Notices

ITR vs Skunk2 Stage1 cams for boost.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2004, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
PIC Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default ITR vs Skunk2 Stage1 cams for boost.

Somewhere down the road, I want to put together a turbo setup for my b18c1. At this point though, I can't really afford to jump into the project yet, but I would like some more power. I figure the best thing to do then is to get some cams and an IM, since they will give some decent power gains in addition to my i/h/e, and I can use them with my turbo setup as well down the road.
The cams I am thinking of getting are some 00/01 ITR cams, and a Skunk2 IM. But I'm also thinking Skunk2 S1 cams... on the exhaust side, they have 14 degrees more duration than the ITR cams. Would that be too much duration for a boosted motor? Should I just stick with the ITR's? I'm thinking that if I can find the S2 S1's cheap enough, then I would like the nicer top-end power of the S2's.
What do you guys think?
Old 12-01-2004, 07:11 PM
  #2  
 
ssr_h22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockport, tx, us
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i would go itr. or ctr. i talked to alaniz ( one of the best with head work) he said use something mild. he told me to go with itr on my gsr turbo.
Old 12-01-2004, 07:18 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
PIC Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (ssr_h22)

So I hear. But then again, the Skunk2 is not that far off from ITR cams in terms of specs, but it looks like they produce noticeably better gains in NA form. Would that mean better turbo gains as well? I don't think they would be considered "aggressive" cams at all.
Old 12-02-2004, 11:22 AM
  #4  
 
ssr_h22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockport, tx, us
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

skunk2 in more na. just like there intake manifolds. i would stick to honda/acura. this is wat alaniz told me. i would want something mild. i am going for a 500whp build. fully built bottom end and all headwork.
Old 12-02-2004, 01:45 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
XxRoCkMaNxNEOxX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (ssr_h22)

what would be best for a b16a2 , ctr or itr thinking about raising the valve train to go to 9k
Old 12-02-2004, 02:22 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
SOUNDEFFECTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lost in turbo world, Florida
Posts: 1,321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (XxRoCkMaNxNEOxX)

I would be willing to bet that if you got some SK 1 cams that you wouldnnot lose any power over ITR cams if you compared both on a med turbo setup
Old 12-02-2004, 02:44 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
PIC Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (SOUNDEFFECTS)

Thats what I am thinking as well. And while not turboed, they would still make more power NA than ITR/CTR cams, which is whats appealing to me.
Old 12-02-2004, 03:24 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
BlackSage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Africa
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Noob4life)

I say go itr because nobody has any feedback on the skunk cams and boost. Hell maybe you should try it and show us your reseults. itr cams would be the safer route but maybe the skunk cams will produce good results.

let us know
Old 12-02-2004, 04:16 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Boostage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,711
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (BlackSage)

I have no data but I have a strong feelin tht a s2 stage 1 will hit very hard and pull very high once overlap is fixed. but I dont know if it will wear teh springs out faster.
Old 12-02-2004, 04:49 PM
  #10  
 
spoon23_JDizM AkA SpOoN20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: hittin switches on bitches..., 92201
Posts: 22,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Boostage)

good question
Old 12-02-2004, 06:46 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
PIC Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: IL, USA
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Boostage)

HHHMM... very good point. Boost might really exaggerate the stage 1's aggressiveness, and while a stock valvetrain would be OK with NA, I might need to upgrade for boost.
BlackSage: Heh, you won't find any guinea pigs here, I'm too poor to experiment.
Old 12-06-2004, 11:54 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
calvinPGMFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: eCtune Dev country, SR
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Noob4life)

How do you dail the overlap away.
Adv/Retard the intake and/or exhaust.

Thanks for your help
Calvin
Old 12-07-2004, 06:45 AM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
calvinPGMFI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: eCtune Dev country, SR
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (calvinPGMFI)

bump
Old 12-07-2004, 08:00 AM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
{Mineral Grey} ITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 605/405/91 Freeways, CA, 90703
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (calvinPGMFI)

Thinking about going the same route......let us know your final decision!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lovebench
Acura Integra
6
01-27-2007 06:48 PM
Sparkles
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
15
11-21-2006 09:48 AM
the.hamburglar
Forced Induction
32
10-29-2006 11:12 AM
undagroundrican
Acura Integra
1
08-12-2004 10:51 PM
cyrock
Tech / Misc
2
06-28-2004 11:30 AM



Quick Reply: ITR vs Skunk2 Stage1 cams for boost.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM.