![]() |
Re: (1989CivicSi)
This is why i never use Clutch master Clutchs this was installed and my homie was told it could easily handle 200 whp on a 2.0L Bseries motor...
https://i117.photobucket.com/albums/...hcamera113.jpg https://i117.photobucket.com/albums/...hcamera114.jpg https://i117.photobucket.com/albums/...hcamera115.jpg I dont think so by the looks of things and HYPER16VALVE motorworks builds motors that breaks clutchs https://honda-tech.com/forums/images/smilies/emthup.gif ... |
Re: (1989CivicSi)
Moe, come see me about a clutch. I have Competition Clutches in stock.
(wow... first post on H-T in TEN days) https://honda-tech.com/forums/images...s/emsmilep.gif |
Re: (harmonator84)
Originally Posted by harmonator84
How does chase do this...i thought driving without side mirrors was illegal?
|
Re: (-NA-aLL-thE-wAy-)
Originally Posted by -NA-aLL-thE-wAy-
IIRC, rearview required, sideview not. |
Re: (fourthgenhatchB17)
Originally Posted by fourthgenhatchB17
I wanna say in Cali, a driver side mirror is req'd as is the inside rear view. I know for a fact though you can drive without a pass. side mirror. Next time i get the chance, im gonna check the vehicle code book. |
u know i dont think ive ever seen a motor shot of moe's car, wut motor is he running?
|
b16.
|
Re: (HatchMo)
Hey guys,
DC Sports B17a1 Carb header or OEM ITR 4-1 header + heatshields? Knowing that I still need to get my motor Bar'd with whatever header I decide to go with. http://is.rely.net/1-92-29998-l-1gbM...AmVuBW3hGg.gif |
Re: (1989CivicSi)
i'd go with the itr if your not gonna be slammed, or you can use the ctr header with 2.5 inch flange like what im using
|
Re: (jdmpnoy89)
Originally Posted by -NA-aLL-thE-wAy-
Yeah, it's probably a State to State thing. I know the guys with '70s-'80s model Chevy trucks love to delete both side view mirrors. |
Re: (1989CivicSi)
Originally Posted by 1989CivicSi
Hey guys,
DC Sports B17a1 Carb header or OEM ITR 4-1 header + heatshields? Knowing that I still need to get my motor Bar'd with whatever header I decide to go with. http://is.rely.net/1-92-29998-l-1gbM...AmVuBW3hGg.gif |
Re: (jdm_AE86)
Originally Posted by jdm_AE86
itr header, its a great header, and ive heard shit things about dc sports OEM quality ftw, but my only predicament was California laws regarding smog, BAR certification, etc. Oh well, I'm just going to buy a heatshield for it and hope that nobody notices https://honda-tech.com/forums/images...s/emsmilep.gif Btw, OEM Cat outlet is 2.25", correct? So pretty much I need a 2.5" flange for the inlet on the cat and a 2.25" outlet to mate up with my BC Spec II catback? |
Re: (jdm_AE86)
Originally Posted by jdm_AE86
itr header, its a great header, and ive heard shit things about dc sports the cermic finish is crap though I couple of Dyno results I have seen show that the DC 4-1 has more hp gains then the ITR header |
Re: (vega_ROCKS)
Originally Posted by vega_ROCKS
dc header is a good header the cermic finish is crap though I couple of Dyno results I have seen show that the DC 4-1 has more hp gains then the ITR header |
Re: (1989CivicSi)
ranging from 2-3 ponies
enough to make a differene...I doubt it by itself but I guess it adds up with the proper mods ITR has a 2.5 collector though, I think?? |
DC does not make more power than an itr.
|
Re: (HatchMo)
Fingerprints for the loss!
https://i70.photobucket.com/albums/i...i/DSC00946.jpg Some chrome work!! I was in LA for the EF meet and I got to pick this key part up! Thanks Guwan! Ill try and get a better pic soon |
fingerprints will be more annoying that fran drescher
|
Re: (HatchMo)
Originally Posted by HatchMo
DC does not make more power than an itr.
the great header test preformed on a ITR says different but they used a JDM DC 4-1... https://i35.tinypic.com/11al36s.jpg |
Test
|
Test.
|
how did this thread get twice as long yet lose almost 2 weeks of posting?
|
Did we loose a few pages too?
|
what the f happened to ht
|
what the hell happened to HT
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands