300whp acura 1.6EL D series Build up has begun
02-23-2004, 04:59 AM
#1
300whp acura 1.6EL D series Build up has begun
Started taking out the motor this weekend taking my time. Took some pic's of the motor before taking parts off of it. My goal is 300whp and from there on.
Sorry for the crappy pics not much room in the garage to tak pics. Let me know what u guys think
Modified by JDMCRX at 2:33 PM 6/25/2004
Sorry for the crappy pics not much room in the garage to tak pics. Let me know what u guys think
Modified by JDMCRX at 2:33 PM 6/25/2004
02-23-2004, 09:20 AM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ELSpool)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ELSpool »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good stuff Josh!
Big love for the EL!
RyanCivic2000, I'm using the SC-50, so is Yellowturbo and JDMCRX is using a 50 trim as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am also using the SC50 with .48 A/R!
Big love for the EL!
RyanCivic2000, I'm using the SC-50, so is Yellowturbo and JDMCRX is using a 50 trim as well.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I am also using the SC50 with .48 A/R!
Trending Topics
02-23-2004, 09:29 AM
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ELSpool)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ELSpool »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Nice, I went with ther .63 ar, I didn't know precision made a 4bolt option, they flow better than the 5 bolt, or at least thats I was told.</TD></TR></TABLE>
It was custom ordered with the 4-bolt pattern. It makes for a more efficient hot side. Just curious what made you decide to go with the .63? Are you raising redline at all?
It was custom ordered with the 4-bolt pattern. It makes for a more efficient hot side. Just curious what made you decide to go with the .63? Are you raising redline at all?
ah well if i can not make good power with it ill change it to a BB maybe depends on the bank
02-23-2004, 12:35 PM
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ELSpool)
The .48 SC50 should be good to around 400whp at 30-32 psi on a 1.6. You have to remember that a .63 will be very laggy on a small 1.6 with a 7000rpm redline. You won't hit full boost until 5500+ rpms depending on other variables in the setup (manifold, exhaust and downpipe size, etc.) The best time to use the .63 is if you are going for top whp #'s on 8000+rpm redline. You have to be careful, alot of the people recommending the .63 are thinking B Series (high redline).
02-23-2004, 12:46 PM
#14
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
B-series are running .82 ar now and some T4's, D-guys should be running .63 ar.
I'm willing to give up 500 rpm spool time inorder to make more peak HP, and a Tq curve that carries further to redline. Thats the price you pay for an efficient set up.
Thank the lag for the traction and the snail for the action
I'm willing to give up 500 rpm spool time inorder to make more peak HP, and a Tq curve that carries further to redline. Thats the price you pay for an efficient set up.
Thank the lag for the traction and the snail for the action
02-23-2004, 01:19 PM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ELSpool)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ELSpool »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B-series are running .82 ar now and some T4's, D-guys should be running .63 ar.
I'm willing to give up 500 rpm spool time inorder to make more peak HP, and a Tq curve that carries further to redline. Thats the price you pay for an efficient set up.
Thank the lag for the traction and the snail for the action </TD></TR></TABLE>
.82 A/R is ridiculously big. The .63 A/R is going to be good for 500+whp with most turbos. Get 500whp on the street with that big of an A/R and then you will experience real traction problems. The better powerband is worth it IMO. The spool up will be 1000rpms faster, if not more. So many people are shooting for the top end number, when the car may be faster with a smaller top end number and a better powerband. Either way I'm sure your setup will be killer and I can't wait to see dyno results.
When will the setup be complete BTW?
I'm willing to give up 500 rpm spool time inorder to make more peak HP, and a Tq curve that carries further to redline. Thats the price you pay for an efficient set up.
Thank the lag for the traction and the snail for the action
</TD></TR></TABLE>.82 A/R is ridiculously big. The .63 A/R is going to be good for 500+whp with most turbos. Get 500whp on the street with that big of an A/R and then you will experience real traction problems. The better powerband is worth it IMO. The spool up will be 1000rpms faster, if not more. So many people are shooting for the top end number, when the car may be faster with a smaller top end number and a better powerband. Either way I'm sure your setup will be killer and I can't wait to see dyno results.
When will the setup be complete BTW?
02-23-2004, 01:51 PM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (ELSpool)
Wow, everyone's getting their setup done in March. Mine won't be finished until this summer, June/July. This is what my setup will be:
Precision SC50 with .48 A/R
Precision AS1025 intercooler
Lovefab SST mani and downpipe
Tial BOV and 38mm wastegate
RC Engineering 550cc injectors
Hondata S200
Precision SC50 with .48 A/R
Precision AS1025 intercooler
Lovefab SST mani and downpipe
Tial BOV and 38mm wastegate
RC Engineering 550cc injectors
Hondata S200
and come drag racing at the track with some slicks. And see what these D's can do. 
03-04-2004, 07:49 PM
#19
Re: (JDMCRX)
Progress so far
The motor is all out ill post some pics its going to the machine shop to get Pistons and rods installed balanced and the head im doing some port work on it and then a 3 angle then putting it all togther.
The tranny im putting in a Quief LSD and checkin all the gears out and syncros.
So i hope all goes well i hope to have it all done for mid april.
The motor is all out ill post some pics its going to the machine shop to get Pistons and rods installed balanced and the head im doing some port work on it and then a 3 angle then putting it all togther.
The tranny im putting in a Quief LSD and checkin all the gears out and syncros.
So i hope all goes well i hope to have it all done for mid april.
03-21-2004, 08:10 PM
#20
Re: (JDMCRX)
hey guys so fare the head is all done fully ported and polishe im just waiting for my REV valves to come in.
The block is all done i polished the walls up and debured them for better oil return. the head is also de bured so the oil goes to the pan faster. I also had to notch the block for the EAGLE rods to clear.
here are some pics
The block is all done i polished the walls up and debured them for better oil return. the head is also de bured so the oil goes to the pan faster. I also had to notch the block for the EAGLE rods to clear.
here are some pics
03-22-2004, 05:14 AM
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Posts: 6,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (JDMCRX)
for yet another d-series buildup. by summer when most of us should be up and running we should make a D-series turbo ninja website
03-22-2004, 07:00 AM
#24
Re: (RyanCivic2000)
[QUOTE=RyanCivic2000]
.82 A/R is ridiculously big. The .63 A/R is going to be good for 500+whp with most turbos. QUOTE]
A/R can't even be talked about like that. It's just the housing size not the wheel. A 45trim with a .63 a/r is nothing like a 57trim .63a/r. Wheel size is how you size turbos and then fine tune it with housings.
I run a 50 trim T3 with a .63 A/R and it certainly will not make 500+ hp. It wouldn't even approach that with .82 a/r.
Correlating different engine series with different A/Rs is the most ridiculous idea.
don't mean to jump on you guys but thats just not how you size turbos.
.82 A/R is ridiculously big. The .63 A/R is going to be good for 500+whp with most turbos. QUOTE]
A/R can't even be talked about like that. It's just the housing size not the wheel. A 45trim with a .63 a/r is nothing like a 57trim .63a/r. Wheel size is how you size turbos and then fine tune it with housings.
I run a 50 trim T3 with a .63 A/R and it certainly will not make 500+ hp. It wouldn't even approach that with .82 a/r.
Correlating different engine series with different A/Rs is the most ridiculous idea.
don't mean to jump on you guys but thats just not how you size turbos.
03-22-2004, 07:06 AM
#25
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Margaritaville
Posts: 7,355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Bailhatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bailhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
A/R can't even be talked about like that. It's just the housing size not the wheel. A 45trim with a .63 a/r is nothing like a 57trim .63a/r. Wheel size is how you size turbos and then fine tune it with housings.
I run a 50 trim T3 with a .63 A/R and it certainly will not make 500+ hp. It wouldn't even approach that with .82 a/r.
Correlating different engine series with different A/Rs is the most ridiculous idea.
don't mean to jump on you guys but thats just not how you size turbos.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was speaking of T3/T4 50 trims only. I know a T3 won't make that kind of power, but a T3/T4 can. I was only referring to the fact that with a bigger A/R and the same size wheel you will make more top end power.
A/R can't even be talked about like that. It's just the housing size not the wheel. A 45trim with a .63 a/r is nothing like a 57trim .63a/r. Wheel size is how you size turbos and then fine tune it with housings.
I run a 50 trim T3 with a .63 A/R and it certainly will not make 500+ hp. It wouldn't even approach that with .82 a/r.
Correlating different engine series with different A/Rs is the most ridiculous idea.
don't mean to jump on you guys but thats just not how you size turbos.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I was speaking of T3/T4 50 trims only. I know a T3 won't make that kind of power, but a T3/T4 can. I was only referring to the fact that with a bigger A/R and the same size wheel you will make more top end power.