Notices
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >>

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2004, 06:56 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
platinum00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >>

under the rear seats in a 2000 civic coupe there are 3 large heavy plates. I marked were they used to be.



Does this deal with any kind or support or body roll.

platinum.
Old 10-06-2004, 07:05 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hadehatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 892
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

There was a thread about this piece in Integras.. Try searching.. I think 97+ integras had this piece but 94-96 didn't..

Its used to lock the seat in but other than that Im not sure if it does anything else..
Old 10-06-2004, 07:10 PM
  #3  
 
dogfood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: saint clair shores, MI, USA
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

how much do those pieces weight, and do you know if the hatches have them?
Old 10-06-2004, 07:12 PM
  #4  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'll take a stab at it...

To support the rear passengers since IT IS a passenger vehicle. Hence, people = passengers.

If those pieces were not there, the seats would be on the floor and you'll feel like a midget back there.

I win a cookie!
Old 10-06-2004, 07:13 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
platinum00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (dogfood)

i have not weighed them, but there a decent amount.

maybe 30 lbs. all together.

anyone have any other weight reduction tips like this.

how much does the gas tank weight ? i might be getting a fuel cell ?

oh and what is the best way to get all the noise reduction stuff off the floor, HEAT GUN ?

platinum.

Old 10-06-2004, 07:15 PM
  #6  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Will this be a daily driven car or track car? If it's a track car, rip everything out you can think of that won't buckle the vehicle and call it a day.
Old 10-06-2004, 07:16 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Ricey McRicerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

I seem to remember those being for structural integrity....

Anybody wanna back me up on this?
Old 10-06-2004, 07:18 PM
  #8  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (Ricey McRicerton)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I seem to remember those being for structural integrity....

Anybody wanna back me up on this?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I would think they would be since it's a vital part on where the rear passengers sit. They wouldn't make a flimy piece where passengers sit only to save on weight and costs. If you remove that piece, I'd say the rear of the vehicle will flex on turns and maybe even on acceleration.

Here:

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=784426

Lots of ideas with your year vehicle/similar (EM1).
Old 10-06-2004, 07:20 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
pdiggitydogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Beware Of Perverts
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I also want to say its for structural integrity
Old 10-06-2004, 07:21 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Ricey McRicerton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (Dimi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dimi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I would think they would be since it's a vital part on where the rear passengers sit. They wouldn't make a flimy piece where passengers sit only to save on weight and costs. If you remove that piece, I'd say the rear of the vechile will flex on turns and maybe even on acceleration.

Here:

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=784426

Lots of ideas with your year vehicle/similar (EM1).</TD></TR></TABLE>

Exactly.
Old 10-06-2004, 07:25 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
platinum00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (Ricey McRicerton)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I seem to remember those being for structural integrity....

</TD></TR></TABLE>

anyone confirm this..

can i get a pillar bar to replace this or something lighter that will do the same for the car structuraly.

This is not a daily driver, and i dont plan on putting the back seats back in.
but I do alot of hard cornering and dont want to weakin the chasis.

platinum.



Modified by platinum00 at 11:36 PM 10/6/2004
Old 10-06-2004, 07:27 PM
  #12  
 
screech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: HUSTLE_TOWN, tx
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by platinum00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

oh and what is the best way to get all the noise reduction stuff off the floor, HEAT GUN ?

platinum.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

dry ice
Old 10-06-2004, 07:28 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Master23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St. Paul, MN, U.S. of A
Posts: 1,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by platinum00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have not weighed them, but there a decent amount.

maybe 30 lbs. all together.

anyone have any other weight reduction tips like this.

how much does the gas tank weight ? i might be getting a fuel cell ?

oh and what is the best way to get all the noise reduction stuff off the floor, HEAT GUN ?

platinum.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

To remove the noise reduction material on the floor I think your suppose to use dry ice. This will freeze the material and then you can just hammer it with a chisel.
Old 10-06-2004, 07:32 PM
  #14  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dry ice and a chisel to remove the tar.

As far as the pillar bar, those are 2 COMPLETELY different locations of the vehicle and COMPLETELY different stress points.

That piece right there, I can bet, stiffens the chassis under acceleration and cornering.

Think about it. All the rear momentum under acceleration places stress near the center to rear of the vehicle. Generally, in that area right there. If there was no structural integrity there, the floor would buckle in half under a hard launch and the chassis would drop like a "U".

The pillar bar (if the one I'm thinking about is correct) goes from one side of the vehicle to the other side. This is for body roll and chassis flex from cornering. This pillar, probably, has NOTHING to do with rear momentum and chassis rigity under acceleration or braking.

I'm not an Engineer (was into Mechanical Engineering). Just thinking about it in my head and picturing everything happening slowly.

Go here:

https://honda-tech.com/zeroforum?id=19

For chassis rigity questions and concearns (especially this one).
Old 10-06-2004, 07:37 PM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
platinum00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (Dimi)

thanks for the help,

stupid ?, but where do i get dry ice.

keep the comments coming.

platinum.


Modified by platinum00 at 11:55 PM 10/6/2004
Old 10-06-2004, 07:40 PM
  #16  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (platinum00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by platinum00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thanks for the help,

stupid ?, but where do i get dry ice.

keep the comments coming.

platinum.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Local grocery store should carry it. Cheap too. Break it to chunks, distribute among tar. Oce you see the tar start to crack, chisel away.
Old 10-06-2004, 08:29 PM
  #17  
Member
 
blaster834's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldnt remove it
Old 10-06-2004, 08:46 PM
  #18  
senior gold member
 
Ivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dont fake, the funk, earf
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

They are there in case you were to get t-boned. Its for safety, thats why they added them later. I know on some earlier cars like before 96 didn't have them.
Old 10-06-2004, 10:16 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HXvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Orlando y0
Posts: 1,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (Ivan)

i have the same thing in my car but i didnt take it out. try taking all the sound deadener from under the carpet and in your truck. its a good 20lbs but it might be a lot of work.
Old 10-06-2004, 11:42 PM
  #20  
 
civtegra_hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Mansfield, tx, USA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (platinum00)

if you want some whight reed. they why don't get get some fiber glass doors, and lexon windows all around and a one pice front end, don't start cutting **** you don't know will afect the car or not, if you do it would be too late if anything would happan and there goes your car, what' Im trying to say is Dont find out the hard way. it's not worth it, (with your car) do it the right way
Old 10-07-2004, 01:47 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
NXSpoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: New Port Nowhere, Florida, USA
Posts: 1,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (civtegra_hybrid)

Those pieces are there for structural integrity, like people have previously posted. If the car is anywhere near a daily driver, leave them in. Otherwise, the choice is yours.

Is weight that big a factor when it comes to the integrity of your car??
Old 10-07-2004, 02:34 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
sinister6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: A Little Isle in Pacific
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

personaly i wont stripe away those things with safty feature..
some ppl remove side beams and bumper support.. i would never do that
Old 10-07-2004, 04:07 AM
  #23  
 
jay.dee.em1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SPOOOOOON, NY, usa
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (sinister6)

if your gonna take it out i would at least get some sort of roll cage or have some lighter supports welded in
Old 10-07-2004, 05:05 AM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
platinum00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,826
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >> (Ivan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ivan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They are there in case you were to get t-boned. Its for safety, thats why they added them later. I know on some earlier cars like before 96 didn't have them.</TD></TR></TABLE>

if there not on the 92-95 models i would assume there for saftey and not body flex or roll.

im not worried about saftey, The car is rarley drivin on the street, and a cage might be in the works later anyway.

platinum.
Old 10-07-2004, 05:20 AM
  #25  
Electrician
 
Deemeetree's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Astoria, Queens,, Zoo York City, U.S.A.
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's up to you man. There's plenty of other ways to reduce weight.

I rather do it this way:

Since I'm not going to remove this 20 lb. chunk of metal, I'm going to add 10 more horsepower with engine modifications. See where I'm going?


Quick Reply: Is it bad if i removed this for weight reduction >>



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:17 AM.