Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
I seen this site http://ststurbo.com/ along time ago and was wondering if anyone here has done this with Honda stuff? I was thinking of using a NA header and from the cat back fab my own T4 flange to mount the turbo somewhere (Not sure where yet) in the rear of the car. This will be my weekend ride not an everyday car. The purpose would be longevity of the turbo and a cleaner engine bay.
It's a S362 ETT turbo it'll be ran off an LS/Vtec B18A1-B16A2 power plant. I'm not worried about loss of spool up time (If there would be any??) again more concerned with heat and cleanliness.
Thoughts or concerns?
It's a S362 ETT turbo it'll be ran off an LS/Vtec B18A1-B16A2 power plant. I'm not worried about loss of spool up time (If there would be any??) again more concerned with heat and cleanliness.
Thoughts or concerns?
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
STS turbo setups have been around for years. Not the most popular because of the fact that most Honda enthusiasts lower their car to a point where it risks physical damage to the turbo, and they don't want to run an oil sump system on the car. With a lot of aftermarket available to Honda enthusiasts you won't find too many users of this particular setup.
That's a BIG turbo to put on some daily car. you SHOULD be concerned about "spool up" and such based upon the use of the car you plan and the power you plan to make. The stock engine can take about 350whp MAXIMUM, and using a S362 is just beyond overkill, and you'll be horribly unresponsive until about 5000rpms or so, in which then the car becomes uncontrollable.
That's a BIG turbo to put on some daily car. you SHOULD be concerned about "spool up" and such based upon the use of the car you plan and the power you plan to make. The stock engine can take about 350whp MAXIMUM, and using a S362 is just beyond overkill, and you'll be horribly unresponsive until about 5000rpms or so, in which then the car becomes uncontrollable.
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
http://www.d-series.org/forums/force...n-come.htmlkid went througfh with it and said he liked the outcome
closest thing i would do is a n/a header with and up pipe under the intake mani
closest thing i would do is a n/a header with and up pipe under the intake mani
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
STS turbo setups have been around for years. Not the most popular because of the fact that most Honda enthusiasts lower their car to a point where it risks physical damage to the turbo, and they don't want to run an oil sump system on the car. With a lot of aftermarket available to Honda enthusiasts you won't find too many users of this particular setup.
That's a BIG turbo to put on some daily car. you SHOULD be concerned about "spool up" and such based upon the use of the car you plan and the power you plan to make. The stock engine can take about 350whp MAXIMUM, and using a S362 is just beyond overkill, and you'll be horribly unresponsive until about 5000rpms or so, in which then the car becomes uncontrollable.
That's a BIG turbo to put on some daily car. you SHOULD be concerned about "spool up" and such based upon the use of the car you plan and the power you plan to make. The stock engine can take about 350whp MAXIMUM, and using a S362 is just beyond overkill, and you'll be horribly unresponsive until about 5000rpms or so, in which then the car becomes uncontrollable.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
I should have stated more, sorry!
Sleeved block from Darton
Fully built and ported head
CP 9.1 85mm with manely rods
1000cc ID's
255 Walbro
Sleeved block from Darton
Fully built and ported head
CP 9.1 85mm with manely rods
1000cc ID's
255 Walbro
Last edited by 0c00l; 01-17-2012 at 11:53 AM.
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
http://www.d-series.org/forums/force...n-come.htmlkid went througfh with it and said he liked the outcome
closest thing i would do is a n/a header with and up pipe under the intake mani
closest thing i would do is a n/a header with and up pipe under the intake mani
Trending Topics
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
Thx for your response, I think that's probably the only thing I'm not going to care for either however being able to run a full size radiator up front and having a better tucked engine bay and a longer lasting turbo will be worth the extra effort.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
#12
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
That's a BIG turbo to put on some daily car. you SHOULD be concerned about "spool up" and such based upon the use of the car you plan and the power you plan to make. The stock engine can take about 350whp MAXIMUM, and using a S362 is just beyond overkill, and you'll be horribly unresponsive until about 5000rpms or so, in which then the car becomes uncontrollable.
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
So what exactly am I missing?
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
I sure didn't miss it. He stated that it was a big turbo for a daily car with stock internals. I stated that its not a daily car with stock internals but forged. How is spool up going to be effected by having the turbo in the rear of the vehicle, he never stated why and neither did you?
So what exactly am I missing?
So what exactly am I missing?
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
it will take a bit longer to spool, on a rear mount turbo you dont really need a intercooler though so you dont need to deal with the pressure loss there....but before the motor can see positive pressure you will need to pressurize the 10 feet of charge pipe from the rear to the front...you also will lose some velocity in the exhaust(so its moving slower, thus spinning the turbo at a slower rate).i honestly dont think it would be more than a 2-500rpm reduction in spool time.....
you also will lose some velocity in the exaust....so you may have to play around with exhaust sizes, it has to be enough to get the exhaust out but not so big to reduce velocity.....you also want to keep the heat in, so wrapping or even double wrapping the exhaust will help
you also will lose some velocity in the exaust....so you may have to play around with exhaust sizes, it has to be enough to get the exhaust out but not so big to reduce velocity.....you also want to keep the heat in, so wrapping or even double wrapping the exhaust will help
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: Turbo mounted in the rear of the car!?
it will take a bit longer to spool, on a rear mount turbo you dont really need a intercooler though so you dont need to deal with the pressure loss there....but before the motor can see positive pressure you will need to pressurize the 10 feet of charge pipe from the rear to the front...you also will lose some velocity in the exhaust(so its moving slower, thus spinning the turbo at a slower rate).i honestly dont think it would be more than a 2-500rpm reduction in spool time.....
you also will lose some velocity in the exaust....so you may have to play around with exhaust sizes, it has to be enough to get the exhaust out but not so big to reduce velocity.....you also want to keep the heat in, so wrapping or even double wrapping the exhaust will help
you also will lose some velocity in the exaust....so you may have to play around with exhaust sizes, it has to be enough to get the exhaust out but not so big to reduce velocity.....you also want to keep the heat in, so wrapping or even double wrapping the exhaust will help
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post