Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS
08-11-2003, 07:31 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Omaha, NE, USA
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS
i went to the mustand dyno this mornin with my turbo LS hatch and was able to pull a 231 hp run at 10 psi...i was just curious what that might equate to on a dynojet dyno because i heard that the mustang dynos rate on the conservative side..i was told that i was hittin around 290 hp at the crank..so any help would b appreciated..thx
08-12-2003, 06:33 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (94goldjungsr)
I dyno'd at 235whp and 214lb ft on a mustand dyno @ 10.5psi 12:1 a/f, was getting detonation at 12.5 with the microphone, made same power at 12:1 anyways.
Trending Topics
08-12-2003, 12:01 PM
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (g2turbo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by g2turbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i made 238 whp on a MD as well. 174 torque. 12 psi ... see sig. air fuel was also around 12:1</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why such low tq numbers?? what turbo/manifold/dp are you running? my roomates d16 made the same tq as you!
Why such low tq numbers?? what turbo/manifold/dp are you running? my roomates d16 made the same tq as you!
08-12-2003, 01:12 PM
#12
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: W.A
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (legendboy)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by legendboy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why such low tq numbers?? what turbo/manifold/dp are you running? my roomates d16 made the same tq as you!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I only made 226whp and 160 ft lbs of tq with 9.5psi....
I know it seems low but my buddy also only made 175whp with 4.5psi on the same dyno (same set-up b16 + t3t4 intercooled)....my a/f ratio was at 12.0
Why such low tq numbers?? what turbo/manifold/dp are you running? my roomates d16 made the same tq as you!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I only made 226whp and 160 ft lbs of tq with 9.5psi....
I know it seems low but my buddy also only made 175whp with 4.5psi on the same dyno (same set-up b16 + t3t4 intercooled)....my a/f ratio was at 12.0
08-12-2003, 01:23 PM
#13
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (dubracr18t)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dubracr18t »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Mustang dynos typically dyno about 15% lower</TD></TR></TABLE>
Can anyone confirm this ?
I did 344 whp / 250 wtq with a GSR at 15 PSI on a Mustang Dyno. so 344 x 1.15 = 395 whp . That seems a little high.
Oh, my trap speed was 117.7 mph on street tires.
Can anyone confirm this ?
I did 344 whp / 250 wtq with a GSR at 15 PSI on a Mustang Dyno. so 344 x 1.15 = 395 whp . That seems a little high.
Oh, my trap speed was 117.7 mph on street tires.
08-12-2003, 01:29 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (meanteg)
Gitwidit also made more torque than my car did with a d16.
I think the reason my numbers were pretty low is becasue of the t04b, and also the fact that my compression is only ~8.8 : 1
I think the reason my numbers were pretty low is becasue of the t04b, and also the fact that my compression is only ~8.8 : 1
08-12-2003, 03:21 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (g2turbo)
maybe, i'm running a t3 (stage 3, .63) / to4b (.60a/r .63 trim wheel)
Are you running a standalone? May i see your maps?
Are you running a standalone? May i see your maps?
08-12-2003, 05:47 PM
#17
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (SIXTYdashONE)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Mustang dynos typically dyno about 15% lower</TD></TR></TABLE>
Doesn't this depend on the dyno operator by how much he decide to correct the torque ?
Cuz my 310whp x 15% = 356whp x drivetrain lost of 15% = 409 crank HP and running 12.39 would be pretty lame with all this power. And even if it's fun to know how much power we have, a dyno is for tuning an engine. Our car will be as fast as they ran, no matter what the dyno says.
Doesn't this depend on the dyno operator by how much he decide to correct the torque ?
Cuz my 310whp x 15% = 356whp x drivetrain lost of 15% = 409 crank HP and running 12.39 would be pretty lame with all this power. And even if it's fun to know how much power we have, a dyno is for tuning an engine. Our car will be as fast as they ran, no matter what the dyno says.
08-12-2003, 08:20 PM
#18
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (Civic TSI)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Civic TSI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Doesn't this depend on the dyno operator by how much he decide to correct the torque ? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know more about that.
Doesn't this depend on the dyno operator by how much he decide to correct the torque ? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'd like to know more about that.
08-13-2003, 04:52 AM
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Montreal, Qc, Canada
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (meanteg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'd like to know more about that. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Just call me you dumbass
Just call me you dumbass
08-13-2003, 07:23 AM
#21
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Albany, NY, USA
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Mustang Dyno numbers...TurboLS (meanteg)
It's hard to give a set correction factor, because some dyno operators will calibrate the dyno to produce dynojet-like figures (ie higher). They do this to please the majority of the public who are just concerned with higher numbers, and understandably a number that they can more easily compare and contrast with others.
Myself, I wouldn't give a crap about the numbers, as long as the tuning was spot on and the car was running good. Numbers are just something to put in your sig
Myself, I wouldn't give a crap about the numbers, as long as the tuning was spot on and the car was running good. Numbers are just something to put in your sig
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post