Notices

gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010, 10:25 AM
  #1  
on1
Thread Starter
 
on1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

hey, Im building a b16 with

81.5 bore
wiseco 8.8-1 pistons
eagle rods
skunk2 pro springs and ti. retainers
skunk2 tuner1's
skunk2 pro cam gears
skunk2 intake and 70mm throttlebody
mild port and polish
arp main and head studs
hondata s300
plx wideband
and probably a top mount or ramhorn manifold

and i wanted to know your opinions on a gt3076r with the 2 different turbine housings. I have read on there threads that "oh the .63 chokes at higher rpms and lacks power, and the .82 takes about 700-800 rpms longer to spool but good power top end."

my goals are about 400 hp, a streetable car that will last a while. and boost kick in about 4000 rpm and have nice power all the way through 9000 rpm. i would appreciate your thoughts and opinions before i go drop a few grand on a turbo setup that i dont like. and if you can recommend a turbo manifold and exhaust that aint to crazy on price. thanks
Old 02-18-2010, 11:05 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Alfa Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Go with a .78 twinscroll. It will help on both fronts. Why the GT3076 if you only want 400HP? The GT3071 will do it better for your goals.
Old 02-18-2010, 11:29 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,216
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by Alfa Turbo
Go with a .78 twinscroll. It will help on both fronts. Why the GT3076 if you only want 400HP? The GT3071 will do it better for your goals.
He'll be pushing the 3071, and the 3076 will spool practically just as quickly.
Old 02-18-2010, 12:21 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
E85B18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

The .63 will easily get you 400. I made 430 with the .63 on 91 octane with GSR cams @18psi. No need for the .82, enjoy the better spool!
Old 02-18-2010, 04:48 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
intense4thgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: barrie, canada
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

a .63 i think is perfect for what you want, spool by 3500 13 psi on pretty much same spec motor made 380 and 284trq and at 16psi made 423 300trq.
Old 02-18-2010, 06:32 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by Alfa Turbo
Go with a .78 twinscroll. It will help on both fronts. Why the GT3076 if you only want 400HP? The GT3071 will do it better for your goals.
We have found that the .78A/R divided did not perform with the same expectations at all as claimed. It was a bit like having between a .48A/R and .63 A/R open housing, but "spool" was very little affected and did not improve
Old 02-19-2010, 05:24 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Seraph0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: TX, USA
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by TheShodan
We have found that the .78A/R divided did not perform with the same expectations at all as claimed. It was a bit like having between a .48A/R and .63 A/R open housing, but "spool" was very little affected and did not improve
I'm assuming the test with the divided housing was done with a proper manifold for it?
Old 02-19-2010, 05:38 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Alfa Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by TheShodan
We have found that the .78A/R divided did not perform with the same expectations at all as claimed. It was a bit like having between a .48A/R and .63 A/R open housing, but "spool" was very little affected and did not improve
I don't follow you.

Do you mean it spooled as though it was a smaller housing (i.e. quicker onset) or that top end was restricted? Or possibly both?

I see Garrett now offers two larger T3 based TS housings now, have you had time to play with these?

I once had a TS T4 .58 powering a T04-B S3 compressor on a 2.0 and it worked pretty well. T3 TS stuff was years away and the T04 housing was too big even though it was the smallest available. The GT series it has now is MUCH better but TS was pretty advanced for 1996 on a street car!
Old 02-19-2010, 10:32 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ScorpionT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

In my experience, the smaller housings dont spool a whole lot quicker, but top end power is noticeably different.
Old 02-19-2010, 12:00 PM
  #10  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by Seraph0
I'm assuming the test with the divided housing was done with a proper manifold for it?
Why would it not? That turbine flange BTW is a bit difficult to find independently. Unfortunately, most purchasers of the turbo do not have such a flange divded and T3, so one cannot exactly duplicate that result. As a matter of course, whether or not they were completely matched showed insignificant difference for "spool up" and response.
Old 02-19-2010, 12:02 PM
  #11  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by Alfa Turbo
I don't follow you.

Do you mean it spooled as though it was a smaller housing (i.e. quicker onset) or that top end was restricted? Or possibly both?

I see Garrett now offers two larger T3 based TS housings now, have you had time to play with these?

I once had a TS T4 .58 powering a T04-B S3 compressor on a 2.0 and it worked pretty well. T3 TS stuff was years away and the T04 housing was too big even though it was the smallest available. The GT series it has now is MUCH better but TS was pretty advanced for 1996 on a street car!
It spooled slightly better than a smaller .48A/R but not by much. Nor was there any better top end than a .63A/R

for your "TS" comment. the GT series was much better even in the larger housings because the aerodynamics was better. Not due to the housing change to Divided.
Old 02-19-2010, 01:22 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Alfa Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by TheShodan
It spooled slightly better than a smaller .48A/R but not by much. Nor was there any better top end than a .63A/R
For someone in the market for the power level a .63 A/R picking up boost onset and keeping top end would be a good thing.

Originally Posted by TheShodan
for your "TS" comment. the GT series was much better even in the larger housings because the aerodynamics was better. Not due to the housing change to Divided.
Of course, did not mean to say otherwise.
Old 02-19-2010, 01:24 PM
  #13  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Understood. The OP should stay with the .63 in this instance
Old 02-20-2010, 12:37 AM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
hondaapi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: magdeburg, saxony, germany
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

We usually use the .63AR (3071) on most of our cars. The spoolup and throttle response is really great. We like it very much. The power output we made on most cars was something between 400-450hp on consersative tunes.

Maybe a little offtopic. Has someone a comparison between a 3071 vs 3076 with the same A/R?
Old 02-20-2010, 04:26 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Kyle R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoVa
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by E85B18
The .63 will easily get you 400.
Old 02-20-2010, 06:08 AM
  #16  
B.
400 HP Club
 
B.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kills, Canada
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

my setup is proof that the .63 will get you the 400 you're looking for.

and im only running about 12psi to boot.
Old 02-20-2010, 06:27 AM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Kyle R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoVa
Posts: 4,849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

^Nice numbers.
Old 02-20-2010, 05:54 PM
  #18  
on1
Thread Starter
 
on1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

thanks for the responses. ill prbably go for the .63 ar since you guys have had good results it looks like. any recommendations on a manifold and exhaust? also what cooler are you guys running? thanks for the help
Old 02-20-2010, 06:07 PM
  #19  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Intercooler. Many companies that work. there isn't just one that works with that turbocharger. Exhaust manifold is what you make of it. Check the FAQs on the top of the forum regarding the types of manifolds there are available and what would work for you.
Old 02-20-2010, 07:39 PM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
 
eg:R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ca, usa
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

what about the gt3080? is this turbo any better than the gt3076
Old 02-20-2010, 07:50 PM
  #21  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,551
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Are you referring to the GT3082R? (GT3040R). It has the compressor wheel of the GT35R with the turbine wheel of the 3076R. I have found it to be rather mediocre for its purpose.
Old 02-21-2010, 01:57 AM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
eg:R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: ca, usa
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar

Originally Posted by TheShodan
Are you referring to the GT3082R? (GT3040R). It has the compressor wheel of the GT35R with the turbine wheel of the 3076R. I have found it to be rather mediocre for its purpose.
yeah the gt3040R...anyone have or try this one?? wouldnt it make power as a gt35r and spool as a 30R? anyone have dyno #'s with this turbo? i dont hear too much about it as the 3071 to 3076...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brandeezy1
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
16
07-09-2012 06:28 PM
on1
Forced Induction
7
01-21-2010 06:58 PM
nytosc
Forced Induction
7
04-06-2009 01:16 PM
AL ASPIRATED
Tech / Misc
3
01-08-2004 04:42 PM
EVLTEK
Acura Integra
3
11-04-2003 06:58 AM



Quick Reply: gt3076r .63ar vs .82ar



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 AM.