b16a semi-built vs. jdm b18c-r
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Disney Land, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
b16a semi-built vs. jdm b18c-r
jdm stock bottom end with b18 crank
jdm b16a head
itr intake manifold
itr exhaust manifold
jdm b16a tranny
VS.
jdm itr b18cr
would changing the crank of a b16a and intake and exhaust manifold compare anywhere near a b18cr?
how can you make a b16a become a stock itr b18c-r?
jdm b16a head
itr intake manifold
itr exhaust manifold
jdm b16a tranny
VS.
jdm itr b18cr
would changing the crank of a b16a and intake and exhaust manifold compare anywhere near a b18cr?
how can you make a b16a become a stock itr b18c-r?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Re: b16a semi-built vs. jdm b18c-r (Rice Is Best)
poormans type R is a b18 bottom (either LS, or GSR) and B16 head.
You wont get the B18 torque with a B16 unless you go FI.
You wont get the B18 torque with a B16 unless you go FI.
#5
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Disney Land, CA
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: b16a semi-built vs. jdm b18c-r (Luserkid)
yea but im sure just by changing the b16 crank to the b18 crank, it turns out to be a b18.
so b16 block
b18 crank
b16 head
type r IM
type r EM
b16 tranny
all those should make a type r right?
so b16 block
b18 crank
b16 head
type r IM
type r EM
b16 tranny
all those should make a type r right?
Trending Topics
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (egsleepercivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by egsleepercivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think if you put a b18 crankshaft into a B16a that your pistons would smash into the head, someone correct me if I am wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
I believe you are 100% correct.
B16 stroke = 77.5
B18 stroke = 87.2
It would be alot easier just to get a B18 bottom end. Whats wrong with doing that?
I believe you are 100% correct.
B16 stroke = 77.5
B18 stroke = 87.2
It would be alot easier just to get a B18 bottom end. Whats wrong with doing that?
#11
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (egsleepercivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by egsleepercivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think if you put a b18 crankshaft into a B16a that your pistons would smash into the head, someone correct me if I am wrong</TD></TR></TABLE>
This is correct, but if you do a search in the all motor forum, you'll see a couple people that have done just what you're asking about. If you put a B18c crank and rods into a B16a block, you'll need some custom made shorter pistons which are available specifically for this setup and you can have a B18c in a B16 block. The only real advantage to doing this is the sleeper effect. I've seen a 2.0L configuration like this in a B16 block and head setup so when you lift your hood, everyone thinks you only have a B16 engine in there.
Modified by 00Red_SiR at 11:32 PM 2/13/2005
This is correct, but if you do a search in the all motor forum, you'll see a couple people that have done just what you're asking about. If you put a B18c crank and rods into a B16a block, you'll need some custom made shorter pistons which are available specifically for this setup and you can have a B18c in a B16 block. The only real advantage to doing this is the sleeper effect. I've seen a 2.0L configuration like this in a B16 block and head setup so when you lift your hood, everyone thinks you only have a B16 engine in there.
Modified by 00Red_SiR at 11:32 PM 2/13/2005
#14
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: (Rice Is Best)
Here's a link to a guy doing something similar in the all motor section:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1057340
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1057340
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jose-aka-Pedro
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
02-06-2007 12:52 PM
conceptEG
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
09-04-2003 11:45 AM