Notices

disappointing dyno numbers =(

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-2003, 11:53 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
_Endless_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default disappointing dyno numbers =(



the car: 2000 SiR, Nissan T-28 turbo running at 7psi, vafc hack with 450cc dsm injectors, jacobs boost timing master. i was hoping to get at least 200hp.

the tuner said that's all my engine could produce since raising boost might do harm on the stock sleeves and suggested other means like adj. cam gears and port & polish.he also said that the nissan t-28 turbo i'm using is small for a b16. also, the weather might be a factor too coz it's warm here all year round and high humidity as well. gas quality is not good either.

baseline run was 158.7 then after tuning with the vafc and jacobs boost timing master it went up to 175.6hp. they told me my a/f now is at 12:1. the timing was retarded 1psi per pound of boost and that may have hurt power as well but they want it to be safe. so it's ok.

btw, why is the line very wiggly unlike some dyno sheet i've seen which is smoother than this?

any comments/suggestions are welcome.
Old 08-28-2003, 12:02 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
tegasaurus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Scottsdale, AZ, usa
Posts: 3,105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

that graph looks like what my old vafc hack would have dynoed. Looks liek your breaking up very hardcore in the upper rpm. Get a better fuel system and try her again.
Old 08-28-2003, 12:03 AM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
 
freakie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

looks like its running out of huff in the high end man
Old 08-28-2003, 02:35 AM
  #4  
DSF
Honda-Tech Member
 
DSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

I assume you mean that the ignition is retarded 1 degree per pound of boost. If so, that is ultra conservative. I believe Hondata's base maps are set at .75 degrees per pound and even they state that's conservative. I personally ran .25 degrees per pound and never heard detonation. There was an old post discussing ignition timing and the VAFC hack. I believe it stated that 4 degrees of initial base distributor retard with .25 degrees per pound on a BTM type device would mimic a conservative Hondata type ignition map.
Old 08-28-2003, 02:43 AM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Smashback's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Ft. Worth, TX
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

Yep, that's no good. A T28 should be able to keep up with a B16 just fine. Like he said, you're probably pulling too much timing. Port & polish is going to give squat for results, not a good bang for the buck on Honda motors. Then again, you should be able to go 9 or more PSI easily and get that 200 whp, but I think if you take step back, look at the entire setup, you should be able to get a whole lot more from it. Real engine management works wonders.
Old 08-28-2003, 05:45 AM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Blue-Civic-Hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Diego, CA.
Posts: 3,079
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

Wow..AutoPlus in the Philippines...I wish I could have went there when I visited last year....As for your dyno sheet, do you happen to know what kind of dyno they use? is it a Mustang dyno, dynoJet ? have you upgraded your fuel pump at all? Looks like your pump is not pumping enough fuel...I hate to say this, but my former all motor b18C1 was dyno'ed at 165WHP and 130ft/lbs with I/H/E and stock internals.
Old 08-28-2003, 06:04 AM
  #7  
Member
 
civictypenos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: poop, fl, us
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (Blue-Civic-Hybrid)

my b16 dynoed at 154 w/ no turbo,i think you need to retard your timing only .33 or so per pound.you could even bring the a/f up a tad to around 12.5.
Old 08-28-2003, 06:14 AM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
 
VTC_CiViC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Naples, Fl, USA
Posts: 8,613
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (civictypenos)

I wouldn't touch that A/F, 12.1 is already lean enough, look at your timing. I've always heard .5 degree per psi is a good rule of thumb, so that might help you produce a little more on the top side.
Old 08-28-2003, 10:46 AM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
 
SiRkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canada City
Posts: 5,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (VTC_CiViC)

and get hondata or something!
Old 08-28-2003, 01:29 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
shermanyang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: St.Paul, MN
Posts: 3,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (SiRkid)

how many psi's are you running? when i ran the hack i ran my stock 94 si fuel pump with dsm 450 injectors and at 9-9.5 psi i was making 210whp and 193wtq. i think something's wrong with your tuning. i made this with 92 octane gas and 2 1/4" exhaust. and your sleeves should be good up to 10 psi tuned.
Old 08-28-2003, 01:46 PM
  #11  
 
Bad-T's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Showdown State
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

Get rid of that weak *** T-28!!!
Old 08-28-2003, 02:02 PM
  #12  
Member
 
hulkhb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: 253, usa
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (freakie)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by freakie &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">looks like its running out of huff in the high end man</TD></TR></TABLE>

yup thats cause T28 =
Old 08-28-2003, 02:06 PM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Cyphear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: KC, KS
Posts: 1,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also, P&P the head will be just as hard on the sleeves as upping the boost. Both will just let more air into the cylinder.
Old 08-28-2003, 02:59 PM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Charlie Moua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

I know for a FACT that a T28 is not too small for that stock B16. If your had head work, higher compression(or boosting past 16psi on low 9.1 compression) and had a redline of over 8500 then yes that turbo will fall out of its efficency range.

get hondata bro... difference is night and day. your power~band will not look so rough. Because you are in a area that has tons of humidity that may be the problem as well. How much octane do you get there? is the gas quality cheap and cruddy?

If you have a healthy motor and boosting at 7psi with good fuel system and a FMIC and a real fuel management system you should see about +210whp and like 160ish tq.

hth
Old 08-28-2003, 05:48 PM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
eg6turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SF
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (Charlie Moua)

for one thing im not sure if autoplus knows what kinda of tuning an afc hack might need...pulling 1º of timing per pound is quite much...and at28 should have enough air to pull ur power to redline....kepp the timing down too like .25 like whats his face sed and werk ur way up slowly...if u start running rough back down a little...
i made 173whp at 7 psi on my d series and 149 tq....i bet timing is really an issue...if u have a a/f chart that would be nice...

from the chart power look good until boost kicks in...and starts running rough right from when the timing master is werking...

o by the way i kno philip the owner if autoplus in san francisco...super nice guy!
Old 08-28-2003, 07:00 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
 
_Endless_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (Blue-Civic-Hybrid)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Blue-Civic-Hybrid &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow..AutoPlus in the Philippines...I wish I could have went there when I visited last year....As for your dyno sheet, do you happen to know what kind of dyno they use? is it a Mustang dyno, dynoJet ? have you upgraded your fuel pump at all? Looks like your pump is not pumping enough fuel...I hate to say this, but my former all motor b18C1 was dyno'ed at 165WHP and 130ft/lbs with I/H/E and stock internals.</TD></TR></TABLE>

they're using dynojet.

shermanyang,
i'm running 7psi.


i also think my timing affected the dyno result. autoplus are known to tune conservatively taking into consideration the weather and fuel type. if i only had a standalone fuel management they would have tune it more aggressively.

the highest fuel octane rating we have is 96 BUT it's not really that high, it's just a marketing ploy and it sucks. so i wouldn't be surprised if the 96 octane here is only equivalent to a 91 or 92 in the US.

together with the fuel, the weather plays a role too coz a stock SiR only dyno at 120-130hp unlike in the US it's 139-140hp stock(correct me if i'm wrong) as i saw on various magazines and the net.

thanks for all you comments.
Old 08-29-2003, 05:51 AM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Charlie Moua's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (_Endless_)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by _Endless_ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

the highest fuel octane rating we have is 96 BUT it's not really that high, it's just a marketing ploy and it sucks. so i wouldn't be surprised if the 96 octane here is only equivalent to a 91 or 92 in the US.

together with the fuel, the weather plays a role too coz a stock SiR only dyno at 120-130hp unlike in the US it's 139-140hp stock(correct me if i'm wrong) as i saw on various magazines and the net.

thanks for all you comments. </TD></TR></TABLE>

damn that suck then if your only really getting about 91-92oct.... i've talked with Turbopanda and he says in Thailand..... (not that far away...LOL) they get like 102octane at the pump... which is great gas.

WTF? why would your B16 only dyno at 120-130? thats like what stock LS dyno at. Could it be the humidity?
Old 08-29-2003, 08:26 AM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Infinity_Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Around, VA, USA
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (Charlie Moua)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Charlie Moua &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WTF? why would your B16 only dyno at 120-130? thats like what stock LS dyno at. Could it be the humidity?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah its hot as hell in the Philippines....
Old 08-29-2003, 10:15 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
 
turb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: la la, land
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (Infinity_Racer)

so is 1 degree retard per pound of boost seem reasonable considering the hot and humid weather and bad quality gas?
Old 08-29-2003, 10:42 PM
  #20  
Member
 
Cyber ITR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Baghdad
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: disappointing dyno numbers =( (turb)

im only getting 148wkw with b18c , t28 turbo as well

@ 6psi
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kid-jdm-teggy
Engine Management and Tuning
14
09-03-2015 08:18 PM
all_out_jdm
Forced Induction
3
05-21-2005 04:23 AM
CRXdan
Forced Induction
4
12-20-2004 10:23 AM
speedworks
Forced Induction
5
03-29-2003 03:23 AM
echo999
Forced Induction
4
12-31-2002 11:28 AM



Quick Reply: disappointing dyno numbers =(



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:09 AM.