T3/67 vs t3/67 H.O.
05-08-2005, 06:20 AM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee, U.S.
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T3/67 vs t3/67 H.O.
I currently have the SC61 turbo on a 2.0 mazda engine, I get full 27psi about 5000rpm.
I am trying to decide between the t3/67 and the t3/67 H.O. Now I was told that the t3/67 would increase my lag by 500rpm not bad right. Well I was also told that the t3/67 H.O. would spool quicker than the t3/67 If this is so I will go ahead and get the H.O. version. All in all this would mean that the t3/67 H.O. would spool close to what the SC61 does already just with alot more power. Any help would be appreciated.
I am trying to decide between the t3/67 and the t3/67 H.O. Now I was told that the t3/67 would increase my lag by 500rpm not bad right. Well I was also told that the t3/67 H.O. would spool quicker than the t3/67 If this is so I will go ahead and get the H.O. version. All in all this would mean that the t3/67 H.O. would spool close to what the SC61 does already just with alot more power. Any help would be appreciated.
05-08-2005, 06:25 AM
#2
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: T3/67 vs t3/67 H.O. (boostedfe3)
You must be shooting for FallGuys best time with his FE3, huh Andy?
I would go with the HO. That FE3 has a lot of potential and you guys haven't even started with any real headwork.
I would go with the HO. That FE3 has a lot of potential and you guys haven't even started with any real headwork.
05-08-2005, 07:08 AM
#3
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: T3/67 vs t3/67 H.O. (boostedfe3)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boostedfe3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I currently have the SC61 turbo on a 2.0 mazda engine, I get full 27psi about 5000rpm.
I am trying to decide between the t3/67 and the t3/67 H.O. Now I was told that the t3/67 would increase my lag by 500rpm not bad right. Well I was also told that the t3/67 H.O. would spool quicker than the t3/67 If this is so I will go ahead and get the H.O. version. All in all this would mean that the t3/67 H.O. would spool close to what the SC61 does already just with alot more power. Any help would be appreciated.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The spool difference between an SC61 and a .63 A/R T3/T67 is negligable, there really isn't much there. The T3/T67 HO car I drove was a lagmaster. While my T3/T67 (Stage 5 Wheel, .63 A/R Exhaust) is coming on right around 5000, the HO was coming on at about 6000. Felt just like driving a PT67 car.
How much power do you want to make is a good question. An SC61 is 625, probably 650 WHP capable. I have no doubts a T3/T67 Stage 5 could make 700 WHP.
I am trying to decide between the t3/67 and the t3/67 H.O. Now I was told that the t3/67 would increase my lag by 500rpm not bad right. Well I was also told that the t3/67 H.O. would spool quicker than the t3/67 If this is so I will go ahead and get the H.O. version. All in all this would mean that the t3/67 H.O. would spool close to what the SC61 does already just with alot more power. Any help would be appreciated.</TD></TR></TABLE>
The spool difference between an SC61 and a .63 A/R T3/T67 is negligable, there really isn't much there. The T3/T67 HO car I drove was a lagmaster. While my T3/T67 (Stage 5 Wheel, .63 A/R Exhaust) is coming on right around 5000, the HO was coming on at about 6000. Felt just like driving a PT67 car.
How much power do you want to make is a good question. An SC61 is 625, probably 650 WHP capable. I have no doubts a T3/T67 Stage 5 could make 700 WHP.
05-08-2005, 08:30 AM
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee, U.S.
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: T3/67 vs t3/67 H.O.
No Im not trying to beat Matts times, as I dont have the probe anymore the FE3 is in a 90 miata now. About the t3/67 and t3/67 H.O. I got the info from Todd at Full-Race about the spool-up characteristics. If the H.O. would spool up somewhat close to the stg.5 wheel then I would get the H.O. I am only trying to make 550whp or better it was just hard to do with the SC61 because I had a stock head and I doesnt flow all that well. Now I have a ported head and it should wake up the motor alot.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
