***The Official JRSC Thread***
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
Ok, so you're probably going to want 3" collector header with short, fat primaries and then a 3" exhaust.
If sound is an issue for you, then you could run a noise canceling valve type muffler or twin loop axle back.
I think the ideal daily setup would be 3" collector header and an e-cutout, then a twinloop catback to quiet the system down.
If sound is an issue for you, then you could run a noise canceling valve type muffler or twin loop axle back.
I think the ideal daily setup would be 3" collector header and an e-cutout, then a twinloop catback to quiet the system down.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
^ IMO the stock catback (even itr) is a bottleneck.
That being said:
APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic
looks interesting.
That being said:
APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic
looks interesting.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
^ I figured as much.
I know my friends in Cali run a ported jdm 4-1 with the heat shield so they look carb compliant - you may have the same reason in AZ.
For boosted setups, I will always recommend 3" header back for power.
I know this isn't always practical due to noise / carb / emissions limitations...
Wasn't there a 3" big tube knockoff floating around eBay for a while?
I wouldn't mind testing one of those vs 3" kamikaze.
Anyway, a base map is just that - it should get you to be able to start the car and then you street tune a bit for partial throttle - preferably on the way to the dyno where you do your full throttle tuning.
Hopefully you have a wideband.
I know my friends in Cali run a ported jdm 4-1 with the heat shield so they look carb compliant - you may have the same reason in AZ.
For boosted setups, I will always recommend 3" header back for power.
I know this isn't always practical due to noise / carb / emissions limitations...
Wasn't there a 3" big tube knockoff floating around eBay for a while?
I wouldn't mind testing one of those vs 3" kamikaze.
Anyway, a base map is just that - it should get you to be able to start the car and then you street tune a bit for partial throttle - preferably on the way to the dyno where you do your full throttle tuning.
Hopefully you have a wideband.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
I'm at a standstill.
I posted in this thread near the bottom:
https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/
vtec-less and idk why...
I posted in this thread near the bottom:
https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/
vtec-less and idk why...
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
^ IMO the stock catback (even itr) is a bottleneck.
That being said:
APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic
looks interesting.
That being said:
APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic
looks interesting.
talks to himself
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
I'm at a standstill.
I posted in this thread near the bottom:
https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/
vtec-less and idk why...
I posted in this thread near the bottom:
https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/
vtec-less and idk why...
Take apart the rockers, vtec solenoid housing, and rocker rails and clean everything. You may have blockage or a leak between the cam caps and the rails preventing sufficient oil pressure from building up behind the pistons that lock the rocker arms together. Clean everything and replace the o-rings between the cam caps and the rails. I recently watch a video from nthefastlane that mentioned the o-rings as a common problem.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
^ already did all of the above - no joke.
I spent all day Saturday going through every part of the head cleaning and looking for anything.
Disassembled all the rocker arms, cleaned inside them, lubed them, rocker shafts, basically everything in the head.
I spent all day Saturday going through every part of the head cleaning and looking for anything.
Disassembled all the rocker arms, cleaned inside them, lubed them, rocker shafts, basically everything in the head.
Last edited by Black R; 03-28-2017 at 07:12 PM.
talks to himself
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
Did you replace the o-ring?: VTEC NOT ENGAGING PROPERLY THIS COULD BE YOUR FIX - Nthefastlane
Clean the solenoid shafts?: MISTAKEN HEAD GASKET LEAK HONDA VTEC SOLENOID RESEAL - Nthefastlane
Seems like JRCivic may have already mentioned these things in the other thread but, just in case.
Clean the solenoid shafts?: MISTAKEN HEAD GASKET LEAK HONDA VTEC SOLENOID RESEAL - Nthefastlane
Seems like JRCivic may have already mentioned these things in the other thread but, just in case.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
^ yessir.
I've gone through all tr troubleshooting procedures outlined in the Helms manual.
I posted mostly in that other thread.
It's not the solenoid.
It's possible that this head has an oil passage blocked bc it was used in an LSvtec build at one point - so I'm going to do the oil pressure test (bc it's failing the air pressure test), and also run an external LSvtec oil line to the passage on the intake side of the head at the oil port near the distributor.
I've gone through all tr troubleshooting procedures outlined in the Helms manual.
I posted mostly in that other thread.
It's not the solenoid.
It's possible that this head has an oil passage blocked bc it was used in an LSvtec build at one point - so I'm going to do the oil pressure test (bc it's failing the air pressure test), and also run an external LSvtec oil line to the passage on the intake side of the head at the oil port near the distributor.
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
Why not? Forced induction application, I don't have any dyno proof but I would bet money that a 3" would gain power at all RPM vs a 2.5" or even a 2.36"
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
You guys realize that 400whp N/A 2.4 liter K series are still running 2.5" collectors right?
You want velocity at the collector.
I'd be very curious to see any dynos at all of going from a 2.5" header to this Kamikaze header. I suspect power gains are doubtful.
In this multiple-hundred-page thread, is there a single dyno of anyone replacing a good header with the Kamikaze?
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
2 minutes of research reveals that in 2017, you guys are still going off statements made by Larry Widmer in 2002... And also, Larry was using a Kamakazi header with a 2.5" collector, and the main reason he went with that header was the short primaries. However, large tube primaries would give you the same effect, and in 2017 I'm willing to bet there are better options that the Kamikaze header which was honestly a pile of **** 20 years ago.
But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.
But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
My HyTech header, custom built to my specifications based on a 300 wheel HP 1.9L high compression "B" series JRSC foundation, is a short primary, big tube, stepped 4-1 header with a 2.5" collector. I used this same header on my new Rotrex build and made 540 wheel HP. I am confident... and agree with 2LEM1... that a 3" collector on a "B" series JRSC engine will not perform any better than a properly sized 2.5" collector header.
Honda-Tech Member
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
2 minutes of research reveals that in 2017, you guys are still going off statements made by Larry Widmer in 2002... And also, Larry was using a Kamakazi header with a 2.5" collector, and the main reason he went with that header was the short primaries. However, large tube primaries would give you the same effect, and in 2017 I'm willing to bet there are better options that the Kamikaze header which was honestly a pile of **** 20 years ago.
But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.
But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.
NA and FI are pretty different imo.
I've seen no detriment from running 3" on boosted applications vs anything smaller.
Power just comes on earlier and gains are noticeable.
This reminds me of when people told me that open header NA would lose power and velocity bla bla bla back in 2000.
I did a back to back comparison on the dyno open header and got gains everywhere in the power band. Everywhere.
I'll post a dyno comparison if anyone wants to let me borrow a 2.5" kamikaze as mine is being modded with a 3" Vband collector.
That would be a very fair comparison because it's the same header.
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
No argument here.
Butt dyno?
That's what I'm saying, has anyone over the last 15 years ever done a header test with a JRSC?
Yep. Anything PAST the collector is just a restriction. Backpressure is not anything you want, and bigger is always better when it comes to exhaust tubing.
It took Hondatech awhile to catch onto things, we didn't exactly have a ton of old hotrodders helping us or anything.
That would be awesome! I can't believe nobody has done that yet.
That's what I'm saying, has anyone over the last 15 years ever done a header test with a JRSC?
It took Hondatech awhile to catch onto things, we didn't exactly have a ton of old hotrodders helping us or anything.
That would be awesome! I can't believe nobody has done that yet.
Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***
i went from jdm itr and 2.5 vibrant exhaust to Toda rep header with 3" thermal R&D exhaust. (both headers had 2.5" collectors) and i gained 12whp on the dyno (average of about 8whp across the whole rpm range). obviously this doesnt speak anything to the "collector size matters" but it does say, there is much more to it than that.