93 civic si engine question
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
93 civic si engine question
Hello
I supposed all 93 Civic Si comes with a 1.6 sohc vtec engine, right?
Reason I asked is that I came across this stock 93 si and in fact it has a 1.5l sohc engine and owner claimed everything is stock and that is the stock engine as well
So my question is did all 93 civic come with a 1.6 sohc vtec or theres some exception that is equipped with a 1.5L?
Thanks in advance
I supposed all 93 Civic Si comes with a 1.6 sohc vtec engine, right?
Reason I asked is that I came across this stock 93 si and in fact it has a 1.5l sohc engine and owner claimed everything is stock and that is the stock engine as well
So my question is did all 93 civic come with a 1.6 sohc vtec or theres some exception that is equipped with a 1.5L?
Thanks in advance
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 93 civic si engine question
let me put it this way, the engine i saw has a black valve cover and didnt say VTEC on it. So I guess the only way to verify is to look for the engine code/stamp D16Z6, right?
#6
Former Moderator
Re: 93 civic si engine question
First verify the model is in fact, an Si:
- ***VIN number will start with 2HGEH3 instead of non-Si 2HGEH2*** (most important thing to look for)
- Factory power moonroof/sunroof
- Rear disc brakes
- Rear wiper
- Vertical striped seats (92/93 only)
- Factory cruise control
- Power mirrors
If the hatch has all of this then you can be sure it's an Si.
Now for the engine:
Every single USDM 92-95 Civic Si hatch was equipped with a D16Z6 engine from the factory. It was SOHC, 1.6L, VTEC, and always had a manual/5-speed transmission attached to it.
As someone else said earlier the 92-93 had a black valvecover with just the Honda "H" centered on it, while the 94-95 had a silver valvecover with raised "VTEC" centered on it.
If this hatch is an actual Si, and it has a 1.5L in it, then the engine has been SWAPPED - period. Don't by some BS abut it being a "special" or "limited" edition.
The biggest issue with a 1.5L swap, even if it has VTEC, is that you don't know what you're getting for sure.
It could be the D16Z6-equivalent "JDM ZC VTEC" that is 1.5L, but rated with similar hp.
It could also be a much less desirable VTEC-E engine with about 27hp LESS which is more like our 92hp VX engine.
If the seller stands firm that the engine is original then he's not being 100% honest, or he bought it like that and is ignorant to these facts.
Good luck. Post pics if you can.
- ***VIN number will start with 2HGEH3 instead of non-Si 2HGEH2*** (most important thing to look for)
- Factory power moonroof/sunroof
- Rear disc brakes
- Rear wiper
- Vertical striped seats (92/93 only)
- Factory cruise control
- Power mirrors
If the hatch has all of this then you can be sure it's an Si.
Now for the engine:
Every single USDM 92-95 Civic Si hatch was equipped with a D16Z6 engine from the factory. It was SOHC, 1.6L, VTEC, and always had a manual/5-speed transmission attached to it.
As someone else said earlier the 92-93 had a black valvecover with just the Honda "H" centered on it, while the 94-95 had a silver valvecover with raised "VTEC" centered on it.
If this hatch is an actual Si, and it has a 1.5L in it, then the engine has been SWAPPED - period. Don't by some BS abut it being a "special" or "limited" edition.
The biggest issue with a 1.5L swap, even if it has VTEC, is that you don't know what you're getting for sure.
It could be the D16Z6-equivalent "JDM ZC VTEC" that is 1.5L, but rated with similar hp.
It could also be a much less desirable VTEC-E engine with about 27hp LESS which is more like our 92hp VX engine.
If the seller stands firm that the engine is original then he's not being 100% honest, or he bought it like that and is ignorant to these facts.
Good luck. Post pics if you can.
Last edited by 94EG8; 11-12-2011 at 01:55 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SIXTYdashONE
For Sale
2
12-31-2002 01:16 PM