95 cx 1/4 mile times
#4
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Tha Streets of NY, USA
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 95 cx 1/4 mile times (95cxhatch)
'92 CX
D16Z6
Stock
15.525......1/4
wit a Shitty 2.41 60'...... Pics ---> http://www.from-da-ny-streets.com/john.html
D16Z6
Stock
15.525......1/4
wit a Shitty 2.41 60'...... Pics ---> http://www.from-da-ny-streets.com/john.html
Trending Topics
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 15,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (chrysler kid)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chrysler kid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">haha why would you take it to the track </TD></TR></TABLE>
So you have something to compare your modded stuff to.
So you have something to compare your modded stuff to.
#13
Risky Business
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trackside with the smoking bee
Posts: 25,211
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
39 Posts
Re: (Ricey McRicerton)
i've seen low 18's...if you put an EX/Si tranny on the CX, it will run mid 16's. The reason they are so slow is because of their ultra long transmission. The 70HP and 92 lb-ft are more than enough to get the 2094 lb CX around town in a lively manner, just honda figured that it needed to put the longest transmission ever on the car, so we were given the slow-*** CX.
#16
Risky Business
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Trackside with the smoking bee
Posts: 25,211
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
39 Posts
Re: (yesbuy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yesbuy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">umm slower the mine ehh b-rad!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
End yourself.
End yourself.
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (BauleyCivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i've seen low 18's...if you put an EX/Si tranny on the CX, it will run mid 16's. The reason they are so slow is because of their ultra long transmission. The 70HP and 92 lb-ft are more than enough to get the 2094 lb CX around town in a lively manner, just honda figured that it needed to put the longest transmission ever on the car, so we were given the slow-*** CX.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah but the gearing and non-VtEcH PoWa! give mad top end Yo!
i would guess in the 17's or 18's
yeah but the gearing and non-VtEcH PoWa! give mad top end Yo!
i would guess in the 17's or 18's
#18
Re: (BauleyCivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i've seen low 18's...if you put an EX/Si tranny on the CX, it will run mid 16's. The reason they are so slow is because of their ultra long transmission. The 70HP and 92 lb-ft are more than enough to get the 2094 lb CX around town in a lively manner, just honda figured that it needed to put the longest transmission ever on the car, so we were given the slow-*** CX.</TD></TR></TABLE>
speaking of cx trannies, are the 5th cx and 6th gen cx trannies any different? or are the gears pretty close to the same?
speaking of cx trannies, are the 5th cx and 6th gen cx trannies any different? or are the gears pretty close to the same?
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mountain View
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 95 cx 1/4 mile times (95cxhatch)
ran my CX a few times in the track.. actually got to the 1/4 finals a few times. and once to the semi finals.. got a second place trophy!
here were my times..
RT .645
T1 2.55
T2 ?
T3 ?
MPH ?
T4 ?
E.T. 18.52
MPH 70.98
RT .581
T1 2.52
T2 ?
T3 ?
MPH ?
T4 ?
E.T. 18.59
MPH 70.74
RT 1.002
T1 2.57
T2 7.435
T3 11.568
MPH 59.04
T4 15.24
E.T. 18.47
MPH 69.2
here were my times..
RT .645
T1 2.55
T2 ?
T3 ?
MPH ?
T4 ?
E.T. 18.52
MPH 70.98
RT .581
T1 2.52
T2 ?
T3 ?
MPH ?
T4 ?
E.T. 18.59
MPH 70.74
RT 1.002
T1 2.57
T2 7.435
T3 11.568
MPH 59.04
T4 15.24
E.T. 18.47
MPH 69.2
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
civicracer1993
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
23
11-30-2002 10:11 AM