Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity?
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N00b, FL
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity?
Do turbo intake manifold's rely on the velocity of the air or the amount of the air coming in?
Would boring out the throttlebody and intake manifold create a larger area for the air to travel through, therefore creating "lag".
Would smaller runners = faster throttleresponse/faster sppol time?
Its kind of a hard question to type out.
Thanks
Would boring out the throttlebody and intake manifold create a larger area for the air to travel through, therefore creating "lag".
Would smaller runners = faster throttleresponse/faster sppol time?
Its kind of a hard question to type out.
Thanks
#3
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity? (Sgt. Slaughter)
from what i know. you are right both times.its kind of liek altering chrage pipe diameter. smaller pipes = faster spool. larger pipes = more flow but more time to pressurize system. although porting the intake manifold wouldnt really make any noticeable difference in spool time. installing a larger throttle body and piping will
HTH
HTH
#4
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: N00b, FL
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity? (wantboost)
Would the lag negate the gains? Throttlebody wise?
Thanks, sorry if I sound like a n00b, but Im just trying to understand
Thanks, sorry if I sound like a n00b, but Im just trying to understand
#5
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity? (Sgt. Slaughter)
i dont think you'll see that much of a difference unless you are making upwards of 550-600hp. for most people out there 2.5" piping and stock throttle body is enough. you hve to remember once you pressurize the intake tract, it doesnt matter how big or small the opening is, the air has no choice but to go in. so the gains that would otherwise be noticed on an n/a setup are lost here beacuse you are forcing air into the motor, not sucking it in.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Turbo: Velocity versus Quantity? (wantboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i dont think you'll see that much of a difference unless you are making upwards of 550-600hp. for most people out there 2.5" piping and stock throttle body is enough. you hve to remember once you pressurize the intake tract, it doesnt matter how big or small the opening is, the air has no choice but to go in. so the gains that would otherwise be noticed on an n/a setup are lost here beacuse you are forcing air into the motor, not sucking it in.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Turbo or NA, you are forcing the air in every bit as much as the engine sucks it in. Examine air pressure vs. "vacuum" created by intake stroke. Regardless which path you choose, pumping losses apply; a turbo will not overcome those. Enough pumping losses and you'll find knock limit drastically lowered.
Turbo or NA, you are forcing the air in every bit as much as the engine sucks it in. Examine air pressure vs. "vacuum" created by intake stroke. Regardless which path you choose, pumping losses apply; a turbo will not overcome those. Enough pumping losses and you'll find knock limit drastically lowered.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
slayer423
Forced Induction
20
12-18-2012 02:13 PM
logg_frogg
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
20
09-17-2008 12:01 PM