Rising rate fuel pressure regulator VS 1:1 Fuel pressure regulator in boost - rrfpr vs fpr
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mesa (Phoenix), Arizona
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rising rate fuel pressure regulator VS 1:1 Fuel pressure regulator in boost - rrfpr vs fpr
I have seen many people talk crap about rising rate regulators because its a "band air" fix. Now what the hell does that mean, and why is it not the "proper way" to handle boost. If its not, exactly what is the proper way, and does this mean stick with a 1:1 fpr?
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I miss the east coast, TX, USA
Posts: 2,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
a 1:1 FPR just raises fuel pressure one lb per lb of boost.
What everyone is calling a bandaid is an FMU (Fuel Management Unit). It can raise fuel pressure on stock injectors up to 12 lbs per lb of boost. They are not the proper way to tune a car simply because it's a linear rise in fuel pressure that you can't change with rpm. A car doesn't need the same amount of fuel all the way through the rev range so you can be super fat in some areas and dangerously lean in others.
The proper way to do it is to chip and OBD1 ECU and allow the computer to read boost and control a larger injector so you can actually get the AFR dialed in across the board.
What everyone is calling a bandaid is an FMU (Fuel Management Unit). It can raise fuel pressure on stock injectors up to 12 lbs per lb of boost. They are not the proper way to tune a car simply because it's a linear rise in fuel pressure that you can't change with rpm. A car doesn't need the same amount of fuel all the way through the rev range so you can be super fat in some areas and dangerously lean in others.
The proper way to do it is to chip and OBD1 ECU and allow the computer to read boost and control a larger injector so you can actually get the AFR dialed in across the board.
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mesa (Phoenix), Arizona
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Jay_Sensing)
Hmm, so lets see if i got this right...
A fmu will add up to 12:1 fuel pressure for boost pressure. Got that. But i dont understand how its bad for the AFR. I know fuel amounts vary at diff rpm, but isnt it the high rpm the more fuel (assuming wot). How is this going to ever be lean then?
A fmu will add up to 12:1 fuel pressure for boost pressure. Got that. But i dont understand how its bad for the AFR. I know fuel amounts vary at diff rpm, but isnt it the high rpm the more fuel (assuming wot). How is this going to ever be lean then?
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lynnwood, WA, US
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (drumminforev)
with a greddy 15g kit and a 12:1 fmu on a d16a6 at 6psi, afr was 12.9-13.1 basically across the board. and thats a pretty small turbo. imagine a bigger turbo flowing more air at the same boost level. ya its gonna lean out even more. thats not good.
Marcus
Marcus
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Longmont, CO, usa
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (khoalie)
no. like the guy just said, with a tiny *** greddy kit, the 12:1 fmu could not deliver enough fuel. So adding crome cannot magically make your injectors deliver more fuel because stock injectors on a stock map are already close to maxed.
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ndogg)
well i'm assuming ScorpioMk was running a stock ecu therefore having no control over injector pulse length and running some type of missing link/check valves. By using a 3 bar map sensor and using crome to tune injector pulse length, wouldn't this be a viable alternative?
edit: nvm, i just reread your post. didnt realize stock injectors were running at such i high duty cycle already
edit: nvm, i just reread your post. didnt realize stock injectors were running at such i high duty cycle already
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JM Performance
Forced Induction
16
11-28-2001 03:46 PM