hondaeg8

here's what i have in a dx eg hatch:

JDM GSR Motor (B18c3)
3k miles on the motor after rebuild

Kenji chipped P28 ecu

B16 tranny
12lb lighten flywheel
exedy clutch

port N polished head
3 angle valve job
CTR cams

new crank
new oil pump
new acl bearings (main and rods)
new pistons
new piston rings
new thrust washers
motor was honed and bored .20 over

DC sports JDM 4-1 SS header with 2.5" collector (won't matter)
CAI
AEM fpr

2.5" exhaust piping
apexi muffler

i was thinking of a 18g greddy kit, but can't find one for sale. i want something that kinda has a fast spool and thats why i wanted the greddy kit. i'm not looking to making a lot of power, just more power than the JRSC i have on the car. i'm currently running 6psi with JRSC, but i know i'll make more power running 6-7psi with a turbo kit.

tallyturbo

if you want a kit just get a peakboost kit. other words peice it together yourself and use a garret t4/to4e 50 or 57 trim

GS-R Civic

Piece together your own. The 57 trim works well with the B18c, check my signature!

hondaeg8

damn, i'm running that with a supercharger on my gsr motor on 6psi.

GS-R Civic

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondaeg8 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">damn, i'm running that with a supercharger on my gsr motor on 6psi.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Running what??

atec

Full-race stg1 kit should give you orgasm .

hondaeg8

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GS-R Civic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Running what??</TD></TR></TABLE>

low 13's high 12's.


would a Drag Gen 3 kit be good for my car?

boostedeghatch

t3 turbo 48 trim good for a gsr motor?

Schurke

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostedeghatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">t3 turbo 48 trim good for a gsr motor? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Sounds good... Will spool up at around 2k, and you'll start to feel it let go at around 5-6k... you'll run about 220whp @ ~9psi with that.

JmurGSR98

I read in a book where a b-16 with a t3 was tested against the same motor with a t3/t04 and the t3 produced more hp and torque than the t3/t04. the motor did not respond as well as thought from the t04's larger compressor.

...esteban

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JmurGSR98 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I read in a book where a b-16 with a t3 was tested against the same motor with a t3/t04 and the t3 produced more hp and torque than the t3/t04. the motor did not respond as well as thought from the t04's larger compressor. </TD></TR></TABLE>

thats a good story, but I dont buy it...UNLESS you meant t3 like a 60-1... sure, but in this case the term "t3" doesn't adequately describe the turbo, and judging by your post, the t3 seemed to be the "smaller" turbo

hondaeg8

i want something thats going to spool up pretty quick, but not lose steam up top.

i'm running a b16 tranny, so i'm thinking that traction may be a problem as i have an eg hatch that this set up will be in.

i was thinking of a Greddy 18g, but i can't find anyone selling a used one.

here's a pic of the turbo i was looking at getting:

http://www.t-mobilepictures.co...zhw4n

don't know the exact specs on it just yet.

GS-R Civic

Get a t3/t4 with a 57 trim compressor, for a little faster spool get the .48 A/R turbine or for a little more top end get the .60 A/R. That is what I have on my GSR. Full boost (7psi) around 4k and hold up top. With a little more psi it will really start to move!!

hondaeg8

thanks for the info

hondaeg8

would this be good enough:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...ZWDVW

GS-R Civic

I would have a new down pipe made up, that will really restrice you power. Also you will need to invest in a solid EMS. Get a conversion harness and a chipped obdi ecu with a basemap then drive to a tuner asap!!

hondaeg8

already have a chipped ecu

StreetEG

gt28rs71? (my fav turbo)

dpetro1

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JmurGSR98 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I read in a book where a b-16 with a t3 was tested against the same motor with a t3/t04 and the t3 produced more hp and torque than the t3/t04. the motor did not respond as well as thought from the t04's larger compressor. </TD></TR></TABLE>

i actually have that book. i was like wtf when i read that too. a t3 60 trim .63 ar made more power than a t3/t04b .63ar (unknown trim). i still dunno if i buy it cause the book said they never found the "problem" but who knows.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ...Lost &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thats a good story, but I dont buy it...UNLESS you meant t3 like a 60-1... sure, but in this case the term "t3" doesn't adequately describe the turbo, and judging by your post, the t3 seemed to be the "smaller" turbo</TD></TR></TABLE>

i have the dynos from the book that show the t3 being better but i dunno if i believe it. obviously a larger compressor should flow more and make more power. but as another example...the full-race team originally had a 60-1 on their pinks car and were making bad power with it. swapped to a t3/t4 57 trim and the car made way better power. i dunno i guess even the best theories dont always work out.

HiProfile

If it was a little s-trim t3/t04B (1.9" inducer, 2.75" exducer), and a super60 t3 (1.9" inducer, 2.367" exducer), I wouldn't doubt it. Looking at the maps for both (from same source), the s-trim flows 37lb/hr, and the super60 36lb/hr. The s-trim has more restriction due to the extra vane and a heavier wheel. I'd also surmise the super60 had a stage3 wheel, and the t3/t04b had a stage1 turbine. It all goes to show you, its the little specs that count. Anyways...

Anything between a super60 t3 and a t3/t04E 50trim will make you happy.


btw (comp. maps): http://majesticturbo.com/c-maps-2.html

dpetro1

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HiProfile &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> its the little specs that count.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

good point, there were no specs on the t3/t04b but i know the t3 was from the 2.3l turbo mustang, im pretty sure they are the super 60 right?

anyways, i digress, ill vote for the 50 or 57 trim as well.

...esteban

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dpetro1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...the full-race team originally had a 60-1 on their pinks car and were making bad power with it. swapped to a t3/t4 57 trim and the car made way better power. i dunno i guess even the best theories dont always work out. </TD></TR></TABLE>

that 60-1 was junk off the shelf...not a good comparison...