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well it seem to me that the CX/DX modle is better to buy, because the car doesnt come with a tach, there for its never being rev high. but on the EX with comes witht a Tach therefore the engine could be reving alot.</TD></TR></TABLE>
what... the... hell...
I don't know what's worse; your logic or your spelling and grammar.
what... the... hell...
I don't know what's worse; your logic or your spelling and grammar.
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (reaper2022)
Most people will buy a Cx/DX for their lighter weights, I have a DX & wish that I had a higher trim for the sunroof & power options.
Thinking that just because the CX/DX don't have tachs = people won't rev as high is a little de da dee IMO. People will drive anyway they want to sans tach or not.
Thinking that just because the CX/DX don't have tachs = people won't rev as high is a little de da dee IMO. People will drive anyway they want to sans tach or not.
#19
HT White Ops
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: I see what you did there.
Posts: 16,222
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (bpkmrtoes)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bpkmrtoes »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol bad drivers probably redline the **** out of them cuhz it has no tach</TD></TR></TABLE>
Horrible misconception. Most people will tend to drive more normally without a tach because the engine gets loud way before redline.
Horrible misconception. Most people will tend to drive more normally without a tach because the engine gets loud way before redline.
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Rochester, New York -> Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 10,443
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (Eran)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 96civb18c1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">no, ex has vtec, so it allows it to rev higher because of its better efficiency.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually it just has to do with the way the engine's assembled.
VTEC doesn't give you a higher redline, sorry .
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually it just has to do with the way the engine's assembled.
VTEC doesn't give you a higher redline, sorry .
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: IS Buying an CX-DX is Better then a EX (Syndacate)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Syndacate »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Actually it just has to do with the way the engine's assembled.
VTEC doesn't give you a higher redline, sorry .</TD></TR></TABLE>
The components used i.e. cam, springs, retainers, ecu etc will dictate the redline not whether it is vtec or not.
Actually it just has to do with the way the engine's assembled.
VTEC doesn't give you a higher redline, sorry .</TD></TR></TABLE>
The components used i.e. cam, springs, retainers, ecu etc will dictate the redline not whether it is vtec or not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
imzjustplayin
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
26
04-04-2008 02:24 PM
civickidd99
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
09-16-2003 07:51 AM