Notices

GT37R versus GT3788R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2010, 02:40 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default GT37R versus GT3788R

searching turbos and want to see which one is bigger and better, I am not sure if they are the exact turbos, I currently have a t3/t67 and I wanna change to something ball bearing, but wanna keep same size or bigger in a t3 flange.
Old 01-22-2010, 05:00 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
2.0L_of_fun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

if it'is becaue of your manifold. just sell it and buy one with the flange you need!!!
Old 01-22-2010, 05:36 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
96 GSR-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Full-Race calls a Ball Bearing T3/T67ho a GT37R.... in T3 form they can make 700-750hp depending on the dyno..... I am selling one right now that only has one pass on it.

The GT3788R has the same Comp wheel as a GT40R but with a smaller Turbine wheel, Garrett rates it at 675hp.... and as far as I know its divided T4 only
Old 01-22-2010, 06:14 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Turbo-LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South, Texas
Posts: 12,903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

From what iuve gathered the gt37 is more of a diesel application and the wheel combinations dont work as well as a better thought out turbo system. thats what ive read and got from dealers.

the t3/t67ho is where its at IMO. the ball bearing is only going to give you a little better spool its more respool thats effected by ballbearing turbos. Alot of peopel are going with precisions new 6265 billet and making t67 power and they are offered in bb
Old 01-22-2010, 06:33 PM
  #5  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Originally Posted by Turbo-LS
the ball bearing is only going to give you a little better spool its more respool thats effected by ballbearing turbos.
Unfortunately, many tests and feedback over the years have showed that there was no increased "spool" between the 2 versions.
Old 01-22-2010, 06:43 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
96 GSR-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Originally Posted by TheShodan
Unfortunately, many tests and feedback over the years have showed that there was no increased "spool" between the 2 versions.
Thats odd, why did my 8.2:1 GSR cammed 1.8L with a BB 67ho outspool my friends 9.5:1 true 2.0L with a journal 67 stg5 wheel by a good 500rpm? The rest of the setup was identical........ not a true back to back test but it has to mean something.

Wouldnt the rather large increase in displacement, higher compression and slightly smaller turbine wheel help spool alot?
Old 01-23-2010, 12:36 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Originally Posted by 2.0L_of_fun
if it'is becaue of your manifold. just sell it and buy one with the flange you need!!!
no need for a t4 manifold on a street car, the t3 frame is enough for now.

quote:Turbo-LS
I will never again use any turbos touched by precision, bad experience shitty customer service.

quote:96 GSR-T
thanks that answered my question.

to all my only reason for searcing this turbo is not for a quicker spool up, its only because I want a more reliable turbo that will withstand the long autobahn drives, water cooled, better oiling, therefore ball bearing. my t67 is burning a little oil and some play.
Old 01-23-2010, 02:13 PM
  #8  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Originally Posted by 96 GSR-T
Thats odd, why did my 8.2:1 GSR cammed 1.8L with a BB 67ho outspool my friends 9.5:1 true 2.0L with a journal 67 stg5 wheel by a good 500rpm? The rest of the setup was identical........ not a true back to back test but it has to mean something.

Wouldnt the rather large increase in displacement, higher compression and slightly smaller turbine wheel help spool alot?
And you were using the exact same amount of pressure for each car?. To answer your other question. 1) No. the stage 5 and P-trim don't affect "spool" as much as top end power.. even then, the differences are slight. 2) 1.8 vs. 2.0 litre looks more at torque than power (if he is a true 2.0 litre--many mistaken an 84mm GS-R as a 2.0 litre.) 3) the higher compression helps with TRANSIENT response off-boost between gears. There were other factors than "spool" that were at work with your example here.
Old 01-23-2010, 02:31 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
96 GSR-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Yes same boost pressure..... 21-23psi

1) but there is a difference correct?
2) 85x89 is a true 2.0L, so your saying increasing displacement does not decrease spool time?
3) higher compression increases power off boost and responce and shouldnt that equate to "coming into boost" a little faster?

IDK what other factors you mean....... it dont really matter but if you want to continue please feel free to pm me.
Old 01-23-2010, 07:38 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
 
K7-1Ktrevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Salem, Or
Posts: 5,382
Likes: 0
Received 36 Likes on 35 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

manifold type and exhaust setup would come into play.
Old 01-23-2010, 08:49 PM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
96 GSR-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 6,381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

Originally Posted by K7-1Ktrevor
manifold type and exhaust setup would come into play.
I already stated everything else was the same, both had matching ramhorns and 3" DP's w/ 3" Thermal Exhausts....lol
Old 01-24-2010, 11:40 AM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
rudebwoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: GT37R versus GT3788R

my t3/t67 journal bearing turbo spools real fast on a 2.0l motor, spool up time it over rated for bb turbos. but from what I've between shift response is where a bb performed, plus its more reliable. I launch at 6500rpm so thats way above spool time, does not matter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SD-ek
Classifieds: Forced Induction
17
09-29-2011 04:10 PM
reactiondc2
Classifieds: Forced Induction
28
10-05-2007 07:33 PM
integraboosted
Forced Induction
7
12-26-2005 01:06 AM
IGotVTECyo
Forced Induction
2
10-24-2005 01:06 AM
mrbsponge
Forced Induction
28
11-17-2004 04:43 PM



Quick Reply: GT37R versus GT3788R



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 AM.