Notices

LS vs GSR spool time (same turbo, manifold, downpipe, exhaust ect)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2004, 01:15 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Charlie Moua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LS vs GSR spool time (same turbo, manifold, downpipe, exhaust ect)

ok i wanted to now which would spool faster.
The gsr gas higher compression however the LS has longer stroke for displacement and lower compression.
so.... which would spool faster

stock ls longblock
drag III kit

vs

stock gsr longblock
drag III kit

This has been pissing me off all day cause i didn't know the answer and the reason why..

Old 07-21-2004, 02:43 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
importfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: phoenix, az, usa
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LS vs GSR spool time (Charlie Moua)

the gsr should spool faster with it having a higher compersion theres less cylinder volume to fill up which means faster exhuast flow to bring that turbo to full spool, when you have lower compersion theres alot of cylinder left to fill up which mean more time it takes to fill up that space
Old 07-21-2004, 03:36 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Patron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Here, Here
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LS vs GSR spool time (importfan2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by importfan2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the gsr should spool faster with it having a higher compersion theres less cylinder volume to fill up which means faster exhuast flow to bring that turbo to full spool, when you have lower compersion theres alot of cylinder left to fill up which mean more time it takes to fill up that space </TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm gonna have to disagree with you, the LS has a slight edge in displacement, and actually flows more exhaust volume on the low end versus the GSR, thus why it spools faster.
Old 07-21-2004, 06:03 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
mrbsponge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: TDCperformance.net
Posts: 4,103
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

im gonna say LS as well due to the LS making more low end torque hence they have all large primary cam lobes and move more air, and we vtec motors are stuck with the off vtec lobes and dont move as much air hence spooling slower.....

look at how much faster you make boost when in vtec
Old 07-21-2004, 06:08 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
shermanyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St.Paul, MN
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (mrbsponge)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrbsponge &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">im gonna say LS as well due to the LS making more low end torque hence they have all large primary cam lobes and move more air, and we vtec motors are stuck with the off vtec lobes and dont move as much air hence spooling slower.....

look at how much faster you make boost when in vtec</TD></TR></TABLE>


Old 07-21-2004, 08:49 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
Charlie Moua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (shermanyang)

thanks for the great simple insite!
Old 07-21-2004, 09:03 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Mase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Swamp, FL
Posts: 7,139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LS vs GSR spool time (Charlie Moua)

great thread.

ive done a test using the same setup on a gsr and ls. ls spooled quicker, but not by much.
Old 07-21-2004, 09:08 PM
  #8  
the son and the heir
iTrader: (1)
 
macrosshn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: dreaming of the Gulf Coast, USA
Posts: 13,698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LS vs GSR spool time (Mase)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mase &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">great thread.

ive done a test using the same setup on a gsr and ls. ls spooled quicker, but not by much. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I would've never thought the ls would spool quicker.

I thought the better flowing GSR head would help but being that it is early spool versus late, the benefits of the GSR head is negligible.
Old 07-22-2004, 05:01 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Rah Rah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Jersey, USA
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: LS vs GSR spool time (macrosshn)

GSR's advantage is it's top-end flow.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trooper0641
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
35
03-21-2004 12:21 PM
95SniperSi
Acura Integra
12
12-08-2003 05:09 AM
icelarry27
Forced Induction
24
06-04-2003 01:07 AM
OriginalOboby
Acura Integra
6
06-06-2002 02:29 PM
dc516
Forced Induction
5
06-19-2001 09:38 AM



Quick Reply: LS vs GSR spool time (same turbo, manifold, downpipe, exhaust ect)



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:31 AM.