what kind of intake manifold is this?
07-11-2007, 05:15 AM
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (89hatcher)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 89hatcher »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah look inside the runners...its smooth as hell</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.
07-11-2007, 05:33 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (tepid1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tepid1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve.
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve.
Trending Topics
07-11-2007, 05:45 AM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Youngstown, OH, USA
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (tony1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve. </TD></TR></TABLE>
lol, love it!
anyways, the manifold looks like one off of a b16 / type-r It's just polished.
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve.
</TD></TR></TABLE>lol, love it!
anyways, the manifold looks like one off of a b16 / type-r It's just polished.
07-11-2007, 07:15 AM
#9
Re: (tony1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve. </TD></TR></TABLE>
But wouldn't it cause less turbulance in the air pre injector which would then = poor(er) atomization.
Since the fuel is injected at the end of the runner, at the back of the valve.
</TD></TR></TABLE>But wouldn't it cause less turbulance in the air pre injector which would then = poor(er) atomization.
07-11-2007, 12:51 PM
#13
Re: (mitsuman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mitsuman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
But wouldn't it cause less turbulance in the air pre injector which would then = poor(er) atomization.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
no, the gas evaporates when it hits the cylinder head because of the heat...
But wouldn't it cause less turbulance in the air pre injector which would then = poor(er) atomization.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
no, the gas evaporates when it hits the cylinder head because of the heat...
07-12-2007, 02:31 PM
#19
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: what kind of intake manifold is this? (dohcdelsol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dohcdelsol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">not a skunk2 thats for sure.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Maybe not the new Skunk2 Pro Series BUT it can be the old school Skunk2 which was just a copy of the ITR manifold anyways
Maybe not the new Skunk2 Pro Series BUT it can be the old school Skunk2 which was just a copy of the ITR manifold anyways
07-12-2007, 02:32 PM
#20
New User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 12,296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (tepid1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tepid1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Cylinder head not intake manifold maybe?
Ideally you don't want smooth runners in the intake manifold. It hurts fuel atomization which will actually decrease power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Cylinder head not intake manifold maybe?
07-12-2007, 05:22 PM
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Boostfed.com)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Boostfed.com »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Cylinder head not intake manifold maybe? </TD></TR></TABLE>
It's actually the entire intake runner AND the cylinder head. I've heard from a couple head builders that the roughness of the surface will create a "buffer" zone of air that the intake charge will flow on. It's basiclly like an invisible lubricant for the intake charge. I guess velocity, and overall flow is a little higher with the rough surface VS a polished one. However, I'm not too sure how much of an effect it would have on a boosted motor.
Cylinder head not intake manifold maybe? </TD></TR></TABLE>
It's actually the entire intake runner AND the cylinder head. I've heard from a couple head builders that the roughness of the surface will create a "buffer" zone of air that the intake charge will flow on. It's basiclly like an invisible lubricant for the intake charge. I guess velocity, and overall flow is a little higher with the rough surface VS a polished one. However, I'm not too sure how much of an effect it would have on a boosted motor.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dat1BVtecN
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
91
04-27-2007 10:26 AM
