Notices

Lovefab ac mini-me vs. RLD-fab ramhorn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2007, 02:26 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lovefab ac mini-me vs. RLD-fab ramhorn

Lovefab ac mini-me vs. RLD-fab ramhorn

I am deciding between the two. Definately want to keep the <U>a/c and p/s.</U>
Going with a GT2871R turbo. B18C motor in an ek chassis. aiming for 400hp.
reason why i picked these two is because of the price range similarity.
want know know whats a better bang for the buck in terms of manifold design,
performance and quality/reliabilty.
please throw in some helpful opinions and/or suggestions

LOVEFAB
RLD-Fab

LOVEFAB


RLD-fab
Old 02-11-2007, 05:37 PM
  #2  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
patrick4588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warner Robins, GA, US
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

turbo may run out of breath before 400whp.
Old 02-11-2007, 05:43 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
mike93eh2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: missouri
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if i had to choose between them two i would definetly choose the RLD fab ramhorn.

i have one of his ramhorns and the quality is next to full race and im not bullshitting you. and he has damn good prices also with good shipping times.
Old 02-11-2007, 05:52 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
JDM_EH2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (mike93eh2)

RLD Fab Before I went FR...I spoke with him a few times through PMs and he was VERY helpful.
Old 02-11-2007, 06:25 PM
  #5  
something different
 
redzcstandardhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: grand rapids/chicago, usa
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (JDM_EH2)

we just ordered a lovefab mini-me AC compatable for a SOHC we're building.... looking forward to it.

Cody from lovefab is a good guy, who builds nice stuff.. especially for the money

the RLD looks good too.

the two manifolds arent really identical designs, so its kind of silly to compare them (although both are rather unique).i think either of them could make very similar power levels, and could easily do 400 whp.
Old 02-11-2007, 06:29 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Boostin Ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: La, Us
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (redzcstandardhatch)

I have a rld-fab i would recomend him to anyone manifold is great and his customer service is excelent.
Old 02-11-2007, 06:39 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Boostin Ex)

thanks for the inputs

i am pretty sure the fab work if not the same, is very similar, both guys seem to be very skilled. but i was curious more about the design factor, considering one is ramhorn and the other isnt. so interms of performance which one would be a better way to go?

the ac mini-me is pretty close to equal lenght and shorter runners so i was thinking mite give a faster spool compared to ramhorn. wasnt certain thats why i decided to post and squeez out some experienced opinions.
Old 02-12-2007, 04:48 AM
  #8  
something different
 
redzcstandardhatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: grand rapids/chicago, usa
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (armash)

i dont think you will have too much of a difference from either manifold.

Old 02-12-2007, 04:55 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
93supercoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dont Steal My Car, Ct, USA
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (redzcstandardhatch)

i agree, jusr find the one that suits ur needs and go with it.
Old 02-12-2007, 05:25 AM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
DaveF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Lansdale, PA
Posts: 16,905
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: (93supercoupe)

go with the RLD manifold. there is more of a collector, and should help control boost better, than the short collector.
Old 02-12-2007, 09:00 PM
  #11  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (dturbocivic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dturbocivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> go with the RLD manifold. there is more of a collector, and should help control boost better, than the short collector.</TD></TR></TABLE>

makes sense !

what abt the dump pipe and downpipe curvature and lenght. will that be a huge factor ?
Old 02-12-2007, 09:22 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (armash)

Cody used to make a big ram-horn manifold like that, called it a SST. I had one, beautiful manifold, very well made. I'd have to go back through a few years of e-mail, but I think that he said that the Mini-Me performed about the same on the dyno on a street car. I sold it a while ago, I think the guy that bought it is still running it.
Old 02-12-2007, 09:31 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Cody used to make a big ram-horn manifold like that, called it a SST. I had one, beautiful manifold, very well made. I'd have to go back through a few years of e-mail, but I think that he said that the Mini-Me performed about the same on the dyno on a street car. I sold it a while ago, I think the guy that bought it is still running it. </TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah because one of my main concerns is a/c and p/s retention and i think the sst isnt a/c compatible ...
Old 02-13-2007, 05:05 AM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (armash)

My SST was AC and PS compatible, technically. I had to modify the AC fan and lines, plus modify the PS bracket. If I did it again, then I'd go with a mini-me, about the same performance and much less metal under the hood. We did pick up 26 WHP on the dyno when I changed out my old Inline Pro cast manifold for the SST though, 354 WHP to 380 WHP on the same boost.


*Edited - Dyslexia owns me*


Modified by rmcdaniels at 10:28 AM 2/16/2007
Old 02-13-2007, 05:07 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Mr.60trim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: What Business is it of yours where Im from Friendo
Posts: 1,000
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (patrick4588)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by patrick4588 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">turbo may run out of breath before 400whp. </TD></TR></TABLE>
.
Old 02-13-2007, 05:43 AM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
DeltaCharlie2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northeast FL, USmuthafknA
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Team_Carnage)

Just based on looks, I like the RLD-fab mani better. I like the ramhorn style runners compared to the short ones on the LOVEFAB.

Also, I like the fact that RLD-fab threw in a section of flex-piping on the dumptube to prevent it from cracking.
Old 02-13-2007, 06:13 AM
  #17  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (patrick4588)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by patrick4588 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">turbo may run out of breath before 400whp. </TD></TR></TABLE>

yeah i realise that. thanks for pointing it out.
im still debating between the 2871r and the 3071r but i think 2871r might
be the one as long as i can get 370ish hp out of it eventually. initially i only want
300hp.

manifold was a bigger concern for me at the moment because of fitment issues
and being really tight on funds, i just wanted to make sure i invest in something
worthwhile lol. and thers like a month turn aorund time before i get it shipped
Old 02-13-2007, 06:16 AM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Cody used to make a big ram-horn manifold like that, called it a SST. I had one, beautiful manifold, very well made. I'd have to go back through a few years of e-mail, but I think that he said that the Mini-Me performed about the same on the dyno on a street car. I sold it a while ago, I think the guy that bought it is still running it. </TD></TR></TABLE>

i really wana keep the cutting/shaving to the minimum just for ease sake, plus i dont have the right tools and taking it to the shop means more time and money which i would like to save as much as possible

rmcdaniels it would be moree than great if you could throw in some dyno sheet or some info about the mini-me vs. sst or something along those lines.
i really do like the mini-me ac cuz of the smaller size and fitment but i didnt wana comprimise on the performance
Old 02-16-2007, 06:16 AM
  #19  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
armash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: mississauga, on, canada
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Re (armash)

bump
Old 02-16-2007, 06:25 AM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: Re (armash)

I never did mini-me vs. ramhorn, just ramhorn vs. cast (Inline Pro SS):

Inline Pro cast:




Lovefab SST ramhorn, A/C compatible, 3" downpipe. Same motor, boost, tuner, etc. Clutch was slipping up top, it made 380 after I replaced the clutch, I just never got a copy of that plot:




You can ask Cody about ramhorn vs. Mini-Me, he's dyno'd them.

Old 02-16-2007, 06:50 AM
  #21  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
patrick4588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warner Robins, GA, US
Posts: 2,837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would go with the 3071r. the t28 just wont make the power you want. it will run out of breath.
Old 02-16-2007, 06:57 AM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (patrick4588)

The dyno charts that I posted were with a GT28RS, here's one of the same setup with a GT3071R:




That got me higher trap speeds, but lower ET's. All in all, I preferred my GT28RS &gt; ALL for daily driving and weekend track use.

That was also with crappy B16 cams, a set of ITR cams should get you 30-40 WHP more with that setup (guy that I know built that same setup with ITR cams and made over 60 WHP more on the same boost, but with a bigger turbo).
Old 02-16-2007, 07:14 AM
  #23  
Man U FTW
 
Schister66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

making a return line for either of those looks like a chore....good luck w/ either one you pick, but if i were buying this, i would get the RLD Ramhorn, but i also would have ditched AC...that makes life sooo much easier
Old 02-16-2007, 08:32 AM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blaze the chemi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: All over ATL
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (rmcdaniels)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rmcdaniels &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...
That was also with crappy B16 cams, a set of ITR cams should get you 30-40 WHP more with that setup (guy that I know built that same setup with ITR cams and made over 60 WHP more on the same boost, but with a bigger turbo).</TD></TR></TABLE>
Is this also on a B18C block standard bore? It looks like either of these setups would be great to replace my greddy kit. I autox and will begin to track my car so I would definitely get either the GT28xx or GT30xx.
Old 02-16-2007, 10:01 AM
  #25  
Honda-Tech Member
 
rmcdaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Posts: 4,669
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Re: (blaze the chemi)

B16, sleeved, 84mm bore, 8.5:1 CR


Quick Reply: Lovefab ac mini-me vs. RLD-fab ramhorn



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 AM.