The sickest b16 torque monster I have seen!
02-18-2006, 10:05 PM
#1
The sickest b16 torque monster I have seen!
This is the sickest b16 EVER! lol 
Right click and hit save as to download the video!!!
This car was street tuned for fuel economy :D
We could have pulled more out of her
If you have not noticed this post is a joke....
Stay tuned as the monster will have a sc61 turbo on it within the month. :D
Modified by mtber at 2:53 AM 2/19/2006
Modified by mtber at 1:15 PM 2/19/2006
Right click and hit save as to download the video!!!
This car was street tuned for fuel economy :D
We could have pulled more out of her
If you have not noticed this post is a joke....
Stay tuned as the monster will have a sc61 turbo on it within the month. :D
Modified by mtber at 2:53 AM 2/19/2006
Modified by mtber at 1:15 PM 2/19/2006
02-18-2006, 10:54 PM
#6
Re: The sickest b16 torque monster I have seen! (rlyoung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rlyoung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">HAHAHAHA dude seriously that was great !!?</TD></TR></TABLE>
She almost maxed out the dyno
She almost maxed out the dyno
Trending Topics
02-19-2006, 05:18 AM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: A Place in, Florida, USA
Posts: 7,277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The sickest b16 torque monster I have seen! (mtber)
This is the only B16a I have ever seen make torque And the volume on my speakers were too high when I played that video
That was at 13.7lbs with sinking sleeves and a blown head gasket
And the volume on my speakers were too high when I played that video That was at 13.7lbs with sinking sleeves and a blown head gasket
02-19-2006, 08:24 AM
#15
* B A N N E D *
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
haha...108tq really isn't THAT bad for a stock car.....i've seen 98-100 on a regular occasion with them
oh...wait..more ppl flammed than said anything else...umm...you suck!!! you S!!U!UIIK!!CKKK!! whew....NOW i fit in
oh...wait..more ppl flammed than said anything else...umm...you suck!!! you S!!U!UIIK!!CKKK!! whew....NOW i fit in
02-19-2006, 09:42 AM
#17
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MeLo, Mama
Posts: 1,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mtber)
****, for a stock b16, that thing pulled some pretty good numbers IMO.
my old b16 had OS ctr pistons, skunk2 mani, itr TB, intake, itr 4-1 header & 2.5" exhaust..
and i made a whopping 149whp/109tq
keep us updated as the sc61 finds its way into the engine bay.
my old b16 had OS ctr pistons, skunk2 mani, itr TB, intake, itr 4-1 header & 2.5" exhaust..
and i made a whopping 149whp/109tq
keep us updated as the sc61 finds its way into the engine bay.
02-19-2006, 08:18 PM
#18
Re: (large farva)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by large farva »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">****, for a stock b16, that thing pulled some pretty good numbers IMO.
my old b16 had OS ctr pistons, skunk2 mani, itr TB, intake, itr 4-1 header & 2.5" exhaust..
and i made a whopping 149whp/109tq
keep us updated as the sc61 finds its way into the engine bay.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree it is a bit more power then most stock b16s
Anyhow this thread just was for shitz
my old b16 had OS ctr pistons, skunk2 mani, itr TB, intake, itr 4-1 header & 2.5" exhaust..
and i made a whopping 149whp/109tq
keep us updated as the sc61 finds its way into the engine bay.
</TD></TR></TABLE>I agree it is a bit more power then most stock b16s
Anyhow this thread just was for shitz
02-19-2006, 08:32 PM
#19
Re: (mtber)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mtber »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bahaha.... YOU SUCK.... oh wait... I posted the "joke" </TD></TR></TABLE>
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ReVHard05
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
62
04-16-2003 02:25 PM
