TurboB18C1

This is what i made at 20psi on the SC61
this was a conservitive tune AFR was kept to a 12.1 and the car ran on MotorSport 109- we did not tune the cam gears at all on this set up, i was having some crankcase vent. problems when i was at the dyno and later realized my catch can was setup wrong... oh well next time i am hoping to reach 400hp

Rod.

good job

EM1 MIKE

The date says 06-08-2004 and you just came back from the dyno?

(Good dyno #'s btw, )

TurboB18C1

Well on my invoice it says 08-06-2004 well that was early this month ... just been tied up with school and now i had the chance to post it...

bomber

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EM1 MIKE &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The date says 06-08-2004 and you just came back from the dyno?

(Good dyno #'s btw, )</TD></TR></TABLE>

Its probably using that Euro style dating.

95GSRTT

really you only made 321 whp on an sc61 at 20 psi? Whats wrong? Most ppl make that on a gsr with a much smaller turbo.

*Boostwerks*

What was your timing @ 20psi?

How big is the bore?

and what turbine housing, and wheel are you using?

Thanks,
Bryson

Teg4e

Isn't 320whp really low for your setup?

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Teg4e &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Isn't 320whp really low for your setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>

I tend to agree, especially with the higher compression and amount of boost being used with that application.. We've had easily 30 more wheel hp at only 12 psi.

Something for some reason doesn't seem right.

enginetiks

I'm gonna jump in and defend this guy.......I've had many cars on the same dyno he used. To put it simply, the dyno at vishnu reads quite a bit lower than any other dyno I've ever seen. If it had been a dynojet the numbers would have been alot closer to 360-375. I don't want to start the whole which dyno is more correct debate, but their dyno has always read about 15-19% lower than any other dynos in the area.

TheShodan

iTrader: (14)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by enginetiks &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm gonna jump in and defend this guy.......I've had many cars on the same dyno he used. To put it simply, the dyno at vishnu reads quite a bit lower than any other dyno I've ever seen. If it had been a dynojet the numbers would have been alot closer to 360-375. I don't want to start the whole which dyno is more correct debate, but their dyno has always read about 15-19% lower than any other dynos in the area. </TD></TR></TABLE>

That's very true, but even so, at 20PSI? There is definately something inefficient about that setup.

*Boostwerks*

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheShodan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

That's very true, but even so, at 20PSI? There is definately something inefficient about that setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>

To which is why I asked what I did...

enginetiks

I was never saying that the car wqas making the power it should be. I just wanted to state a few facts about the dyno that was used. I'm just wondering why the graph stops at @7500 rpm?

TurboB18C1

running bewteen 20-22 degree timing


This dyno run was not attended for max power because we ran into some problems, the engine misfired when more timing was givin and durring another power run a big puff of smoke came out of the motor... the dipstick flewout of the motor becuase the catch can setup was wrong... the crank was getting pressurized at high rpm.... another problem was my tire was getting flat on the dyno ...

After a long day... plus he was having some trouble of his own some thing about the car red lining at 8800 and his dyno did not show that instead it was reading something else .... ???? i dont know what was going on.. ?

Turbo: specs .70/.68 SC61 T04S-E cover
Engine bore. stock 1.8L b18c1
Wheel? well i dont know exactly what wheel i am using on the compressor: its and SC61 (GT Wheel?)

TurboTegB18c

If the engine stopped at 7300 rpm, u could easily get another 20-30whp at 8k or so.

TurboB18C1

the engine was stoping at 8750 but the graph showed something else ?? something with the gearing interpoluation (sp) of the dyno...

done

How was his catch can setup??

Mase

of the dyno dynamic dynos ive used, they read around 5% lower, 10% max. they are pretty sweet.

anyways, i dunno what kind of race gas you used, but i noticed you said the car misfired when u advanced the timing, probably detonation, did you try backing off the timing?

w/ only that kind of power, u could have used a lower octane, ie. 96-100 or so, even 93, but cali only has 91.

TurboB18C1

Well when i was dynoing the car it was connected from the brass nipple on the turbo to can and then from the can to the pvc outlet.. behind the block..

TurboB18C1

the car stoped missing when the gap on the plugs was closed to a .024 thousands (bkr7e-11) well he told me to come in with a higher octane gas so i decided to chose VP motor sport 109...

stick

plus vishnu's dyno is notorious for reading low.
stock STi dyno 210-220 hp and on others dyno 250-260hp ie mustang dyno
stock WRX dyno 150ish or so on his dyno.

TurboB18C1

Blown90hatcH

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboB18C1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the dipstick flewout of the motor </TD></TR></TABLE>
Awesome. Anyone get that on video?

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TurboB18C1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the car stoped missing when the gap on the plugs was closed to a .024 thousands (bkr7e-11) </TD></TR></TABLE>
I would try some 8 heat range plugs.

buda18

i personally wouldn't be happy with the numbers.

i made 300 at 8 psi

TurboB18C1

Was that on the the same dyno...