Bolt-ons for 1.6L SOHC
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: DFW, TX, USA
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bolt-ons for 1.6L SOHC
Well my car has been paid of for quite some time now and this is the time I told my self I would upgrade some of my engine components. I know I could do a swap but I am not interested then that now, but I am not opposed to a VTEC head swap. Have any of you done this and if so what did you do?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SOHC4life 96)
Honestly, a mini me is a waste IMHO. Ask BauleyCivic. He did a huge writeup on it here, and he was more than dissapointed. Either save your money and drive it like it is, or boost it. Those are the only two real choices I'd say. Bolt ons you spend a ton of money to be noticed and not be any faster.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Littleton, Co
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ricey McRicerton)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Bolt ons you spend a ton of money to be noticed and not be any faster.</TD></TR></TABLE>
my butt dyno tells me otherwise , but seriously yea...i regret modding my d16z6 with bolt ons...spent way too much for such little gains.
my butt dyno tells me otherwise , but seriously yea...i regret modding my d16z6 with bolt ons...spent way too much for such little gains.
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WongFeihung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WongFeihung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
my butt dyno tells me otherwise , but seriously yea...i regret modding my d16z6 with bolt ons...spent way too much for such little gains. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Don't worry, I did the same thing. Home PnP job, portmatched and ported y8 intake mani, AEM ITR 3 inch CAI, DC 4-2-1, the works. Huge waste of time and money. I wish I'd gone straight to a turbo setup or just let the money make more money for me.
my butt dyno tells me otherwise , but seriously yea...i regret modding my d16z6 with bolt ons...spent way too much for such little gains. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Don't worry, I did the same thing. Home PnP job, portmatched and ported y8 intake mani, AEM ITR 3 inch CAI, DC 4-2-1, the works. Huge waste of time and money. I wish I'd gone straight to a turbo setup or just let the money make more money for me.
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Ricey McRicerton)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Don't worry, I did the same thing. Home PnP job, portmatched and ported y8 intake mani, AEM ITR 3 inch CAI, DC 4-2-1, the works. Huge waste of time and money. I wish I'd gone straight to a turbo setup or just let the money make more money for me. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I understand completely, except I sourced all my components for next to nothing.
The boost will return to the mini-me at a future date....
Don't worry, I did the same thing. Home PnP job, portmatched and ported y8 intake mani, AEM ITR 3 inch CAI, DC 4-2-1, the works. Huge waste of time and money. I wish I'd gone straight to a turbo setup or just let the money make more money for me. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I understand completely, except I sourced all my components for next to nothing.
The boost will return to the mini-me at a future date....
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: DFW, TX, USA
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, I appreciate the honest opinions. I am leaning that way too but I just needed to ask. Swaps are getting more inexspensive. As far as boosting it goes I think I rather do a swap.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Littleton, Co
Posts: 4,789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Zumo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Zumo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">As far as boosting it goes I think I rather do a swap. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yea...there are people that can handle the turbo as far as maintenance, but I look for reliability and less maintenance of an na too.
yea...there are people that can handle the turbo as far as maintenance, but I look for reliability and less maintenance of an na too.
#12
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: The City Of Destiny, WA
Posts: 5,240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (WongFeihung)
I'd have to agree just go straight to the boost setup ...
I'm running a mini-me w/ I/H/E & it's not the greatest but i guess it's came a long way from the B7 ... but i do think the mini-me let me down some but for a total 500 invested in my motor i guess i can't complain ... but go boost !
I'm running a mini-me w/ I/H/E & it's not the greatest but i guess it's came a long way from the B7 ... but i do think the mini-me let me down some but for a total 500 invested in my motor i guess i can't complain ... but go boost !
#13
Re: (eg8kid)
i kinda agree with everybody else you really can't get alot of horsepower out of a sohc engine with simple bolt on parts, do the the turbo. i my self have a 00' civic ex which has the d16y8 and i did a injen CAI, DC sport header thermal cat back exhaust and a B&M shifter and i droped 1.3 seconds of my 1/4 mile time. but now that i have had that on the car for a few months now im ready for more power so im lookin into the edelbrock turbo kit. good luck with your project
#14
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Somewhere to anywhere, Ca
Posts: 4,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
3 Posts
Re: (00supercivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WongFeihung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea...there are people that can handle the turbo as far as maintenance, but I look for reliability and less maintenance of an na too. </TD></TR></TABLE>
NA set-ups aren't any more reliable than turbo set-ups. If the NA engine has been tuned fairly half assed and the turbo engine was tuned well, the Turbo will be much more reliable. Yes the turbo has a little bit more stuff in the engine bay, hence a little more maintance (only if something brakes). But tuning is key with any built engine.
NA set-ups aren't any more reliable than turbo set-ups. If the NA engine has been tuned fairly half assed and the turbo engine was tuned well, the Turbo will be much more reliable. Yes the turbo has a little bit more stuff in the engine bay, hence a little more maintance (only if something brakes). But tuning is key with any built engine.
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (WongFeihung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WongFeihung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yea...there are people that can handle the turbo as far as maintenance, but I look for reliability and less maintenance of an na too. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Why isn't a turbo reliable?
My car has almost 104k miles on it, and the turbo kit has been on for almost 34k miles now. Two years being boosted!
You wont get 175whp on a B series swap, and I can turn up the boost to get 200-210 whp, but I need to fix my ignitor in the dizzy, as mine is now shot.
yea...there are people that can handle the turbo as far as maintenance, but I look for reliability and less maintenance of an na too. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Why isn't a turbo reliable?
My car has almost 104k miles on it, and the turbo kit has been on for almost 34k miles now. Two years being boosted!
You wont get 175whp on a B series swap, and I can turn up the boost to get 200-210 whp, but I need to fix my ignitor in the dizzy, as mine is now shot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SOHCsleeper
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
32
06-05-2005 09:50 AM
mr twig
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
47
05-26-2005 11:21 AM