Notices

PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2004, 12:24 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
danl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: pa, usa
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better

It seems that nobody has run a PWR radiator in a DSM and given a review of it anywhere. I am fully aware however that a lot of turbo honda people are run PWR equipment and was wondering what your comments are on the two different radiator cooling options.

I can pick up a fluidyne radiator for 350 or a PWR radiator for 349. Both are made to fit in my car. Which one is better and why? Are their any differences in cooling capacities of either? Is the core material/technology different? Are the endtanks connected different?

Old 07-03-2004, 12:28 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
93LSivic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: All around, De/Pa
Posts: 5,608
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (danl)

C&R
Old 07-03-2004, 12:36 PM
  #3  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
danl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: pa, usa
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (93LSivic)

A C&R radiator will run me 475 or 509 with a fan.

Fluidyne advertises 20-30% more cooling with their units. Thats about what its going to take for me to keep things inline for my car. I'm ***-u-ming that the PWR will provide simillar results. I'd like to stick with the fluidyne or PWR because I can get either from a vendor I am comftorable with and the prices are more inline with what I want to be spending.

So what makes a C&R better? Or a Fluidyne or PWR better?
Old 07-03-2004, 12:45 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
fi hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i am going to get a c & R for my car cause i like the fact of the built in fan. If you look at the price of a nice radiator and fan it comes out to the same price as c & R roughly
Old 07-03-2004, 12:47 PM
  #5  
Member
 
sporkcrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: broke in the bay area, CA
Posts: 5,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (fi hatch)

They probably perform just as well as each other.
Old 07-03-2004, 01:38 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
BodyKits NW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Carbon Fiber Land, USA
Posts: 4,468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (sporkcrx)

I have had a Fluidyne and a C&R. I have never puchased a PWR other than their intercooler. I like the C&R. The fitment is a lot better and the slim fan makes it even a easier and better purchase.
Old 07-03-2004, 04:42 PM
  #7  
Pat
Honda-Tech Member
 
Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (BodyKits NW)

I have a PWR rad on my DSM, it cools pretty well even behind a large FMIC when moving. But I did have a problem w/ overheating at idle/traffic until I added another slim fan (can find these 12" fans on ebay for cheap).

The other thing was that the endtank was taller than stock so I could not use the stock radiator brackets on top.
Old 07-03-2004, 05:25 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
pissedoffsol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Pat)

the PWR is superior to the Fluidyne due to its side bolters.
in the event of a headgasket blow out, the side bolsters will support the rad more and have less of an implod effect...
Old 07-03-2004, 05:36 PM
  #9  
Member
 
Armed Ferret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Odenton, MD
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm pretty sure the C&R comes with a FAL slim fan, whereas the PWR and Fluidynes don't.

If you can retain your stock fan and be content, go with one of the slightly less expensive (depending on application) fans. If you're going to need a slim fan, it's probably more cost-effective to just get the C&R. all 3 are very high quality brands and i've never heard or personally experienced anything bad that was the actual manufacturer's or product's fault.
Old 07-03-2004, 09:03 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
FredoSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: SC61ville, Brooklyn, NY/TX, USA
Posts: 10,836
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Armed Ferret)

Earl runs a PWR rad on his 9 sec CRX, Im sure its fine.

I got one too (PWR) great fitment, no problems at all.
Old 07-03-2004, 10:26 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
shermanyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St.Paul, MN
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (FredoSP)

i'm running a PWR rad on my teg. fits perfect along with a FAL fan.
Old 07-04-2004, 05:43 AM
  #12  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
danl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: pa, usa
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Pat)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pat &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have a PWR rad on my DSM, it cools pretty well even behind a large FMIC when moving. But I did have a problem w/ overheating at idle/traffic until I added another slim fan (can find these 12" fans on ebay for cheap).

The other thing was that the endtank was taller than stock so I could not use the stock radiator brackets on top.</TD></TR></TABLE>


Funny thing is even with my stock radiator the car stays cool at idle. Its when I'm climbing hills that the radiator can't get rid of the heat sufficiently enough.
Old 08-06-2004, 12:43 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ketchup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (pissedoffsol)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by pissedoffsol &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the PWR is superior to the Fluidyne due to its side bolters.
in the event of a headgasket blow out, the side bolsters will support the rad more and have less of an implod effect...</TD></TR></TABLE>

what about c&r's ?
Old 08-06-2004, 04:18 PM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Full-Race Geoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: FULL RACE, AZ, USA
Posts: 4,719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (danl)

c&r's are BADASS radiators, super high quality and they come with a fan. PWR are excellent radiators also, and a bit less expensive than the ultra-nice C&R.

fluidynes get wasted when you blow a head gasket, and they are overpriced. Stick with c&r or pwr
Old 08-06-2004, 04:48 PM
  #15  
 
C-Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

C&R over ther others.
Old 08-07-2004, 01:17 AM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
ketchup's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (Full-Race Geoff)

i'm thinking of going with the C&R shorty rad. since i managed to crack the plastic on the cheap stock one.

will the c&r rad work with my stock hf motor ? of course with the proper tubes. i know a high performance rad like the c&r ones aren't needed for a dinky little economy motor like my hf but i plan on dropping a h22 so i figured why not go with it for now.

so if the c&r 'shorty' is my best bet for now, worst case scenario - the h22 turbo setup or manifold won't clear it and i'll have to get a custom rad.

what do you guys think ?
Old 08-07-2004, 04:53 AM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
 
MrSmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: NY
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (ketchup)

I had issues with my C&R so I wouldnt recommend it. Quality is nice and it comes with a fan but the actual radiator part is no thicker than a dual core del sol rad. The fan is placed too far from the fins the way they mount it allowing it to suck air in from the engine bay instead of thru the radiator. If you have a C&R you know what i mean. With my front mount and ac on the other side the temp gauge would start climbing after 30 min of driving ever so slightly. If I didnt have ac I probably wouldnt have had any issues. I have a koyo now the quality is good not as good as the C&R but its a true 2 and whatever inch thick rad no problems since. Another thing with the koyo is you need to buy a separate fan.
Old 08-07-2004, 09:39 AM
  #18  
 
C-Zero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 643
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better (MrSmith)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MrSmith &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I had issues with my C&R so I wouldnt recommend it. Quality is nice and it comes with a fan but the actual radiator part is no thicker than a dual core del sol rad. The fan is placed too far from the fins the way they mount it allowing it to suck air in from the engine bay instead of thru the radiator. If you have a C&R you know what i mean. With my front mount and ac on the other side the temp gauge would start climbing after 30 min of driving ever so slightly. If I didnt have ac I probably wouldnt have had any issues. I have a koyo now the quality is good not as good as the C&R but its a true 2 and whatever inch thick rad no problems since. Another thing with the koyo is you need to buy a separate fan. </TD></TR></TABLE>

What BS . How do you know its something you did'nt do?




Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
prahaian
Forced Induction
28
01-05-2014 01:02 PM
Tootsie7944
Forced Induction
6
02-09-2012 01:56 PM
panda215
Acura Integra Type-R
6
03-09-2009 01:39 PM
allmotorhatch
Drag Racing
8
08-05-2005 10:45 AM



Quick Reply: PWR vs. Fluidyne Radiators which is better



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 PM.