Best Head for Integ Bottom
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Saratoga, NY, USA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Best Head for Integ Bottom
What head would be better for the LS vtec swap, would GSR work or Type R????
I have 99 LS Integ Bottom end..
right now i have B16a..(which i put on for the hell of it)
Thanks For the help guys
I have 99 LS Integ Bottom end..
right now i have B16a..(which i put on for the hell of it)
Thanks For the help guys
#2
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (vtec232)
wrong forum first off. just for future reference. anyway...
b16 head is better that the gsr. the only real advantage for the gsr head is the quench in the combustion chambers, but if you ever go turbo you don't want that anyway. but the b16 head flows better, and obviously the type r is best being a b16 head with a factory port job more or less
b16 head is better that the gsr. the only real advantage for the gsr head is the quench in the combustion chambers, but if you ever go turbo you don't want that anyway. but the b16 head flows better, and obviously the type r is best being a b16 head with a factory port job more or less
#3
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Back in Chico...., Ca, United States
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (littlegreenb18)
actually both the gsr and b16 heads flow almost the same, the gsr will yield higher compression
#5
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CAPITAL CITY Tallahassee D.S., Florida, U.S.A
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (vtec232)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtec232 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What head would be better for the LS vtec swap, would GSR work or Type R????
I have 99 LS Integ Bottom end..
right now i have B16a..(which i put on for the hell of it)
Thanks For the help guys </TD></TR></TABLE> keep your b16 head
I have 99 LS Integ Bottom end..
right now i have B16a..(which i put on for the hell of it)
Thanks For the help guys </TD></TR></TABLE> keep your b16 head
#7
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (doood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">https://honda-tech.com/zerosearch
it's not there just to take up space</TD></TR></TABLE>
seriously
it's not there just to take up space</TD></TR></TABLE>
seriously
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: CAPITAL CITY Tallahassee D.S., Florida, U.S.A
Posts: 2,368
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (vtec232)
guy keep your head boost or not the $ for another one that's going to make a *** hair difference could be put into the b16
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: That's the wrong tone... I'm Skunk2 certified.
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
if you plan on building up the head (porting and polishing), don't get a type r. it's very easy to take out too much material from a type r head when doing port work.
compared to a type r head, getting a b16 or gsr head ported out instead will often yield better results and more power.
compared to a type r head, getting a b16 or gsr head ported out instead will often yield better results and more power.
#12
be professional
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (hatch96y7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatch96y7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ur an idiot the b16 has the best flow out of the b series engines</TD></TR></TABLE>
Care to back up your claims with a flow bench chart? I want to see if you actually do have a clue what you're talking about, or if you're just repeating crap that you've read on the internet.
I happen to have flow bench charts of both the PR3 and P72 heads right here . . .
Care to back up your claims with a flow bench chart? I want to see if you actually do have a clue what you're talking about, or if you're just repeating crap that you've read on the internet.
I happen to have flow bench charts of both the PR3 and P72 heads right here . . .
#14
be professional
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (hatch96y7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatch96y7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have seen flow charts and b16 are the best </TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh? So "B16 are the best" specifically? Not the PR3 in general?
Care to post those flow bench charts for us and explain exactly why? I'm ready to learn.
Oh? So "B16 are the best" specifically? Not the PR3 in general?
Care to post those flow bench charts for us and explain exactly why? I'm ready to learn.
#15
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: valdese, nc, 28690
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (Targa250R)
for an n/a application the gsr is probably the best choice. it has slightly better compression the cams are better than the stock b16 cams. once upgraded, the question becomes a little more difficult. For a turbo app, the b16 is your best choice. it out flows the gsr and it has a lower natural compression ratio. for an N/A application, flow is a LITTLE less important, and the compression is a little more important.
#16
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
Re: Best Head for Integ Bottom (cwf1988)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatch96y7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have seen flow charts and b16 are the best </TD></TR></TABLE>
where are these flowcharts you speak of?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cwf1988 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for an n/a application the gsr is probably the best choice. it has slightly better compression the cams are better than the stock b16 cams. once upgraded, the question becomes a little more difficult. For a turbo app, the b16 is your best choice. it out flows the gsr and it has a lower natural compression ratio. for an N/A application, flow is a LITTLE less important, and the compression is a little more important.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
say what?
where are these flowcharts you speak of?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cwf1988 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for an n/a application the gsr is probably the best choice. it has slightly better compression the cams are better than the stock b16 cams. once upgraded, the question becomes a little more difficult. For a turbo app, the b16 is your best choice. it out flows the gsr and it has a lower natural compression ratio. for an N/A application, flow is a LITTLE less important, and the compression is a little more important.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
say what?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sosleepy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
17
08-14-2005 09:00 AM