08/08 12.79 @ 112mph
#1
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
08/08 12.79 @ 112mph
hey, all. here's the latest from the lil' acura. only got two runs. missed third gear, not once.. but BOTH times. oh well:
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
#2
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (kaj)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kaj »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey, all. here's the latest from the lil' acura. only got two runs. missed third gear, not once.. but BOTH times. oh well:
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">okay. i'm pissed but happy. here's the run:
60' = 2.052
1/8 = 8.544
mph = 85.13
1/4 = 13.059
mph = 110.67
for those of you studying this: i missed third gear. i can't BELIEVE IT!
only got two runs in.. got my 60' down to 2.0 and missed third gear both runs. damn i suck.
anyway, i'm hoping to run a 12.9-12.8 when i learn to drive
i have the time slip in front of me. i'll photocopy it, maybe tomorrow, and post it/email/etc.
it was good to have everyone out there. a saw nick and andrew.. i was with my other friend nick and Ryan. where was everyone?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I wonder which is the truth
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
</TD></TR></TABLE>
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">okay. i'm pissed but happy. here's the run:
60' = 2.052
1/8 = 8.544
mph = 85.13
1/4 = 13.059
mph = 110.67
for those of you studying this: i missed third gear. i can't BELIEVE IT!
only got two runs in.. got my 60' down to 2.0 and missed third gear both runs. damn i suck.
anyway, i'm hoping to run a 12.9-12.8 when i learn to drive
i have the time slip in front of me. i'll photocopy it, maybe tomorrow, and post it/email/etc.
it was good to have everyone out there. a saw nick and andrew.. i was with my other friend nick and Ryan. where was everyone?? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I wonder which is the truth
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 2,802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (99Hybrid_Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99Hybrid_Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
I wonder which is the truth</TD></TR></TABLE>
That looks like a copy/paste error. I'D HOPE If you look, the run below is the one he posted. may have been an accident
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
I wonder which is the truth</TD></TR></TABLE>
That looks like a copy/paste error. I'D HOPE If you look, the run below is the one he posted. may have been an accident
#6
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (99Hybrid_Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> originally posted by kaj »
hey, all. here's the latest from the lil' acura. only got two runs. missed third gear, not once.. but BOTH times. oh well:
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
Quote »
okay. i'm pissed but happy. here's the run:
60' = 2.052
1/8 = 8.544
mph = 85.13
1/4 = 13.059
mph = 110.67
for those of you studying this: i missed third gear. i can't BELIEVE IT!
only got two runs in.. got my 60' down to 2.0 and missed third gear both runs. damn i suck.
anyway, i'm hoping to run a 12.9-12.8 when i learn to drive
i have the time slip in front of me. i'll photocopy it, maybe tomorrow, and post it/email/etc.
it was good to have everyone out there. a saw nick and andrew.. i was with my other friend nick and Ryan. where was everyone??
I wonder which is the truth"</TD></TR></TABLE>
sheesh. always gotta be the hater, huh bro? remember: I WASN'T baggin on you on CVSR. remember? LOL
don't be all butt hurt because i asked you questions about your set up
check all the posts on CVSR and figure it out.
Modified by kaj at 5:55 PM 8/9/2003
hey, all. here's the latest from the lil' acura. only got two runs. missed third gear, not once.. but BOTH times. oh well:
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
> 1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
> MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
> 1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
> MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
maybe i can squeeze a 12.5
also this is with my boost controller going haywire.
in fourth gear i was at 13psi.. by the time i hit the trap it was down to 10psi. i give up on that thing. profec licks *****, just so ya'll know.
SlicksMH: good to meet you there last night. I'm Jason with the red Integra. you were talking with us 'till they shut the lights off on us :D
hmm...this is a post from kaj on another board saying something differant
http://24.55.7.178/odd/board/c...21861
Quote »
okay. i'm pissed but happy. here's the run:
60' = 2.052
1/8 = 8.544
mph = 85.13
1/4 = 13.059
mph = 110.67
for those of you studying this: i missed third gear. i can't BELIEVE IT!
only got two runs in.. got my 60' down to 2.0 and missed third gear both runs. damn i suck.
anyway, i'm hoping to run a 12.9-12.8 when i learn to drive
i have the time slip in front of me. i'll photocopy it, maybe tomorrow, and post it/email/etc.
it was good to have everyone out there. a saw nick and andrew.. i was with my other friend nick and Ryan. where was everyone??
I wonder which is the truth"</TD></TR></TABLE>
sheesh. always gotta be the hater, huh bro? remember: I WASN'T baggin on you on CVSR. remember? LOL
don't be all butt hurt because i asked you questions about your set up
check all the posts on CVSR and figure it out.
Modified by kaj at 5:55 PM 8/9/2003
Trending Topics
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (thrty8street)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by thrty8street »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">come one man if your gonna post this at least inform us. what car, year, whats your setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i have before. didn't wanna be redundant. this was for the people that i know on herre that i've been sharing my times with. no prob, though here you go:
*'94 GSR
*completely stock B18c
*Rev Hard Stage 2c with Precision SC34 (t04e housing, 57 trim , t31 wheel, .60/.63)
*still running FMU, etc but i don't drive the car TOO hard on a regular basis. hondata is supposedly on the way, as are pistion/rods, and possibly sleeves (but at a much later date $$$).
*cast manifold
*car is fully loaded; a/c, p/s, cc, abs, etc.
**to answer the post above:
205 BFG DRs on 15" heliums
i have before. didn't wanna be redundant. this was for the people that i know on herre that i've been sharing my times with. no prob, though here you go:
*'94 GSR
*completely stock B18c
*Rev Hard Stage 2c with Precision SC34 (t04e housing, 57 trim , t31 wheel, .60/.63)
*still running FMU, etc but i don't drive the car TOO hard on a regular basis. hondata is supposedly on the way, as are pistion/rods, and possibly sleeves (but at a much later date $$$).
*cast manifold
*car is fully loaded; a/c, p/s, cc, abs, etc.
**to answer the post above:
205 BFG DRs on 15" heliums
#9
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (0x64)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 0x64 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What tires were these runs with? Good runs though. Are you using a Profec-B?</TD></TR></TABLE>
profec a and it sucks nuts.
profec a and it sucks nuts.
#10
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (kaj)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kaj »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
sheesh. always gotta be the hater, huh bro? remember: I WASN'T baggin on you on CVSR. remember? LOL
don't be all butt hurt because i asked you questions about your set up
check all the posts on CVSR and figure it out.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no hating here..I just see on cvsr that you said you would have hit a 12 if you didnt miss third then see here that you could have hit 12.5 if you didnt miss third..so whats the real deal? no hating just show a 12.79 time slip for your car and all will be over..I just donr see how you post 13.0 on cvsr and 12.7 here on H-T.
even the tread title is differant between the 2 site's 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph here on H-t and 13.0 @ 110.67 on cvsr..so which one is real?
what ryan autry posted on cvsr..I think this is where kaj gets his 12.7 from.
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.
sheesh. always gotta be the hater, huh bro? remember: I WASN'T baggin on you on CVSR. remember? LOL
don't be all butt hurt because i asked you questions about your set up
check all the posts on CVSR and figure it out.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no hating here..I just see on cvsr that you said you would have hit a 12 if you didnt miss third then see here that you could have hit 12.5 if you didnt miss third..so whats the real deal? no hating just show a 12.79 time slip for your car and all will be over..I just donr see how you post 13.0 on cvsr and 12.7 here on H-T.
even the tread title is differant between the 2 site's 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph here on H-t and 13.0 @ 110.67 on cvsr..so which one is real?
what ryan autry posted on cvsr..I think this is where kaj gets his 12.7 from.
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.
#12
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Augusta, GA, USA
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (99Hybrid_Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99Hybrid_Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
no hating here..I just see on cvsr that you said you would have hit a 12 if you didnt miss third then see here that you could have hit 12.5 if you didnt miss third..so whats the real deal? no hating just show a 12.79 time slip for your car and all will be over..I just donr see how you post 13.0 on cvsr and 12.7 here on H-T.
even the tread title is differant between the 2 site's 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph here on H-t and 13.0 @ 110.67 on cvsr..so which one is real?
what ryan autry posted on cvsr..I think this is where kaj gets his 12.7 from.
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I see your point but dude what is the big ****** deal. Are you gonna give him more respect or something if he actually ran a 12.7 or less is he didn't. It no point in even asking him.
no hating here..I just see on cvsr that you said you would have hit a 12 if you didnt miss third then see here that you could have hit 12.5 if you didnt miss third..so whats the real deal? no hating just show a 12.79 time slip for your car and all will be over..I just donr see how you post 13.0 on cvsr and 12.7 here on H-T.
even the tread title is differant between the 2 site's 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph here on H-t and 13.0 @ 110.67 on cvsr..so which one is real?
what ryan autry posted on cvsr..I think this is where kaj gets his 12.7 from.
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I see your point but dude what is the big ****** deal. Are you gonna give him more respect or something if he actually ran a 12.7 or less is he didn't. It no point in even asking him.
#13
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (99Hybrid_Hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99Hybrid_Hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i don't need to explain myself.. you already did that for me:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0 </TD></TR></TABLE>
i'm not gonna litter HT with "this time and my corrected time of..." blah. blah. here i get right to the point of what the car ran. nobody here wants to here excuses and explainations.
the 12.79 is the same time i would have had at any track on that day.. at that time. you have to have a consistent basis for times in order to tell how good you are doing. just ask NHRA.
and if i DO need to explain further.. see:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by viprcr1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I see your point but dude what is the big ****** deal. Are you gonna give him more respect or something if he actually ran a 12.7 or less is he didn't. It no point in even asking him.</TD></TR></TABLE>
werd
I dont care if your car does 14's or 10's.I just think its wrong to mislead people and post 2 differant times for no reason.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i don't need to explain myself.. you already did that for me:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Times:
Jason
<U>Corrected: </u> <---Note it says corrected and is not the real time
60ft . . . . . . 2.09 . . . . 2.05
1/8th . . . . .8.64 . . . . . 8.37
MPH . . . . . 82.61 . . . . 86.82
1/4 . . . . . . .13.21 . . . . 12.79
MPH . . . . . 109.78 . . . 112.87
<u>Actual: </u> <---These are his real times..misleading or no?
13.05@110.67 w/2.0
13.48@107.64 w/2.0 </TD></TR></TABLE>
i'm not gonna litter HT with "this time and my corrected time of..." blah. blah. here i get right to the point of what the car ran. nobody here wants to here excuses and explainations.
the 12.79 is the same time i would have had at any track on that day.. at that time. you have to have a consistent basis for times in order to tell how good you are doing. just ask NHRA.
and if i DO need to explain further.. see:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by viprcr1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I see your point but dude what is the big ****** deal. Are you gonna give him more respect or something if he actually ran a 12.7 or less is he didn't. It no point in even asking him.</TD></TR></TABLE>
werd
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (99Hybrid_Hatch)
[QUOTE]
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
[\QUOTE]
oh, i forgot:
Time: 10pm
> Temp: 82.4º
> Pressure: 29.92 inches
> Humidity: 45%
> DA Factor: 1700ft
>
> .9806 - ET
> 1.0199 - MPH
>
that's how you use DA factor to figure out corrected times.
all this is beside the point.. you and i have close to the same setup. we should be using that to spur each other on to improve on the performance of our cars. if any of the above info helps, then i'll consider it trade for the links you gave me to the guy that does exhausts
cya at the track!!!
also how do you correct a time? there are so much differant things that can happen so why would you post the corrected time ryan posted on cvsr?
[\QUOTE]
oh, i forgot:
Time: 10pm
> Temp: 82.4º
> Pressure: 29.92 inches
> Humidity: 45%
> DA Factor: 1700ft
>
> .9806 - ET
> 1.0199 - MPH
>
that's how you use DA factor to figure out corrected times.
all this is beside the point.. you and i have close to the same setup. we should be using that to spur each other on to improve on the performance of our cars. if any of the above info helps, then i'll consider it trade for the links you gave me to the guy that does exhausts
cya at the track!!!
#16
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (kaj)
So you're running 10-13psi on stock block?? With what management? high 12s is a bloody good time for a stock GSR What sort of power and torque is it pushing out?
#19
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (swlabhot)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedsiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cna somebody shut this cluster **** post down that or show some ****** time slips with your boys to vouch</TD></TR></TABLE>
no offense, but if you don't like it, don't click on it. i'm sharing info for anyone who cares (or has questions), not for those who don't. i, for one, like hearing of other's accomplishments. i'm not here to please nor prove anything to you. thanks anyway.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by swlabhot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So you're running 10-13psi on stock block?? With what management? high 12s is a bloody good time for a stock GSR What sort of power and torque is it pushing out?</TD></TR></TABLE>
stock block and FMU. i KNOW: i'm crazy. it's VERY rare i run this much boost. i am saving for Hondata as we speak. hopefully i'll have it before the motor goes .
i'm taking the car to dyno so i can check a/f ratio just to be a bit more safe i'll have some numbers then. all we can do is assume right now. 140h.p. stock, plus we're thinking 10h.p. per psi. of boost. so GUESSING 270h.p. no idea of torque.
DIREP (??) ran pretty much the EXACT same time with the same 60' etc and is putting down 275-280 at the wheels. again 270h.p. is only an estimate.
no offense, but if you don't like it, don't click on it. i'm sharing info for anyone who cares (or has questions), not for those who don't. i, for one, like hearing of other's accomplishments. i'm not here to please nor prove anything to you. thanks anyway.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by swlabhot »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So you're running 10-13psi on stock block?? With what management? high 12s is a bloody good time for a stock GSR What sort of power and torque is it pushing out?</TD></TR></TABLE>
stock block and FMU. i KNOW: i'm crazy. it's VERY rare i run this much boost. i am saving for Hondata as we speak. hopefully i'll have it before the motor goes .
i'm taking the car to dyno so i can check a/f ratio just to be a bit more safe i'll have some numbers then. all we can do is assume right now. 140h.p. stock, plus we're thinking 10h.p. per psi. of boost. so GUESSING 270h.p. no idea of torque.
DIREP (??) ran pretty much the EXACT same time with the same 60' etc and is putting down 275-280 at the wheels. again 270h.p. is only an estimate.
#20
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (kaj)
No offense, and i am not hating hating on you....but truth be known...i don't see you hooking that well out the hole with what you are running and your mph isn't right if you aren't hooking dead out the hole.You must have a killer suspension setup! Prove me wrong or let the bullshit run a marathon. Peace-
edit: If this is the case than my civic h/b should run 12.0's with a b16 @ 16psi......
Modified by XratedSi at 2:58 AM 8/12/2003
edit: If this is the case than my civic h/b should run 12.0's with a b16 @ 16psi......
Modified by XratedSi at 2:58 AM 8/12/2003
#21
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (XratedSi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by XratedSi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
edit: If this is the case than my civic h/b should run 12.0's with a b16 @ 16psi......
Modified by XratedSi at 2:58 AM 8/12/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
maybe it should.
remember psi doesn't = power. cfm = power.
by the way: a 2.0 on BFG's isn't THAT great.
in any case this thread IS my "marathon". if you don't like it, feel free to walk (pun intended hahaaaaaa).
my friends were witnesses and people i know on here know what's up. that's all i need. not approval from some guy from "who knows where". and a N00B at that.
so: no offense taken.
edit: If this is the case than my civic h/b should run 12.0's with a b16 @ 16psi......
Modified by XratedSi at 2:58 AM 8/12/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
maybe it should.
remember psi doesn't = power. cfm = power.
by the way: a 2.0 on BFG's isn't THAT great.
in any case this thread IS my "marathon". if you don't like it, feel free to walk (pun intended hahaaaaaa).
my friends were witnesses and people i know on here know what's up. that's all i need. not approval from some guy from "who knows where". and a N00B at that.
so: no offense taken.
#22
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cenral Valley, CA, U.S.A.
Posts: 2,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: 08/08 12.79 @ 112mph (kaj)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mikey3000
Drag Racing
13
09-24-2007 08:17 AM