... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam...
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam... (1.8T_EG)
It really depends. If you are just sitting there looking forward, they are H beams. Once you swivel your head 90 degrees either direction, then they become I beams.
#4
Re: ... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam... (inspyral)
don't quote me on this, but I always thought it was because the top of crowers/hondas flared the top ring out to create a I-shape...and the eagles dont flare leaving the shaft of the rod straight and thus looking like an H...
#5
Re: ... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam... (Hatchblack)
It really depends. If you are just sitting there looking forward, they are H beams. Once you swivel your head 90 degrees either direction, then they become I beams.
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam... (1.8T_EG)
I think an H-beam design will have a slightly lower mass moment of inertia since the mass is concentrated nearer the centerline of the rod. THis would make it better for high RPM. However for rod buckling which I imagine is the failure mode for high-high cylinder pressures (like in FI) the material should be concentrated away from the buckling axis. Most likely bucking/bending would occur about an axis parallel to the crank since in the other direction the end conditions are "fixed" ( ie not allowed to rotate).
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: 90210, CA, usa
Posts: 2,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ... eagle rods... h-beam vs i-beam... (filetofit)
So basically H beam is good for your 10k rpm n/a motor, I beam is good for your 30psi terbod motor... unless I've got it wrong?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post