turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: maryland, usa
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec
alright heres my set up. i have a b18b1 sleeved with darton closed deck sleeves bored to 84mm running a stock crank new toga bearings, arias pistons 9.0:1 compression along with eagle rods. the head is based on all crower parts. valves, valve springs, retainers, valve guides and turbo regrind cams. fuel i have a walbro 255 fuel pump and aem fuel rail fuel pressure regulator and 880 cc injectors. running on a hondata system. my manifold is a neukin ram style manifold. right now i am running a t3 exaust is ar .48 and intake is 60 trim. i want to run more most that what this will let me. i am trying to run say 15 daily which is my max right now. and then 25 when i race. i want to get a garrett super 70 but i am thinking that may be alittle to big give me some info please on what i should run
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: quebec, canada
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (zbower7)
How many whp you want to do?
What kind of powerband do you want?
You can run 25 psi with your t3 if it all you want....
What kind of powerband do you want?
You can run 25 psi with your t3 if it all you want....
#5
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: maryland, usa
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (Sprayteg)
the t70 i am looking at has a ar .84 and a compressor housing ar of .70
no i have also found another t04 that has a ar .50 and a compressor housing of ar .70. which one of theses would be able to make 500 + whp at like 25 lbs of boost. give me some help please power band from around 4 to 5 up to 8500
no i have also found another t04 that has a ar .50 and a compressor housing of ar .70. which one of theses would be able to make 500 + whp at like 25 lbs of boost. give me some help please power band from around 4 to 5 up to 8500
Trending Topics
#8
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (zbower7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zbower7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">y you say not from ssac whats wrong with there turbos
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Because if you took 15 seconds and searched you would realize they make shitty products
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Because if you took 15 seconds and searched you would realize they make shitty products
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: ashEVILle, NC, USSR
Posts: 4,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (boosted92)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Because if you took 15 seconds and searched you would realize they make shitty products </TD></TR></TABLE>
They clean up nicely though. Hint: buy used for pennies, then fix.
2.0 LS, Darton closed deck sleeves, Eagles, Crower stuffs up top... the only other LS like that I know of runs a Holset HX35 to good effect. Good luck fitting it to your existing turbo manifold though.
They clean up nicely though. Hint: buy used for pennies, then fix.
2.0 LS, Darton closed deck sleeves, Eagles, Crower stuffs up top... the only other LS like that I know of runs a Holset HX35 to good effect. Good luck fitting it to your existing turbo manifold though.
#12
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: maryland, usa
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (pubestripe)
the ssac t04 with a ar .50 and a 70 trim is a garrett turbo that has a year warranty. is there really something that bad with them
#13
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Re: turbo size for a 2.0l non vtec (zbower7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by zbower7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the ssac t04 with a ar .50 and a 70 trim is a garrett turbo that has a year warranty. is there really something that bad with them</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes. they are truely awfully designed turbos. They are supposedly Garrett "SPEC", not a Garrett product. I've been designing setups and turbos for years, and I wouldn't wish that thing on my worst enemy
PM me, I'll spect the CORRECT one for you..
Yes. they are truely awfully designed turbos. They are supposedly Garrett "SPEC", not a Garrett product. I've been designing setups and turbos for years, and I wouldn't wish that thing on my worst enemy
PM me, I'll spect the CORRECT one for you..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
qtcivicturbo
Forced Induction
6
08-09-2007 09:53 AM