Notices

CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2016, 04:48 PM
  #26  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
king06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by Geis
Furthermore, it's frustrating because there's another thread with a guy claiming his friend ran 470whp on a 57 trim on 91 octane, with a 300hp intercooler to boot. I see ridiculous claims like this from time to time but nobody else seems to really think twice about it, and I have heard of/seen turbos somehow flow a bit higher than what the maps show so I dunno.
Originally Posted by DC4KiD
I was posting in that thread as well. It's really hard to believe that a T3/T04E 57 trim turbo can put out 470whp on 17 psi and 91 octane. 470whp is well beyond what that turbo should make, but then again, I could be wrong - that, or his buddy has no idea what turbo he actually has. Those numbers match up to what a T3/60-1 turbo would produce.
Lol that's me. Ill see if I can get a pic of the dyno graph.
We know exactly what turbo it was, it was bought as a kit from peakboost right before he whent MIA. Not trying to start anything, just saying its been done.



Originally Posted by Geis
Where???

Were both in phoenix AZ. Locash tuned.
Old 01-29-2016, 05:01 PM
  #27  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
AZ_CIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,497
Received 365 Likes on 271 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by Geis
Where???
Turbos Direct but were talking 2008
Old 01-29-2016, 05:04 PM
  #28  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
AZ_CIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,497
Received 365 Likes on 271 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by king06
Lol that's me. Ill see if I can get a pic of the dyno graph.
We know exactly what turbo it was, it was bought as a kit from peakboost right before he whent MIA. Not trying to start anything, just saying its been done.






Were both in phoenix AZ. Locash tuned.
I think maybe he meant price on the turbo?
Old 01-29-2016, 05:45 PM
  #29  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
king06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 807
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Oh. I missed that. $600 is an OLD price lol.
Old 01-29-2016, 06:18 PM
  #30  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
 
DC4KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 21,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by Geis
Where???
Keyword: were. Lol. They've gone up in the last few years, averaging about $730 + shipping.
Old 01-29-2016, 06:19 PM
  #31  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (4)
 
DC4KiD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 21,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by king06
Lol that's me. Ill see if I can get a pic of the dyno graph.
We know exactly what turbo it was, it was bought as a kit from peakboost right before he whent MIA. Not trying to start anything, just saying its been done.






Were both in phoenix AZ. Locash tuned.
Like I said, I could be wrong, haha. Must be one heck of an efficient setup
Old 01-29-2016, 06:24 PM
  #32  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by DC4KiD
Keyword: were. Lol. They've gone up in the last few years, averaging about $730 + shipping.
Yeah hence why I was asking...man those turbos are such rip offs nowadays, I mean I know they work well and are solid proven units but for not much more you can have something a lot, lot better.
Old 01-29-2016, 06:33 PM
  #33  
Honda-Tech Member
 
LightningTeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 5,216
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

What is that exactly?
Old 01-29-2016, 06:53 PM
  #34  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Well I'm assuming a Hunter, gt28 journal bearing, gt3255, predator and surfer all start from 820-(950?) and those basically cover everything from a t3 super 60 to a 60-1 and all the t3/t4s.

So for 1-200 dollars more you can have much more modern technology wheels and designs, albeit they are still journals.

STC man...you should know :p
Old 01-29-2016, 06:54 PM
  #35  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

I'm not sure about Comp but I thought I saw some billet turbos from them for pretty decent prices as well, borgwarners are a bit too pricey for me to really consider though since you can get ball bearing for around the same price, unless you are planning to spend 1500+ then the EFRs may be worth it.
Old 01-29-2016, 08:08 PM
  #36  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by DC4KiD
Like I said, I could be wrong, haha. Must be one heck of an efficient setup
Nah, you're not



I fully admit that I was wrong about the flow rate; I got it mixed up with the 50 trim, but it's funny because the 57 trim flows even less, 45lbs/min about

It is not possible to push the 53+lbs out of it in order to get 470 whp, not to mention its pretty hard to max it out as is with high IATS, no way it can even get maxxed without knock resistant fuel and an efficient intercooler.
Old 01-30-2016, 10:11 AM
  #37  
rookn00b
iTrader: (2)
 
xtrac1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 5,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by AZ_CIVIC
I've done 480whp on a 57 trim with E85 at about 18psi. I actually liked my Garrett Journal 57, thing was fun. Plus they were like 600 brand new.
Attachment 516060
Old 01-30-2016, 12:10 PM
  #38  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ls joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: toledo
Posts: 1,910
Received 94 Likes on 84 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by xtrac1
whats up. what you doin in my neck of the woods.

investigating turbobanned
Old 01-30-2016, 12:12 PM
  #39  
Honda-Tech Member
 
PyroProblem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,167
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Perhaps the dyno reads higher?
(I try to not get caught up in the actual numbers themselves, as theyre used as a tuning tool, not a measuring standard to another dyno in another location with different conditions)
Old 01-30-2016, 12:28 PM
  #40  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ls joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: toledo
Posts: 1,910
Received 94 Likes on 84 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

on my stock b16a engine, b16 cams, afi 18x 6.5x 3.5 garrett core fmic.

at 364whp on a mustang dyno my iats were bout high 160s, and the power was gaining with added pleasure
Old 01-30-2016, 12:45 PM
  #41  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by ls joker
on my stock b16a engine, b16 cams, afi 18x 6.5x 3.5 garrett core fmic.

at 364whp on a mustang dyno my iats were bout high 160s, and the power was gaining with added pleasure
Still nowhere near 470whp on any dyno
no dyno will read that much higher than whats possible, unless it was literally made to bullshit numbers to the max...which i've never seen
Old 01-30-2016, 12:50 PM
  #42  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ls joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: toledo
Posts: 1,910
Received 94 Likes on 84 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

ive heard of some high dynopacks. but, nearly fifty whp off
Old 01-30-2016, 12:58 PM
  #43  
Honda-Tech Member
 
PyroProblem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,167
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Wont a dyna pak always read higher (than say a dynojet) since the wheel and tire combo is removed during the pull?
I figure a wheel and tire combo has to be worth about 50 lbs that the engine doesn't have to turn.
Old 01-30-2016, 01:57 PM
  #44  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ls joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: toledo
Posts: 1,910
Received 94 Likes on 84 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

sounds viable. but, its only tool. i personally like jumpin on other dynos just for comparisons
Old 01-30-2016, 01:58 PM
  #45  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Yeah but even 420whp on 91 octane with a '300hp tiny intercooler' on a 57 trim?
Come one guys, I can't be the only one who's thinking 'bullshit'
Old 01-31-2016, 04:31 AM
  #46  
Honda-Tech Member
 
blackeg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: schooling kids in ny, usa
Posts: 9,813
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by Geis
Yeah but even 420whp on 91 octane with a '300hp tiny intercooler' on a 57 trim?
Come one guys, I can't be the only one who's thinking 'bullshit'
i made 415 on jeff evans dynapack in '08 i think it was. right about 18-20 psi iirc on the 57 trim 93 octane. 84mmlsvtec. not that it was optimal at all, but it happened
Old 01-31-2016, 05:07 AM
  #47  
Honda-Tech Member
 
ls joker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: toledo
Posts: 1,910
Received 94 Likes on 84 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by blackeg
i made 415 on jeff evans dynapack in '08 i think it was. right about 18-20 psi iirc on the 57 trim 93 octane. 84mmlsvtec. not that it was optimal at all, but it happened
yea its doable. did you have gsr or type r cams when you made the 415whp pull
Old 01-31-2016, 07:55 AM
  #48  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

Originally Posted by blackeg
i made 415 on jeff evans dynapack in '08 i think it was. right about 18-20 psi iirc on the 57 trim 93 octane. 84mmlsvtec. not that it was optimal at all, but it happened
I feel like I would start being a broken record if I responded with...oh f*ck it
Old 01-31-2016, 02:30 PM
  #49  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
AZ_CIVIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,497
Received 365 Likes on 271 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

People can believe what they want. I also pulled a nice 960whp out of my 62mm Garrett Journal bearing unit as well. Pulled over 900 out of my Comp 62mm that Joe just used to run a 9.0 and set a record for the fastest FIS Honda in the country.

I really don't care about dyno numbers though it's what it does at the track. I've pulled turbos on and off my car at least 25 times in the past couple months working with both Turbo's Direct and Comp. You wouldn't believe what kind of losses and pickups you can get by Testing, Testing, Testing.

Fact of the matter is, along time ago when I did run the 57 trim it made good power on E85.
84.5 mm Darton Sleeved Block
10:1 compression pistons
Eagle Rods

Joe Alaniz Race head
Type R cams
Edelbrock Manifold

Simple but effective, plus all those little flow graphs people always present really don't mean jack in the real world on real cars. Let's say we push our cars and turbos to the max. We don't play safe, I have busted multiple compressor wheels on the dyno and track in the past couple months alone pushing the turbo harder than any simulations or in house testing does. This helps both the company and us testers figure out what works.

But hey what do I know, someone has flow graphs LOL.
Old 01-31-2016, 03:35 PM
  #50  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Geis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 919
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default re: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**

It's not even that man, it would be like me coming in here saying I pushed by gt28rs to 400whp....it just isn't going to happen on any engine


Quick Reply: CSS b18c, keep or ditch the ancient 57 trim? **Updated 10/19/17, Page 3**



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.