gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
#2
GDD's Dr. Phil?
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SW Florida / Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,773
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
I can't compare the two, but the Disco Potato is one of my favorite street turbos... I find Mitsus be less reliable.
#5
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
The 28RS will spool quicker but doesnt have quite the potential for power. The 2871R is definitely better than an Evo 3 turbo, it will spool quicker and make more power.
#6
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
I would think hes talking about the Evo 3 turbo, which is far more common. Building a manifold for the Evo 9 turbo wouldnt be worth the money.
The 28RS will spool quicker but doesnt have quite the potential for power. The 2871R is definitely better than an Evo 3 turbo, it will spool quicker and make more power.
The 28RS will spool quicker but doesnt have quite the potential for power. The 2871R is definitely better than an Evo 3 turbo, it will spool quicker and make more power.
Look back in the archives. Evo turbo will spool as fast and have the same fat powerband as the GT28rs, except it can push about 50-75 more whp.
#7
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
A Evo9 turbo is max $500. A custom manifold will cost $800. So we are at $1300. A GT28rs is $1100. A non-ebay manifold costs $300-900. Where is the extra money coming from?
Look back in the archives. Evo turbo will spool as fast and have the same fat powerband as the GT28rs, except it can push about 50-75 more whp.
Look back in the archives. Evo turbo will spool as fast and have the same fat powerband as the GT28rs, except it can push about 50-75 more whp.
Trending Topics
#8
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
I'll take OEM reliability over Garrett reliability any day of the week. Evo9 turbo is a better bang for the buck. I forgot to add in the $200 you save by not needing an external WG with the Evo9 turbo. There is not a chance I would spend $1200 on a GT28rs with the Evo9 turbo the performer it is for the price.
Also, the second you want more power, typically you need a new DP, manifold, intercooler, intercooler plumbing, ect ect ect. Evo9 turbo offers about 75whp more peak than the GT28rs. I say that's cheaper than anything else available.
Also, the second you want more power, typically you need a new DP, manifold, intercooler, intercooler plumbing, ect ect ect. Evo9 turbo offers about 75whp more peak than the GT28rs. I say that's cheaper than anything else available.
#9
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
I'll take OEM reliability over Garrett reliability any day of the week. Evo9 turbo is a better bang for the buck. I forgot to add in the $200 you save by not needing an external WG with the Evo9 turbo. There is not a chance I would spend $1200 on a GT28rs with the Evo9 turbo the performer it is for the price.
Also, the second you want more power, typically you need a new DP, manifold, intercooler, intercooler plumbing, ect ect ect. Evo9 turbo offers about 75whp more peak than the GT28rs. I say that's cheaper than anything else available.
Also, the second you want more power, typically you need a new DP, manifold, intercooler, intercooler plumbing, ect ect ect. Evo9 turbo offers about 75whp more peak than the GT28rs. I say that's cheaper than anything else available.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
i have a t3 .42ar/63ar and was told it would max out around 300.
http://www.go-autoworks-store.com/gat3su60.html
I have 250 @ ~14-15psi. The spool is quick (hard to stay out of it really).
I don't know if this helps you or not.
http://www.go-autoworks-store.com/gat3su60.html
I have 250 @ ~14-15psi. The spool is quick (hard to stay out of it really).
I don't know if this helps you or not.
#11
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, Tx, U.S.A
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
I made 350whp on a TD06 17c which is the same size wheel as a 16g with a different fin design. Granted the compressor housing is bigger than a td05 16g and exhaust housing is a 10cm2. The Big 16g evo turbo might be able to pull it off but it will be toward its limits. I believe the 17c and the evo 16g are rated at 400 cfm. It took me 23lbs to make the 350 on race gas.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: sunrise, FL, USA
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
the only reason i am thinking twice about the gt28rs is because it can not be rebuilt and the evo 16g can but i want a turbo that will spool just as fast if not faster than the gt28rs and get me to 350whp
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Stockton, California, USA
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: gt28rs (t3 .63) vs evo 16g ??
i had the gt28rs in my ls setup and I absolutely loved it. Quick response, had to drive like a grandma to keep it out of boost, and it has enough pep in it to get you the 350whp that your looking for with a properly built engine. Between the two i'd go hands down with the gt28rs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95LS1t
Forced Induction
11
07-12-2009 06:40 PM