D16 Turbo Choices input needed, 275-300 HP Goal
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
D16 Turbo Choices input needed, 275-300 HP Goal
Hello
I am at the point where I need to start looking for a turbo for a d16z6 setup. With a hp goal of 250-300 HP. Now the obvious choices out there are a T3 Super 60 and a t3t4 50 trim (sc50). From the research i've done a T3 Super 60 is the perfect choice for the d16, but might not meet my power goals. The SC50 on the other hand will be more than a enough, but might be more lag then I would prefer.
I was looking at innovative's site and I noticed they make 40(SH40) and 46(SH46) trim turbos. Which might be able to offer a compromise between the T3 super 60 & a t3t4 50trim?
From what i've read innovative is a great company and I always hear alot about their SC61 killer. Just wondering if anyone has any input on these turbos, and if they would be a better choice then the other turbos mentioned?
Thanks in adanvce
SH40
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi...03119
SH46
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi...03119
I am at the point where I need to start looking for a turbo for a d16z6 setup. With a hp goal of 250-300 HP. Now the obvious choices out there are a T3 Super 60 and a t3t4 50 trim (sc50). From the research i've done a T3 Super 60 is the perfect choice for the d16, but might not meet my power goals. The SC50 on the other hand will be more than a enough, but might be more lag then I would prefer.
I was looking at innovative's site and I noticed they make 40(SH40) and 46(SH46) trim turbos. Which might be able to offer a compromise between the T3 super 60 & a t3t4 50trim?
From what i've read innovative is a great company and I always hear alot about their SC61 killer. Just wondering if anyone has any input on these turbos, and if they would be a better choice then the other turbos mentioned?
Thanks in adanvce
SH40
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi...03119
SH46
http://innovativeturbo.com/cgi...03119
#5
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Youngstown, OH
Posts: 1,992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (yellowturbo)
i got a built d16z6 with a t3/t04e 60 trim w/ .48 ar on hot side.
I get 12 lbs by 4-4.5k with a mbc hooked up. 20lbs by 5k if that. looks too big for the engine, but if freaking rocks. hits like a ton of bricks
I get 12 lbs by 4-4.5k with a mbc hooked up. 20lbs by 5k if that. looks too big for the engine, but if freaking rocks. hits like a ton of bricks
#6
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MN
Posts: 12,561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Pfieffdog)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pfieffdog »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">gt28r or the rs, awesome spool and with make nice power</TD></TR></TABLE>
that or else just get the t28 .86ar
that or else just get the t28 .86ar
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (yellowturbo)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yellowturbo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I like my SC50 .63ar but if you prefer a turbo with less lag go with the .48ar</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree with yellowturbo. The SC50 is perfect for your goal and should still have a little room to grow.
I agree with yellowturbo. The SC50 is perfect for your goal and should still have a little room to grow.
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (RyanCivic2000)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanCivic2000 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I agree with yellowturbo. The SC50 is perfect for your goal and should still have a little room to grow.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What is spool up like with the SC50?
I agree with yellowturbo. The SC50 is perfect for your goal and should still have a little room to grow.</TD></TR></TABLE>
What is spool up like with the SC50?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IntegraGSR(-1)
Forced Induction
4
08-10-2005 05:30 PM