Notices

1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2012, 03:11 PM
  #1  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

I have a high compression b16 block (11:9.1) in my car now, considering pulling it out and replacing it with a semi-stock b18c1 block (nippon pistons 9:3.1 stock rods). I'm aware b16's are a tad bit on the laggy side, would I notice any BIG difference on how the car responds on the street from just switching shortblocks? The b16 is on E85 at the moment and I would be going back to pump gas if I put the GSR block in the car. I would like full boost around 4k. With the current setup the b16 is hitting full boost a hair after 5k, with a Precision 6031 .63 hotside, 59mm compressor wheel. Don't care about big power numbers i'd be content with 350whp, just a simple street car I just prefer more "USABLE" power for street use/power under the curve so to speak.
Old 01-04-2012, 03:51 PM
  #2  
Honda-Tech Member
 
92frostwhtdb2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plantation, fl, us
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Simple answer, yes. You can wait for other elaborated replies if it makes you feel better.
Old 01-04-2012, 04:08 PM
  #3  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by 92frostwhtdb2
Simple answer, yes. You can wait for other elaborated replies if it makes you feel better.
lol, thanks! although if you took the time to post you might as well have elaborated a bit, all my turbo setups have been b16's, so I dunno what torque and full boost before 5k is:p
Old 01-04-2012, 04:58 PM
  #4  
Honda-Tech Member
 
92frostwhtdb2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plantation, fl, us
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

I could've but I'm on my phone just browsing the forums, its too much off a mission to write a technical reply so I instead answered exactly what you asked lol...the compression ratio in this case is irrelevant below 9:1 maybe ..I doubt you'll be disappointed in anyway
Old 01-04-2012, 05:01 PM
  #5  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by 92frostwhtdb2
I could've but I'm on my phone just browsing the forums, its too much off a mission to write a technical reply so I instead answered exactly what you asked lol...the compression ratio in this case is irrelevant below 9:1 maybe ..I doubt you'll be disappointed in anyway
yeah i'm sure going from a 81x77 to a 81.5x87.2 regardless of CR should make a noticeable difference just wanted some feedback/elaborated answers. Thanks though, yeah that's a mission replying from a phone lol.
Old 01-04-2012, 05:30 PM
  #6  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nealnanoHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Personally I would just stick with the B16 built block, if it is sleeved and this is coming for a 1.8L all the way guy. If not then go for the GSR block, sell the B16 block and get some rods for it. The GSR block has more over the B16 than just being larger. Peak boost will be minimal compared to the 2 blocks the B16 is higher compression so it will be more responsive but the B18 is slightly larger and will make more low end tq and has a longer stoke. The B18 may spool up the turbo a few hundered rpms sooner. If you only are shooting for around 350whp a change in turbos will get you the lower peak boost and still get you the 350whp with room.
Old 01-04-2012, 07:11 PM
  #7  
Honda-Tech Member
 
crvtectim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pensacola, FL.
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Man, if you really want to improve your powerband, consider a big ***, quality final drive like mfactory. What transmission are you running?
Old 01-04-2012, 07:24 PM
  #8  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by nealnanoHX
Personally I would just stick with the B16 built block, if it is sleeved and this is coming for a 1.8L all the way guy. If not then go for the GSR block, sell the B16 block and get some rods for it. The GSR block has more over the B16 than just being larger. Peak boost will be minimal compared to the 2 blocks the B16 is higher compression so it will be more responsive but the B18 is slightly larger and will make more low end tq and has a longer stoke. The B18 may spool up the turbo a few hundered rpms sooner. If you only are shooting for around 350whp a change in turbos will get you the lower peak boost and still get you the 350whp with room.
sorry I didn't clarify, the b16 is a stock motor other than CTR pistons.
Old 01-04-2012, 07:25 PM
  #9  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by crvtectim
Man, if you really want to improve your powerband, consider a big ***, quality final drive like mfactory. What transmission are you running?
a cable J1 b16 trans, not sure i'd be to happy to run a 4.7 or even a 4.9 FD set on boost, and I doubt they even make them for the older cable transmissions.
Old 01-04-2012, 10:24 PM
  #10  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Spawne32's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

1.6 liters are torqueless wonders because of the 81x77 rod/stroke
Old 01-05-2012, 08:03 AM
  #11  
Honda-Tech Member
 
crvtectim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pensacola, FL.
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by GEN2 LS
a cable J1 b16 trans, not sure i'd be to happy to run a 4.7 or even a 4.9 FD set on boost, and I doubt they even make them for the older cable transmissions.
Ah ****, nevermind, your gears are short enough with the 4.4 FD.
Old 01-05-2012, 09:39 AM
  #12  
Honda-Tech Member
 
FlewByU352's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,770
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by Spawne32
1.6 liters are torqueless wonders because of the 81x77 rod/stroke
But dem revs! More displacement is better for spooling turbos as well which is why the 1.8L is a better choice. More air physically filling the cylinders, more exhaust to spool the turbo quicker. It is a win/win situation.
Old 01-05-2012, 09:50 AM
  #13  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nealnanoHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by GEN2 LS
sorry I didn't clarify, the b16 is a stock motor other than CTR pistons.
Then yeah for sure swap to the GSR block, sell the B16 and get some rods for the GSR to beef it up a little more. The bigger GSR motor will make more power and has some tq. The B18B1 is even better, it has a slightly longer stroke than the GSR but is a bit weaker.
Old 01-05-2012, 10:09 AM
  #14  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Bseriescivic5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mid atlantic
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Personally, I dont think your going to see a real significant difference.... The most significant advantage I see here is that you will have a larger knock threshold by switching to the GSR block.... (are you going to continue to use E85 with the GSR?); Even if you decide to go to pump gas with the GSR, its still nice to have soom comfort room with the lowered compression. The tune has to be spot on for High compression turbo engines, but Im sure you already know this.

Bottom line, expect a ~500rpm sooner spool with the larger block, and a larger knock threshold as well, assuming you are sticking with e85, although I would imagine it would still be plenty safe on pump 93
Old 01-05-2012, 10:37 AM
  #15  
Honda-Tech Member
 
crvtectim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Pensacola, FL.
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

I'm thinkin' a new turbo will be best. Plenty of choices that will spool faster and hit 350.
Old 01-05-2012, 04:38 PM
  #16  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nealnanoHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

The GSR will also be better when out of boost, the B16 is a snail down low. Keeping the GSR a stock 10:1 will make is peepy when not in boost and spool up the turbo nicely with the high compression and longer stroke. I know the B16 the OP has is 11.9:1 and the GSR he is looking at is 9.3:1. At 9.3:1 it will still be decent down low, 10:1 will be funner though.
Old 01-05-2012, 04:40 PM
  #17  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by Bseriescivic5
Personally, I dont think your going to see a real significant difference.... The most significant advantage I see here is that you will have a larger knock threshold by switching to the GSR block.... (are you going to continue to use E85 with the GSR?); Even if you decide to go to pump gas with the GSR, its still nice to have soom comfort room with the lowered compression. The tune has to be spot on for High compression turbo engines, but Im sure you already know this.

Bottom line, expect a ~500rpm sooner spool with the larger block, and a larger knock threshold as well, assuming you are sticking with e85, although I would imagine it would still be plenty safe on pump 93
if I went with the GSR block I would go back to pump gas, only reason I am using E85 is because of the CR of the b16 motor, my only gripe about E85 is the availability in my area isn't the greatest so I find my self going out of my way alot to get gas. I even carry two 5 gallons jugs in the hatch for reserve tanks in case I get caught way out from the nearest E85 station. If all I will see is prob a 500 rpm sooner spool I don't think it will be worth all the work. I'm prob gonna just go get the car retuned on a higher boost pressure, maybe once the turbo is in it's efficiency range it might help the spool and wake up. 9psi isn't hardly anything on this turbo, I think once I turn it up to at least 13psi then I should be happy.
Old 01-05-2012, 04:49 PM
  #18  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nealnanoHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

You can run the B16 on 93 or even 91 pump gas it all in the tune. You really just need to decide if you want a more potential motor for more peak power or just better turbo response. If you are unhappy with the laggy turbo you have then a here are a few to look at that will do 350-425hp and spool around 3500-4000rpms. This is when I want boost for my DD so these are all turbos I look at and considered.
Garrett T3T4 50 trim
Garrett T3T4 57 trim AR stg 3
Garrett T3T4 60 trim
Garrett GT3255B
All will meat your needs and are $800 or less. These are all pretty common turbos for a B series street car.
Old 01-05-2012, 07:49 PM
  #19  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Tony the Tiger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

350 WHP and spool around 4K RPM? It has to be a 1.8L
Old 01-05-2012, 07:55 PM
  #20  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by nealnanoHX
You can run the B16 on 93 or even 91 pump gas it all in the tune. You really just need to decide if you want a more potential motor for more peak power or just better turbo response. If you are unhappy with the laggy turbo you have then a here are a few to look at that will do 350-425hp and spool around 3500-4000rpms. This is when I want boost for my DD so these are all turbos I look at and considered.
Garrett T3T4 50 trim
Garrett T3T4 57 trim AR stg 3
Garrett T3T4 60 trim
Garrett GT3255B
All will meat your needs and are $800 or less. These are all pretty common turbos for a B series street car.
a smaller turbo would solve my problem, but my current turbo is maybe a year old with maybe 5,000 miles on it, if that.
Old 01-06-2012, 07:59 AM
  #21  
Honda-Tech Member
 
92frostwhtdb2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Plantation, fl, us
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

you should really consider the want 1.8 swap.The main reason your looking to go this route is to have a better powerband, not having to wait as long for the power to come on correct?(you only want 350whp). Stock for stock driving a b16 vs b18c is no comparison.Don't just look at a number in terms of spool time remember with the increased displacement your adding torque and more of it lower in the rpm range versus the 1.6 that combined with forced induction is going to increase your all around output compared to the b16. If you see were im coming from dont look at it like just, me spooled at x amount of rpm is only what im looking for, you wouldnt have the need for an increased time in spool if your midrange and off boost powerband were more to your liking.
Old 01-06-2012, 09:38 AM
  #22  
Honda-Tech Member
 
nealnanoHX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

^ There is a reason I went LS Vtec for a turbo build.
Old 01-06-2012, 10:24 AM
  #23  
Honda-Tech Member
 
H22AFerio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Olympia,Wa
Posts: 4,592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by Tony the Tiger
350 WHP and spool around 4K RPM? It has to be a 1.8L
X2
Old 01-06-2012, 12:30 PM
  #24  
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
GEN2 LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,179
Received 56 Likes on 42 Posts
Default Re: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?

Originally Posted by 92frostwhtdb2
you should really consider the want 1.8 swap.The main reason your looking to go this route is to have a better powerband, not having to wait as long for the power to come on correct?(you only want 350whp). Stock for stock driving a b16 vs b18c is no comparison.Don't just look at a number in terms of spool time remember with the increased displacement your adding torque and more of it lower in the rpm range versus the 1.6 that combined with forced induction is going to increase your all around output compared to the b16. If you see were im coming from dont look at it like just, me spooled at x amount of rpm is only what im looking for, you wouldnt have the need for an increased time in spool if your midrange and off boost powerband were more to your liking.
I see exactly where you are coming from.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jceltalentoso
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
01-15-2012 10:00 PM
rich7777
Forced Induction
5
11-09-2011 12:49 AM
beardugo
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
01-29-2006 05:56 AM
ScottEK
Forced Induction
15
11-30-2004 01:54 AM
B18PoweredCivic
Forced Induction
1
02-18-2003 07:16 PM



Quick Reply: 1.6 vs 1.8 Powerband?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 AM.