2004 civic LS.. 124hp
11-08-2004, 10:41 AM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Slapping criminals, New York
Posts: 3,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (JDMallTHEway)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMallTHEway »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">1.7-liter, 115-hp, SOHC NON-VTEC 4-cylinder engine
with PW/PL, etc.
I think he means LX, lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
He throws me off when he says 124hp.... just read up on this site buddy... I/H/E that sounds about right for ya...
with PW/PL, etc.
I think he means LX, lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
He throws me off when he says 124hp.... just read up on this site buddy... I/H/E that sounds about right for ya...
Trending Topics
11-08-2004, 10:47 AM
#8
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Overland Park, KS, USA
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (sohcMONSTER)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sohcMONSTER »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">k20 swap or turbo or NAWWWWWWWWWWWWS</TD></TR></TABLE>
why not all 3?
why not all 3?
11-08-2004, 10:49 AM
#9
Unceasing Measure
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (gftgrill)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gftgrill »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why not all 3?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Because then you just sunk $12,000 into a Honda Civic. Good idea, though.
Because then you just sunk $12,000 into a Honda Civic. Good idea, though
.
11-08-2004, 10:49 AM
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: some place, hi, usa
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (gftgrill)
well we first gotta see what yer budget is like. then we can say whats possible.
or what youre willing to save for.
or what youre willing to save for.
11-08-2004, 10:50 AM
#11
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (Archidictus)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Because then you just sunk $12,000 into a Honda Civic. Good idea, though .</TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd do it. If I had the 12k to spare.
I wonder what kind of budget this guy has, he did get the car for free :-)
.</TD></TR></TABLE>I'd do it. If I had the 12k to spare.
I wonder what kind of budget this guy has, he did get the car for free :-)
11-08-2004, 10:50 AM
#12
Blue Sedan Crew
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (marshun)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BauleyCivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
cheapest and easiest way
</TD></TR></TABLE>cheapest and easiest way
11-08-2004, 10:52 AM
#13
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (darkcvc)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by darkcvc »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cheapest and easiest way</TD></TR></TABLE>
blargh to blow your motor.
n2o is good and all, but constant power is better...
blargh to blow your motor.
n2o is good and all, but constant power is better...
11-08-2004, 10:59 AM
#14
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (JDMallTHEway)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMallTHEway »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
blargh to blow your motor.
n2o is good and all, but constant power is better...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
N2o won't blow a motor...stupidity with N2o, or boost blows them everytime. Constant power isn't always necessary and that's probably a good thing for people that are to reckless when they have it.
blargh to blow your motor.
n2o is good and all, but constant power is better...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
N2o won't blow a motor...stupidity with N2o, or boost blows them everytime. Constant power isn't always necessary and that's probably a good thing for people that are to reckless when they have it.
11-08-2004, 11:01 AM
#15
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">N2o won't blow a motor...stupidity with N2o, or boost blows them everytime. Constant power isn't always necessary and that's probably a good thing for people that are to reckless when they have it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
hmm agreed. whats right for me isnt right for everyone.
but NOS seems like such a waste unless your a serious racer.
hmm agreed. whats right for me isnt right for everyone.
but NOS seems like such a waste unless your a serious racer.
11-08-2004, 11:11 AM
#16
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (JDMallTHEway)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMallTHEway »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hmm agreed. whats right for me isnt right for everyone.
but NOS seems like such a waste unless your a serious racer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.
hmm agreed. whats right for me isnt right for everyone.
but NOS seems like such a waste unless your a serious racer.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.
11-08-2004, 11:16 AM
#17
New User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: OG From 2001 Bitches
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
[Clapping] Well said. The same reason i plan on spraying
It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
[Clapping] Well said. The same reason i plan on spraying
11-08-2004, 11:18 AM
#18
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL, USA
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.</TD></TR></TABLE>
well put.
just curious, waht kind of quarter mile times are you running with your setups??
Thanks
well put.
just curious, waht kind of quarter mile times are you running with your setups??
Thanks
11-08-2004, 11:47 AM
#19
All Motor Mentor
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: 902, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 6,987
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (JDMallTHEway)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMallTHEway »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well put.
just curious, waht kind of quarter mile times are you running with your setups??
Thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I haven't had a chance to run it at the track this year to see, so I'll have to wait for the spring now. Before when my car was mostly stock with just a CAI, DC 4-1 and axle back exhaust with a ZEX dry kit at a 75hp shot it ran a 13.98 @102.4 mph with really heavy 17's on my car. At that time the car dyno'd at 212 hp and 177 lbs of torque to the wheels on the bottle and 142.6 hp 103 tq NA. With the mods I now have, the car dyno's at 159.6 hp and 108 tq at the wheels NA. I have since switched to a NX wet kit spraying an 80 hp shot and the car dyno's at 249.8 hp and 189 lbs of torque at the wheels. With those numbers I estimate the car should be able to run the 1/4 around 13.4 @ 105-6 mph. That's full street weight with nothing stripped out of it. Slicks would probably let me hit a high 12 or low 13 I would think.
well put.
just curious, waht kind of quarter mile times are you running with your setups??
Thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
I haven't had a chance to run it at the track this year to see, so I'll have to wait for the spring now. Before when my car was mostly stock with just a CAI, DC 4-1 and axle back exhaust with a ZEX dry kit at a 75hp shot it ran a 13.98 @102.4 mph with really heavy 17's on my car. At that time the car dyno'd at 212 hp and 177 lbs of torque to the wheels on the bottle and 142.6 hp 103 tq NA. With the mods I now have, the car dyno's at 159.6 hp and 108 tq at the wheels NA. I have since switched to a NX wet kit spraying an 80 hp shot and the car dyno's at 249.8 hp and 189 lbs of torque at the wheels. With those numbers I estimate the car should be able to run the 1/4 around 13.4 @ 105-6 mph. That's full street weight with nothing stripped out of it. Slicks would probably let me hit a high 12 or low 13 I would think.
11-08-2004, 11:54 AM
#20
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Littleton, CO, USA
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (00Red_SiR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 00Red_SiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's a good alternative that fits some people's uses such as my own quite well. Because my car is a daily driver, I like the reliability and simplicity of running NA. Rarely do I ever need that extra power on the street, but if I do, it's just a flick of the switch away. For the race track a bottle usually does me a full day of racing so it's economical. So for myself and many others like me, I have good fuel economy, reliability and power when required all for a price that's far less than running boost. You have to fill A LOT of bottles to come close to the cost of running a decent FI kit on a car. I only go through 2-3 bottles a year in my car (store it in the winter). So for some it's a good option, just like boost is better for others.</TD></TR></TABLE>
This guy just described EXACTLY how I used my nitrous and it was a blast.
This guy just described EXACTLY how I used my nitrous and it was a blast.
11-08-2004, 12:10 PM
#21
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: it was a funny angle
Posts: 3,798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 2004 civic LS.. 124hp (erique)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Archidictus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Because then you just sunk $12,000 into a Honda Civic. Good idea, though .</TD></TR></TABLE>
$12,000 on nitrous, turbo kit and k20? Maybe if you suck at life.
Because then you just sunk $12,000 into a Honda Civic. Good idea, though .</TD></TR></TABLE>
$12,000 on nitrous, turbo kit and k20? Maybe if you suck at life.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post