0VtecKiDD

Here is the long awaited dyno of our top mount turbo manifold.
Motor specs:
84mm Golden Eagle Sleeves
JE 9.5:1 Pistons
Eagle Rods
JG Edelbrock manifold
1000cc injectors
Walbro 255
B16 CAMS
STOCK HEAD
Rocket Motorsports Gen1 Turbo Valvesprings and Retainers
MSPi/Turbo Dave Custom Top Mount Turbo Manifold
T3/T67 .83 A/R
Tial 38mm Wastegate
HKS SSQ BOV
Uberdata

Pics of the car:





Pics of the manifold:





PUMP GAS 93 OCTANE 20PSI:


RACE GAS 29PSI SAE:



STD numbers


Im thinking with ITR cams and a ported head he'll make 650-675whp. he also needs another Walbro pump, Fuel PSI was starting to not hold.

Thanks to ScttyDB411 for the Ubderdata Tuning

non-VTEC

nice numbers on uberdata!!

but i think i would like to see it a little richer than 12:1 on the dyno with that much boost and that much power......

anyone else agree?

AbitAvenger

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by non-VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">nice numbers on uberdata!!

but i think i would like to see it a little richer than 12:1 on the dyno with that much boost and that much power......

anyone else agree?</TD></TR></TABLE>Agreed. We'll see how it does in the long run.
Great uberdata numbers

Turbo-charged

fuel pump problems as he mentioned above. all the money that goes into these set ups i cant beleive people try to push the limits of the walbro pump..makes me cringe.

i lost a motor to a walbro pump, so im a little afraid of them now

similar set up to what i had with a larger turbo, should go down the track fast

anothaRRR

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Turbo-charged &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">fuel pump problems as he mentioned above. all the money that goes into these set ups i cant beleive people try to push the limits of the walbro pump..makes me cringe.

i lost a motor to a walbro pump, so im a little afraid of them now

similar set up to what i had with a larger turbo, should go down the track fast </TD></TR></TABLE>
True, thats the main reason I took the walbro off my car. Powerband doesnt look all that great though, only 1500rpm of useable power....Yall should try a smaller a/r that it had and powerband should be better...Seems a little laggy with that housing...

Turbocivic94

sick numbers on uberdata

therealPROJEKTEG

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by non-VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i think i would like to see it a little richer than 12:1</TD></TR></TABLE>

boosted92

What's up with this setup? My Brother's 81.5mm B16A motor spools up his T3/T67 HO quicker than this does. Check for a boost leak or something, because that turbo is spooling about 1500 RPM's slower than it should be.

TurboTegB18c

Nice PEAK numbers, but sorry to say that the powerband isn't much. Also, i read on the other thread that your running 28 degrees of timing? If so, that is ALOT.
Anyhow, nice numbers and good luck with the car. Paul

jayman322

good job, least someones cars getting work done

Muckman

iTrader: (2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boosted92 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What's up with this setup? My Brother's 81.5mm B16A motor spools up his T3/T67 HO quicker than this does. Check for a boost leak or something, because that turbo is spooling about 1500 RPM's slower than it should be.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Wow 1,500rpm? Can you post his dyno?

Fitti

nice looking manifold

cuin9sec

nice setup...not all that bad really. 200whp by 5500rpm...lol.

buy some bigger cams and rev that ****** on out some more...after you have swapped out fuel pumps of course.

EnzoSpeed

Two in the pink, one in the stink

silviadriftr

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Muckman &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow 1,500rpm? Can you post his dyno?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Agreed. I would like to see this as well.

SPOOLINmatt

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by silviadriftr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Agreed. I would like to see this as well. </TD></TR></TABLE>

YEAH NO **** LOL. SHOW US!!!

IM SORRY BUT THIS WHOLE 1500 RPM of usable power and spool time and blah blah is the biggest crap ever. this is one gear going from 2000rpm up. Do some people not realize that after first gear this graph means nothing, the power band COMPLETLY goes psyco? I drove it tonight and since its my car, ill tell you that it has a power band and its nothing like whats drawn out by this single gear dyno pull, LOL. Its a little laggy BIG DEAL, ive seen a lot worse.

and for the guy that said 28 degrees is a lot, i dont know how many high WHP cars youve delt with in tuning, but thats just the tip of the iceberg. haha. See you guys at the ****** track.

silviadriftr

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by anothaRRR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">True, thats the main reason I took the walbro off my car. Powerband doesnt look all that great though, only 1500rpm of useable power....Yall should try a smaller a/r that it had and powerband should be better...Seems a little laggy with that housing...</TD></TR></TABLE>

He already knows about the walboro and is planning to upgrade soon from what he said.
As for the "1500 rpms of usable power" I was thinking of your old dyno graph at 32psi and it looks really similar I think but I could be wrong. Here it is:




Not trying to start anything just wondering how you can be so negative when he did this whp with stock(non ported) head, stock b16 cams and stock valves at 3 psi less than yours? Just looking for some clarification

boosted k20

u sure it was 28* total timing? what cwas the timing at peak torque?

Suprdave

I bet the ECU and Distributor are not synced correctly. 28deg isn't a good idea for longevity...

josh green

you guys are talking about a RACE tune here, its not something that will be driven on or beaten on everyday, so you can run more timing. The same thing was said about his unsleeved block about it not being linear and the graph may have looked it, the powerband was very smooth.
The a/f ratio... we have 93 at EVERY pump and the temperature does not fluctuate that much. We will get some minor mods done, retune and then work on those 60 footers.

2point2

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by VtecKiDD &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Uberdata
</TD></TR></TABLE>

KeyserSoze

Nice setup, more fuel is mosdef needed but you already know that. And those are nice #'s for any ems.

GJ guys.

anothaRRR

Yeah, mine was done with a t4, and I knew right away that my numbers sucked cause of the powerband, I was somewhat dissapointed with how it went down...To those who think that powerband doesnt mean anything...I went faster when I had 561whp than when I had 641whp cause of the laggy turbo...Everytime you shift you gotta let the turbo spool so dont say that it doesnt matter cause its one gear only...Trust me I know, I learned it the hard way by chosing a turbo that was not the right size....All im saying is that I think you will see better results with a smaller a/r housing....If in fact this is a race setup than peak numbers dont mean ****, its the powerband that matters and how long of it do you have, when it reaches full boost....I dont think I was being negative just trying to give a advice, the highest my boost got to 32psi fluctuating up and down, wastegate wouldnt hold had a small spring in it....

93H22ACX

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by silviadriftr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

He already knows about the walboro and is planning to upgrade soon from what he said.
As for the "1500 rpms of usable power" I was thinking of your old dyno graph at 32psi and it looks really similar I think but I could be wrong. Here it is:

Not trying to start anything just wondering how you can be so negative when he did this whp with stock(non ported) head, stock b16 cams and stock valves at 3 psi less than yours? Just looking for some clarification </TD></TR></TABLE>

he swapped out turbing housing immediately after the dyno LOL....

the t3/67 is laggy on that dyno... ours hit full boost about 6300rpm or so on 82a/r also..

JDM_EM1

nice, bump for ga