Just got back from the Dyno: Turbo D16z6
03-19-2005, 04:01 PM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just got back from the Dyno: Turbo D16z6
Hello,
Here is more info on the setup.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1157456
This run was at about 9-10psi. From the other dynos i've seen, I guess it would be considered about average or perhaps a little low. Please tell me what u guys think. Any tips would be appreciated.
Here is more info on the setup.
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1157456
This run was at about 9-10psi. From the other dynos i've seen, I guess it would be considered about average or perhaps a little low. Please tell me what u guys think. Any tips would be appreciated.
03-19-2005, 04:12 PM
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Tchleung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think you wouda been happier with the GT28RS with .63 T3 Drop in IMO. But the numbers are still nice overall</TD></TR></TABLE>
Hehe funny thing ATP offered to switch it out for me. Me and a friend argued about it for a whole day. He wanted me to keep the 2871r while i wanted to switch for the RS. As you can tell he won. Either way the car pulls great. Its just nice to be able to put a Number to the feeling.
Hehe funny thing ATP offered to switch it out for me. Me and a friend argued about it for a whole day. He wanted me to keep the 2871r while i wanted to switch for the RS. As you can tell he won. Either way the car pulls great. Its just nice to be able to put a Number to the feeling.
03-19-2005, 04:20 PM
#5
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Tchleung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Exactly. both are great turbos. congratulatinos on finally getting the setup going! Feels good don't it? 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah it does feel great. It was pulling so hard the Butt dyno had it some where around 230-235. Now that we know its only putting down 210. I'm actually kind of fearfull of my 300hp goal. Can't imagine what it would feel like. I'm gonna keep it this way for a month or so then get a EBC and some dipers.
Modified by eddyboy at 5:30 PM 3/19/2005
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yeah it does feel great. It was pulling so hard the Butt dyno had it some where around 230-235. Now that we know its only putting down 210. I'm actually kind of fearfull of my 300hp goal. Can't imagine what it would feel like. I'm gonna keep it this way for a month or so then get a EBC and some dipers.
Modified by eddyboy at 5:30 PM 3/19/2005
03-19-2005, 04:40 PM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LOL. Get the oens witht he extra side support flaps so it can hold more. haha :D How much bosot you hoping to run to achieve 300WHP? 15ish? That's a good torque curve tho. still surpirsed torque curve is fallnig off. Wonder how it'll be on my B16..
Trending Topics
03-19-2005, 04:45 PM
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Tchleung)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">LOL. Get the oens witht he extra side support flaps so it can hold more. haha :D How much bosot you hoping to run to achieve 300WHP? 15ish? That's a good torque curve tho. still surpirsed torque curve is fallnig off. Wonder how it'll be on my B16..</TD></TR></TABLE>
I aiming for 15ish. But I doubt i'll hit 300. The way the cars is pulling I'd be happy if I hit 260-280.
Hopefully u guys can help my analyze the dyno graph cause this is my first attempt at tuning. I've done alot of reading but any tips u guys can offer would be great. What so strange about the torque curve? Please enlighten me.
I aiming for 15ish. But I doubt i'll hit 300. The way the cars is pulling I'd be happy if I hit 260-280.
Hopefully u guys can help my analyze the dyno graph cause this is my first attempt at tuning. I've done alot of reading but any tips u guys can offer would be great. What so strange about the torque curve? Please enlighten me.
03-19-2005, 04:47 PM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh no nothing is wrong at all with the torque curve. I just wasn't sure if the torque would still drop down after peak torque like on the larger displacement engines.
03-19-2005, 07:08 PM
#13
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: san jose, ca, US
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just got back from the Dyno: Turbo D16z6 (eddyboy)
Dam...butt dyno is a bitch, specially with them skinny cheeks of yours. lol!!
See now you know what 200 whp feels like. Time to crank that boost up sir!
The only reason I wanted you to keep the 2871r is because your whp goal would be easier to reach
See now you know what 200 whp feels like. Time to crank that boost up sir!
The only reason I wanted you to keep the 2871r is because your whp goal would be easier to reach
03-19-2005, 08:10 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Louisville, KY, 40222
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Just got back from the Dyno: Turbo D16z6 (D-booster)
Very nice numbers. Ill be running the RS here in a couple week. I hope to hit 215whp on 7-8lbs.
03-19-2005, 10:01 PM
#18
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (96-EJ6 B18C)
Hey, you gotta think about the true essence of the butt dyno. It is a possibility that you're *** was reading hp at the flywheel, in which case you were close to 230-235. The problem seems to be with your head, as your *** seems to be accurtate. 
Nice numbers!
Nice numbers!
03-19-2005, 10:15 PM
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: skeet skeet
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (booscivic)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by booscivic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice #, now raise the boost!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RA166E »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What was your timing at?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would like to know also
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RA166E »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What was your timing at?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would like to know also
03-20-2005, 02:52 AM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: san jose, ca, US
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (2000civicsi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2000civicsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I would like to know also</TD></TR></TABLE>
timming was @ 20 degree
I would like to know also</TD></TR></TABLE>
timming was @ 20 degree
03-20-2005, 09:31 AM
#22
Honda-Tech Member
here is a comparison with a gt28rs
http://www.evans-tuning.com/viewtopic.php?t=1391
can't really compare since they are using an equal length
http://www.evans-tuning.com/viewtopic.php?t=1391
can't really compare since they are using an equal length
03-20-2005, 09:40 AM
#23
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow lol. I voerlapepd the two and theya re nearly identical. Only time the GT28RS rises higher is around 5000 RPM and up at same bosot level.
But then you bring in the fact that A:
GT2871R has the .63 Log manifold
and
GT28RS has the .82 Equal length manifold. I would assume the manifold and the larger turbine housing A/R made up for the smalelr compressor wheel
very itneresting
But then you bring in the fact that A:
GT2871R has the .63 Log manifold
and
GT28RS has the .82 Equal length manifold. I would assume the manifold and the larger turbine housing A/R made up for the smalelr compressor wheel
very itneresting
03-20-2005, 09:42 AM
#24
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Penticton, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also noticed that it looks like the GT28RS setup hits 10PSI 500RPM earlier and carries the pwoerband ncier then the 2871R. Maybe because of the .63AR choice..Ity's really hard to compare as that 28rs setup had a turbo cam as well...
Modified by Tchleung at 11:04 AM 3/20/2005
Modified by Tchleung at 11:04 AM 3/20/2005
