T3/T67 worth it on a stock block LS/VTEC?
09-15-2004, 04:10 PM
#2
Honda-Tech Member
That turbo is way to big for your setup. I would just go with a small turbo from a greddy kit or a drag kit. That turbo will be ridiculously laggy. My fully built lsvtec will be using that turbo but stock block with the low revs you will see boost around 5500 i think
09-15-2004, 05:12 PM
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (quik sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by quik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">stock bore...stock pistons, rods and sleeves too?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Naa...His motors built.
Naa...His motors built.
09-15-2004, 05:45 PM
#6
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (quik sol)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by quik sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That turbo is way to big for your setup. I would just go with a small turbo from a greddy kit or a drag kit. That turbo will be ridiculously laggy. My fully built lsvtec will be using that turbo but stock block with the low revs you will see boost around 5500 i think</TD></TR></TABLE>
From what I've been told this turbo should see 7 or 8 pounds of boost by 5000 RPM's. I'm not too worried about lag, especially since ITR206 said it spools about the same as a T3/TO4E 60 trim, but more about making too much power for the stock LS rods to handle.
From what I've been told this turbo should see 7 or 8 pounds of boost by 5000 RPM's. I'm not too worried about lag, especially since ITR206 said it spools about the same as a T3/TO4E 60 trim, but more about making too much power for the stock LS rods to handle.
Trending Topics
09-16-2004, 11:15 AM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FULL RACE, AZ, USA
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (@lbert)
a lot of us here at full race have run this turbo on stock sleeve built ls/vtecs with great luck. henry made 420 whp at 13 psi, and the car is very, very fast it is a really fun setup, and definately is not too much turbo for that motor
it is a really fun setup, and definately is not too much turbo for that motor
09-16-2004, 11:23 AM
#9
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: TurBlowVille, SC, USA
Posts: 3,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Full-Race Geoff)
I should have everything on and running by this weekend and I'll give some insight on how I like it. My last turbo was a sc61 so I will compare the too if I have enough time to drive, since the damn Hurricane is coming and it will prop bw raining
09-16-2004, 11:50 AM
#10
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Full-Race Geoff)
Thanks for the assurance guys, I have a few friends coming over now and we're gonna start putting the motor in tonight! Would you say it's easier to get the motor in the car with the turbo and manifold already on, or take it off?
09-17-2004, 11:12 AM
#14
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Burke)
Wow, this setup is ******* SICK! Got it ALL in last night, had my brother help me get it running. Left timing at stock LS settings, added in some more fuel with uberdata, car is only going to see straight 117 octane VP leaded untill I get the car tuned. I'm running a 6-psi spring in the gate with no boost controller, as well as open downpipe It's about an 8 mile round trip to school, so my dad said it's OK to just use his race gas till I have enough money for a tune (just got a job today!) because he'd rather have me waste a bit of C16 then blow my motor and put me back even further in the hole 
But this car is freakin LOUD even taking it as easy as I could, but for now I love it
It's about an 8 mile round trip to school, so my dad said it's OK to just use his race gas till I have enough money for a tune (just got a job today!) because he'd rather have me waste a bit of C16 then blow my motor and put me back even further in the hole But this car is freakin LOUD even taking it as easy as I could, but for now I love it
09-17-2004, 11:51 PM
#16
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (Burke)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Burke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you probaly shouldnt have a car that fast until you get out of high school...............</TD></TR></TABLE>
While I do agree with you, not every kid is the same.
Just take the proper precautions is all I would ask. (IE, don't kill yourself or anyone else )
While I do agree with you, not every kid is the same.
Just take the proper precautions is all I would ask. (IE, don't kill yourself or anyone else
)
09-18-2004, 04:58 AM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: www.js-garage.com
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (FOrSfEd)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by FOrSfEd »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I should have everything on and running by this weekend and I'll give some insight on how I like it. My last turbo was a sc61 so I will compare the too if I have enough time to drive, since the damn Hurricane is coming and it will prop bw raining</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you plan on boosting that stock b18c5 motor. you better keep the boost crazy low!!!!!!
if you plan on boosting that stock b18c5 motor. you better keep the boost crazy low!!!!!!
09-18-2004, 07:47 AM
#18
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: NYC bitchessss
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Jordo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jordo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if you plan on boosting that stock b18c5 motor. you better keep the boost crazy low!!!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Haahah, coming from someone who was pushing 350+ on a stock ITR block lol
Haahah, coming from someone who was pushing 350+ on a stock ITR block lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post