Notices

B16A2 IM vs. ITR IM?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-2004, 09:45 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
VinceVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default B16A2 IM vs. ITR IM?

Would there be significant gains from swapping out the b16a2 intake manifold for a ITR intake manifold? This is for boosting at a moderate level of 8-10psi, and stock motor. Also, are there any differences between the ITR IM and Skunk2 IM? I know that the skunk2 has a model for gsrs that just bolt on, but is there a difference in their designs? or is it a straight copy.....

Thanks in advance!
Old 02-14-2004, 07:05 AM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Naterror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: B16A2 IM vs. ITR IM? (VinceVTEC)

the skunk2 manifold is based on the ITR, so I don't see any difference in performance. yes, its a difference over the stock b16. more mid and top end than the B16, but if your going boost I would go with the jg manifold.
Old 02-14-2004, 08:22 AM
  #3  
Member
 
99B16Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa, Fl, US
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i dyno tested the b16 vs skunk2 and gained 13whp a 2wtq at about 12-13psi. all the gains were above 6500rpm
Old 02-14-2004, 05:49 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
 
VinceVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (99B16Si)

Cool. I don't think my setup needs the JG, since i'm only running a Greddy kit. Just wondering if i should replace the manifold while i swap my headgasket. Anymore opinions?
Old 02-14-2004, 10:27 PM
  #5  
Member
 
99B16Si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa, Fl, US
Posts: 1,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

skunk2 all the way
Old 02-14-2004, 10:40 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
-iLLuZioN-B18C1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (99B16Si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99B16Si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">skunk2 all the way</TD></TR></TABLE>

ill 2nd the skunk2. its what im running
the jg is something i would get if i only ran my car
at the track. not sure how it is on the b16's, but on
gsr's, there is alot more midrange power from skunk2
compared to jg's manifold.
Old 02-15-2004, 12:30 AM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Naterror's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (VinceVTEC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VinceVTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Cool. I don't think my setup needs the JG, since i'm only running a Greddy kit. Just wondering if i should replace the manifold while i swap my headgasket. Anymore opinions?</TD></TR></TABLE>thats cool then, I didn't know what size turbo you were going to run. but yes the skunk will be better and since your replacing the manifold I would use a hondata manifold gasket as well.
Old 02-15-2004, 12:59 AM
  #8  
Member
 
SiBirdie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Grabiel Valley, South Cali, USA
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (Naterror)

I got the AEBS intake manifold for the b16. I heard it make more power then a skunk 2 one. I forgot, i saw it on the dyno somewhere.
Old 02-15-2004, 07:42 AM
  #9  
Thread Starter
 
VinceVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (SiBirdie)

You guys are all saying Skunk2. But did Skunk2 modify the ITR in anyway to make it flow better or something? or is it a straight copy?
Old 02-16-2004, 08:21 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
 
VinceVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (VinceVTEC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VinceVTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You guys are all saying Skunk2. But did Skunk2 modify the ITR in anyway to make it flow better or something? or is it a straight copy?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Anyone?
Old 02-16-2004, 08:28 PM
  #11  
TurboJesse
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: (VinceVTEC)

just turn the boost up and get the power that way, its cheaper
Old 02-16-2004, 08:29 PM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
-iLLuZioN-B18C1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,395
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (VinceVTEC)

here ya go

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=489676
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=101456
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=99406

read in there and youll find your answre.
Old 02-17-2004, 05:45 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
 
VinceVTEC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: (-iLLuZioN-B18C1)

Thanks
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LoooseGSR
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
4
06-27-2007 06:15 PM
Twin-cam
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
7
08-05-2004 08:31 AM
GReddySetGO
Tech / Misc
3
11-17-2001 09:58 AM
Xerxes
Forced Induction
7
11-10-2001 04:10 PM



Quick Reply: B16A2 IM vs. ITR IM?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:11 AM.