more hp NA than turbo? wtf?
04-07-2005, 05:40 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: westchester, ny
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
more hp NA than turbo? wtf?
b20 vtec turbo 11.2-1 cr 4psi boost 187hp & 140 tq
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
only difference between na & turbo is the t3/t4 .57 trim turbo
all internal componets the same
help please!
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
only difference between na & turbo is the t3/t4 .57 trim turbo
all internal componets the same
help please!
04-07-2005, 05:41 PM
#2
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: work
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: more hp NA than turbo? wtf? (9341civic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 9341civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b20 vtec turbo 11.2-1 cr 4psi boost 187hp & 140 tq
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
only difference between na & turbo is the t3/t4 .57 trim turbo
all internal componets the same
help please!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't see how this is possible, unless the turbo car had zero timing in it, was running at a 9:1 AFR, no intercooler, and a 2" downpipe.
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
only difference between na & turbo is the t3/t4 .57 trim turbo
all internal componets the same
help please!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't see how this is possible, unless the turbo car had zero timing in it, was running at a 9:1 AFR, no intercooler, and a 2" downpipe.
04-07-2005, 07:59 PM
#5
O.G. triple O.G.
Re: more hp NA than turbo? wtf? (9341civic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 9341civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">b20 vtec turbo 11.2-1 cr 4psi boost 187hp & 140 tq
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Whut....4psi of boost? Who the hell would boost that low wif a T3/T4 57 trim? And why would you slap a turbo on with that kind of compression ratio?! Sounds pointless to me.
na car ran 200hp & 145 tq
wtf?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Whut....4psi of boost? Who the hell would boost that low wif a T3/T4 57 trim? And why would you slap a turbo on with that kind of compression ratio?! Sounds pointless to me.
04-07-2005, 08:18 PM
#6
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: ???????
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: more hp NA than turbo? wtf? (NVturbo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NVturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Whut....4psi of boost? Who the hell would boost that low wif a T3/T4 57 trim? And why would you slap a turbo on with that kind of compression ratio?! Sounds pointless to me.</TD></TR></TABLE>
yea but he still should have made more power. somethings not right.
yea but he still should have made more power. somethings not right.
Trending Topics
04-10-2005, 06:02 AM
#12
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: westchester, ny
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (9341civic)
on my cams the adjustable cam gears are set @ 0 on the intake & 0 on the exhaust
where should they be for a turbo car
the cams that i am using are crower stage 2 (63402)
where should they be for a turbo car
the cams that i am using are crower stage 2 (63402)
04-10-2005, 04:18 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: 909, Ca, US
Posts: 4,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (9341civic)
too much overlap from the cams? CR is really high for a boost setup + everything the same = no change in tuning? then being that advanced for an n/a setup will mess you up when going turbo... danger!
04-10-2005, 07:47 PM
#17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: westchester, ny
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (SHystrdyGSRtdy)
i used the same tuner for both the na setup & the current turbo setup
i made less power on the dyno with the turbo setup @4psi
today i reinstalled the 7psi spring in the wastegate and it feels healthier
, but still needs to be tuned more
ems 1010 ver1.11
i made less power on the dyno with the turbo setup @4psi
today i reinstalled the 7psi spring in the wastegate and it feels healthier
, but still needs to be tuned moreems 1010 ver1.11
04-12-2005, 04:33 PM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (9341civic)
Sounds like horrible tuning. Any more info on the setup? a/f ration? base maps?...
BTW Take pictures when you pull shards of the pistons out of the pavement and hood.
BTW Take pictures when you pull shards of the pistons out of the pavement and hood.
04-12-2005, 04:38 PM
#21
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bloomfield Hills, MI, USA
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (xtremeazian)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xtremeazian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">that turbo doesnt even come alive till after 9-10psi.</TD></TR></TABLE>
da trooth
da trooth
04-12-2005, 05:29 PM
#23
Member
Re: (9341civic)
Try retarding the in-boost timing. When the mixture gets thicker it takes longer for the flame to spread.
Also, you may be misfiring. You should be using plugs a step colder than before and gapped at 0.030" or so.
Also, you may be misfiring. You should be using plugs a step colder than before and gapped at 0.030" or so.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post