cmiller219

whats the difference besides years ion theses two motors. i found they have they same hp, and trq

B16A 92-93 Integra (XSI) 170hp 113trq
B16A 92-95 (SIR II) 170hp 113trq

lsdB16aEj1

I think the xsi uses a cable operated tranny but not sure.

cmiller219

whats better cable or hydrolic?

crazyguy

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cmiller219 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">whats better cable or hydrolic?</TD></TR></TABLE>
it is just the way it is designed.i would prefer hydroic tranny..more stiff shifting feeling.and oh yeah.B16A SiR II ENGINE rocks.i have it in my eg hatch and i love it

JDMishEK

hydro is for 92+ civic's and 94+ integra's. older then that they are cable, its not worth your time to convert your car to cable if its 92+ but if its older i would recomend the hydro swap with the hasport kit. cable tranny's give a better feel, but with aftermarket clutch kits the cable tranny's can give you a workout always pushing it.

devney

SIR II is fun

JeremyMarcilla

yeap

American.Graffiti

iTrader: (7)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMishEK &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hydro is for 92+ civic's and 94+ integra's. older then that they are cable, its not worth your time to convert your car to cable if its 92+ but if its older i would recomend the hydro swap with the hasport kit. cable tranny's give a better feel, but with aftermarket clutch kits the cable tranny's can give you a workout always pushing it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree. Yesterday I finally drove a civic other than mine with a cable tranny and i like the feedback on its stock clutch better than my hydro on its stock clutch. It was alot different with the amount of pressure applied though. With my hydro it would allow me to change gears with little application while the cable was more worktruck needing full application.

lsdB16aEj1

I have the sir2 tranny with lsd, only had it for a few days now but god lsd is way nicer than no lsd, personally hydro tranny all the way. all though the cable trannys are very easy to adjust when needed.

cmiller219

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crazyguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
it is just the way it is designed.i would prefer hydroic tranny..more stiff shifting feeling.and oh yeah.B16A SiR II ENGINE rocks.i have it in my eg hatch and i love it </TD></TR></TABLE>
sweet so i should go with the SiR II and stick with the hydro tranny. sweet man tanks for all the input. its just im about to spend all this money and want to get the best product. by the way im going with a full race turbo kit tuned at 12 psi with cams full exhaust , msd, lsd, and afsc. it should be nice my goal is at least 280 to the wheels.

cmiller219

bump

B serious

iTrader: (1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cmiller219 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bump
</TD></TR></TABLE>

bump for what? wasn't your question answered?