RATEDR

Who here has one? What does it do that the AEM one doesnt? Is it that much better?

Opinions please.

93LSivic

http://www.aeromotiveinc.com/

b18bturbo

its both are 1:1 fpr no difference. They both do the same

PrecisionH23a

the aeromotive one looks better imo, it also has a source to hook a guage up to if im not mistaken... i konw the paxton fpr does.


[Modified by GudeH23a, 1:38 PM 7/31/2002]

93LSivic

I guess the #1 main reason for going with the AEM over the aeromotive, sx, vortech, would be ease of installation. The AEM bolts on to the fuel rail giving a simplistic install. All the others need fittings, ss lines, and in most cases a new fuel rail.
I run an SX and its works great for me. Im not really a big AEM fan. With the exception of the EMS, I dont think I would ever buy any of their other produces.

ArizonaTurbo

The Aeromotive FPR can be adjusted up to 70psi and teh SX is adjustable to 90psi. I am not too sure what the AEM is rated at, all their website says is "Adjustable from 20 psi to maximum fuel pump capacity rating".