t3/60-1 vs. sc61
03-15-2005, 03:53 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LaPlata, MD, USA
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
t3/60-1 vs. sc61
Im am going to be ditching my greddy kit buying a new turbo in manifold in about a month i was wondering how these 2 turboes compare to each other! Im looking to have the possiblilty of making 450-500 horsepower on my h22a prelude! I planning on keeping i around 320-350 on the street! Which of the two is better for the street because my car is a full show car that gets driven on the street the majority of the time and at the track once or twice a month!
Set up
Aebs sleeves
89mm Arias 9:01
crower rods with upgraded arp bolts
micropolished crank
arp head studs
crower valve springs mild valve job
stock cams, stock valves
give me your opinions and if you feel there is a better turbo for my goals!!
Set up
Aebs sleeves
89mm Arias 9:01
crower rods with upgraded arp bolts
micropolished crank
arp head studs
crower valve springs mild valve job
stock cams, stock valves
give me your opinions and if you feel there is a better turbo for my goals!!
03-15-2005, 03:56 PM
#2
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (jsprelude)
60-1 supports about 525 crank hp, sc61 supports like 680 or something. the sc61 has a more efficient compressor wheel and is just about as laggy as the 60-1
03-15-2005, 04:16 PM
#3
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: manakin sabot, va, us
Posts: 4,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (wantboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">60-1 supports about 525 crank hp, sc61 supports like 680 or something. the sc61 has a more efficient compressor wheel and is just about as laggy as the 60-1</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol so you says it max out at 420whp
come on u know more about turbos then that
a 60-1 flows 58lbs/min so that nets u at around 500whp but i have seen 600whp with a t4/60-1
the sc61 start out the smallest with a 630hp up to a 680hp not whp
the best thing about the sc61 it will make more power at lower boost then the 60-1
lol so you says it max out at 420whp
come on u know more about turbos then that
a 60-1 flows 58lbs/min so that nets u at around 500whp but i have seen 600whp with a t4/60-1
the sc61 start out the smallest with a 630hp up to a 680hp not whp
the best thing about the sc61 it will make more power at lower boost then the 60-1
03-15-2005, 04:24 PM
#4
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (wantboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">60-1 supports about 525 crank hp, sc61 supports like 680 or something. the sc61 has a more efficient compressor wheel and is just about as laggy as the 60-1</TD></TR></TABLE>
WRONG. Try again.
Measured at the wheels
This is the t3 60-1 hifi turbo ( 2 3/4” inlet, 2” discharge) ; which is less efficient than the standard 60-1 (4” inlet, 2.5” discharge) compressor housing.
WRONG. Try again.
Measured at the wheelsThis is the t3 60-1 hifi turbo ( 2 3/4” inlet, 2” discharge) ; which is less efficient than the standard 60-1 (4” inlet, 2.5” discharge) compressor housing.
03-15-2005, 04:31 PM
#5
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (rondigs)
actually, yes, the sc61 is more efficient than the 60-1. I would personally go wit hthe sc61 as it would be better for your goals
isnt the 60-1 hifi just the 60-1 wheel in a E housing?
isnt the 60-1 hifi just the 60-1 wheel in a E housing?
03-15-2005, 04:51 PM
#7
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (wantboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">60-1 supports about 525 crank hp</TD></TR></TABLE>
Entirely not true.
Entirely not true.
Trending Topics
03-15-2005, 05:01 PM
#8
Who is Mr Robot?
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ATL - Where the Pimps and Players dwell
Posts: 21,474
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (rondigs)
yes, ok, we already found out i was wrong, lol
The hifi is just the e-housing right, i wouldnt think theyd put a wheel that big in a b housing
The hifi is just the e-housing right, i wouldnt think theyd put a wheel that big in a b housing
03-15-2005, 05:57 PM
#9
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: LaPlata, MD, USA
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (wantboost)
thanks for the input guys! have any suggestions on a good log style manifold that i can keep ac with i was thinking either spoolin performance or the one made by innovative turbo!
03-15-2005, 06:19 PM
#10
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: work
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: t3/60-1 vs. sc61 (wantboost)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, ok, we already found out i was wrong, lol
The hifi is just the e-housing right, i wouldnt think theyd put a wheel that big in a b housing</TD></TR></TABLE>
2.75" inlet 2" outlet = TO4B
3" Inlet 2" outlet = TO4E
It's the TO4B.
The hifi is just the e-housing right, i wouldnt think theyd put a wheel that big in a b housing</TD></TR></TABLE>
2.75" inlet 2" outlet = TO4B
3" Inlet 2" outlet = TO4E
It's the TO4B.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
