Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
I would like to get an idea what Honda engines (with VTEC) like as it relates to camshaft specs. i.e., "turbo applications like more (exhaust) lift and duration, superchargers like more X"
Thanks.
Thanks.
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chicagoland, illinois, US
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
There is far too many other variable including compression ratio, displacement, cylinder head flow, back pressure, boost pressure and many other things to generalize it to merely the method of induction. But I'm sure others with more knowledge will chime in.
#3
R.I.P. Mark
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
SuperCharger is an easy one
best combo cams and a proven history of results
gsr intake + Itr / ctr exhaust with reduced duration on both
best combo cams and a proven history of results
gsr intake + Itr / ctr exhaust with reduced duration on both
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Re: Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
#5
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Camshaft specs: NA vs. SC vs. Turbo
Good luck. Very few people on here actually know the specs of the cams that are in their cars.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post