Notices

Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2010, 01:18 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
HKSevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Hello, I am new and searched for results on this turbocharger but have found little to no information on other forums. I see here that Peak Boost had tested on their evo w/ relatively low boost (around 30psi) with dismal results but since the thread is from back in 05-06... i cannot view the dyno graph to see how bad it lagged. Anyone w/ any concrete data on this turbo w/ a 2.0l 4 cyl? This is basically a gt4294r in what seems to be an s-cover. My particular one we have at the shop has a q-trim i think in T4 .81 exh housing.

-Tom
Old 06-07-2010, 02:34 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
HKSevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

anybody? rumors? anything? LOL... jeesh...
Old 06-07-2010, 07:12 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
mikesrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Port Arthur, TX, USA
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

looks like you are going to have to test it out and let us know how it goes!

PS when do I get to see the beast run!
Old 06-07-2010, 09:20 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
 
TheShodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: City of Wind, IL, USA
Posts: 24,552
Received 234 Likes on 209 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

This turbocharger was an interesting combination but just wasn't usable. This is before the Borg-Warner and Precision units that are more readily available with big power in smaller packages due to better aerodynamic designs.
Old 06-08-2010, 08:26 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
HKSevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Originally Posted by TheShodan
This turbocharger was an interesting combination but just wasn't usable. This is before the Borg-Warner and Precision units that are more readily available with big power in smaller packages due to better aerodynamic designs.
could you define "unuseable"? What was typical spool (in lets say a 9:1 CR 2.0l motor or similar)? Surging / flow issues? What exactly was found to be negative? We're going to try it out since its on the Evo... but just wanted to see what info was out there before we start tuning it next week.

we were told it would spool quicker than a 4294r than in its original housing... but lose a tad of top end. This is in a T4 .81ar... So i was pegging it to act like a 67mm in a T3 .82? Just guessing as I am not the most knowledgeable w/ turbos. Im guessing from your response that perhaps the smaller housing may upset how it works?

-Tom
Old 06-08-2010, 01:38 PM
  #6  
OG Fabricator
 
Evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Stay far away unless you want an expensive paperweight.

It wasn't usable because it would break with in a few passes. Large compressor wheel, small turbine wheel, small shaft....say goodbye to the thrust bearing.
Old 06-08-2010, 01:46 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
HKSevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Originally Posted by Evo1
Stay far away unless you want an expensive paperweight.

It wasn't usable because it would break with in a few passes. Large compressor wheel, small turbine wheel, small shaft....say goodbye to the thrust bearing.
hmm, that i could understand. But the example we have is a large shaft and the turbine seems to be the appropriate wheel for a 4294r. I mean the entire chra looks to be from the 42r just the housings are smaller? Here's a pic of what fell into our laps...
Attached Images   
Old 06-08-2010, 03:58 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
SPOOLINmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: North Georgia/Atlanta
Posts: 7,913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

Never heard of anyone using it, i think a lot of people got over the big wheel in a small chassis thing real quick.
Old 06-10-2010, 09:36 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
HKSevo9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results

yeah, we've been using Forced Performance billet turbos over here... just this thing landed at our feet and it seemed interesting to try out. I also, cannot find any useable results from anyone. Well, i will be testing it next week... so I'll post results on a new thread bad or good, lol.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
riceball777
Forced Induction
8
06-22-2013 05:54 AM
v8eatrr
Forced Induction
13
11-26-2012 02:12 PM
VTC_CiViC
Forced Induction
23
03-21-2006 12:54 PM
allanonjj
Forced Induction
11
06-07-2005 05:11 PM
Pfieff
Forced Induction
61
07-29-2004 02:05 PM



Quick Reply: Garrett PHX42 turbocharger results



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 AM.