does it matter if i have a cable or hydraulic?
04-22-2005, 05:05 PM
#4
Trial User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (mildly.interesting)
I dont think there is an advantage to either. But I think with a cable tranny you "feel" the power more 
If you have a hydraulic then your fine, and there would be no need to switch to a cable. If you have cable your still fine, hydraulic might be a little easier and forgiving when engagin disengaging I suppose. But as far as power goes neither will give you more power than the other, unless your factoring in other components of the tranny
If you have a hydraulic then your fine, and there would be no need to switch to a cable. If you have cable your still fine, hydraulic might be a little easier and forgiving when engagin disengaging I suppose. But as far as power goes neither will give you more power than the other, unless your factoring in other components of the tranny
04-22-2005, 05:19 PM
#7
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Los AngeLes, Ca
Posts: 1,356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (NJIN BUILDR)
the b16a1 has a cable and is 700$ cheaper than that of the b16a2 with the hydraulic. if it's possible... i want to save that money to sleeve the block.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
crxguy05si
Tech / Misc
4
01-24-2003 07:40 PM
