Notices

***The Official JRSC Thread***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-26-2017, 10:39 PM
  #19101  
Honda-Tech Member
 
vtakdis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by Black R
Ok, so you're probably going to want 3" collector header with short, fat primaries and then a 3" exhaust.

If sound is an issue for you, then you could run a noise canceling valve type muffler or twin loop axle back.

I think the ideal daily setup would be 3" collector header and an e-cutout, then a twinloop catback to quiet the system down.
thanks for the help, I actually picked up the 3" modded kamikaze header should be here Wednesday, gonna install it and have the exhaust shop mate it to the factory cat back for now, the e- cutout is probably the route I'm gonna end up going
Old 03-26-2017, 11:14 PM
  #19102  
Honda-Tech Member
 
xchipx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: sheffield, yorkshire, england
Posts: 83
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by slowDB7
Question for you jrsc guys. Theres a some what local guy saying hes running 28psi in his jrsc d16. Ive hever heard of one going that high.

Is that even possible?

YEAH it is possible. I've seen it myself. Infact my bro is running 30psi in his tyres. 😂
Old 03-26-2017, 11:19 PM
  #19103  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

^ IMO the stock catback (even itr) is a bottleneck.

That being said:

​​​​​​​APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic

looks interesting.
Old 03-27-2017, 12:49 AM
  #19104  
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
bigjon1378's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 203
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by Black R
^ that header doesn't look ideal.

Whats your setup?

You in CA?
​​​​​​​it is a JDM ITR 4-1 I'd assume it's the best choice besides a Kamikaze, which I can not find. Also I am in Arizona, the exhaust is 2.25" no cat.
Old 03-27-2017, 05:57 AM
  #19105  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

^ I figured as much.

I know my friends in Cali run a ported jdm 4-1 with the heat shield so they look carb compliant - you may have the same reason in AZ.

For boosted setups, I will always recommend 3" header back for power.

I know this isn't always practical due to noise / carb / emissions limitations...

Wasn't there a 3" big tube knockoff floating around eBay for a while?

I wouldn't mind testing one of those vs 3" kamikaze.

Anyway, a base map is just that - it should get you to be able to start the car and then you street tune a bit for partial throttle - preferably on the way to the dyno where you do your full throttle tuning.

Hopefully you have a wideband.
Old 03-27-2017, 12:17 PM
  #19106  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HeikDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

R, how's the car coming along?
Old 03-27-2017, 03:39 PM
  #19107  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

I'm at a standstill.

I posted in this thread near the bottom:

https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/

​​​​​​​vtec-less and idk why...
Old 03-27-2017, 07:27 PM
  #19108  
Honda-Tech Member
 
vtakdis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 38
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by Black R
^ IMO the stock catback (even itr) is a bottleneck.

That being said:

APEXi Active Tail Silencer (ATS) for Honda Civic

looks interesting.
that does look interesting! The header to stock exhaust is a temp thing, will add an exhaust in the future possibly but really want the car as quiet as possible even if it means loosing a few HP lol
Old 03-28-2017, 06:32 AM
  #19109  
talks to himself
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by Black R
I'm at a standstill.

I posted in this thread near the bottom:

https://honda-tech.com/forums/all-mo...tched-3047572/

vtec-less and idk why...

Take apart the rockers, vtec solenoid housing, and rocker rails and clean everything. You may have blockage or a leak between the cam caps and the rails preventing sufficient oil pressure from building up behind the pistons that lock the rocker arms together. Clean everything and replace the o-rings between the cam caps and the rails. I recently watch a video from nthefastlane that mentioned the o-rings as a common problem.
Old 03-28-2017, 04:07 PM
  #19110  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

^ already did all of the above - no joke.

I spent all day Saturday going through every part of the head cleaning and looking for anything.

Disassembled all the rocker arms, cleaned inside them, lubed them, rocker shafts, basically everything in the head.

Last edited by Black R; 03-28-2017 at 07:12 PM.
Old 03-29-2017, 07:25 AM
  #19111  
talks to himself
 
CX-Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Where YOU live?
Posts: 1,855
Received 78 Likes on 65 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Did you replace the o-ring?: VTEC NOT ENGAGING PROPERLY THIS COULD BE YOUR FIX - Nthefastlane

Clean the solenoid shafts?: MISTAKEN HEAD GASKET LEAK HONDA VTEC SOLENOID RESEAL - Nthefastlane

Seems like JRCivic may have already mentioned these things in the other thread but, just in case.
Old 03-29-2017, 10:01 PM
  #19112  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

O-ring replaced, yup.

Cleaned solenoid and even tried another known good solenoid.
Old 03-30-2017, 07:15 AM
  #19113  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HeikDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

R,

Have you followed the FSM for vtec troubleshooting?
Old 03-30-2017, 11:12 AM
  #19114  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

^ yessir.
I've gone through all tr troubleshooting procedures outlined in the Helms manual.

I posted mostly in that other thread.

It's not the solenoid.

It's possible that this head has an oil passage blocked bc it was used in an LSvtec build at one point - so I'm going to do the oil pressure test (bc it's failing the air pressure test), and also run an external LSvtec oil line to the passage on the intake side of the head at the oil port near the distributor.
Old 03-30-2017, 02:19 PM
  #19115  
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
 
2LEM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yay Area, CA
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

I was just reading through a bit of this for fun... why do you guys use a header with a 3" collector?
Old 03-31-2017, 06:13 AM
  #19116  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HeikDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Why not? Forced induction application, I don't have any dyno proof but I would bet money that a 3" would gain power at all RPM vs a 2.5" or even a 2.36"
Old 03-31-2017, 06:52 AM
  #19117  
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
 
2LEM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yay Area, CA
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by HeikDiesel
Why not? Forced induction application, I don't have any dyno proof but I would bet money that a 3" would gain power at all RPM vs a 2.5" or even a 2.36"
I will take that bet.

You guys realize that 400whp N/A 2.4 liter K series are still running 2.5" collectors right?

You want velocity at the collector.

I'd be very curious to see any dynos at all of going from a 2.5" header to this Kamikaze header. I suspect power gains are doubtful.

In this multiple-hundred-page thread, is there a single dyno of anyone replacing a good header with the Kamikaze?
Old 03-31-2017, 07:00 AM
  #19118  
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
 
2LEM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yay Area, CA
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

2 minutes of research reveals that in 2017, you guys are still going off statements made by Larry Widmer in 2002... And also, Larry was using a Kamakazi header with a 2.5" collector, and the main reason he went with that header was the short primaries. However, large tube primaries would give you the same effect, and in 2017 I'm willing to bet there are better options that the Kamikaze header which was honestly a pile of **** 20 years ago.

But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.
Old 03-31-2017, 09:44 PM
  #19119  
Honda-Tech Member
 
JRCivic1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The South - Roll Tide !!!
Posts: 8,300
Received 797 Likes on 737 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

My HyTech header, custom built to my specifications based on a 300 wheel HP 1.9L high compression "B" series JRSC foundation, is a short primary, big tube, stepped 4-1 header with a 2.5" collector. I used this same header on my new Rotrex build and made 540 wheel HP. I am confident... and agree with 2LEM1... that a 3" collector on a "B" series JRSC engine will not perform any better than a properly sized 2.5" collector header.
Old 04-01-2017, 05:19 AM
  #19120  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Grifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Has anyone run a D series JRSC on E85? If so what kind of power figures did you achieve?
Old 04-01-2017, 05:56 PM
  #19121  
Honda-Tech Member
 
Black R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Atlantis
Posts: 12,948
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by 2LEM1
2 minutes of research reveals that in 2017, you guys are still going off statements made by Larry Widmer in 2002... And also, Larry was using a Kamakazi header with a 2.5" collector, and the main reason he went with that header was the short primaries. However, large tube primaries would give you the same effect, and in 2017 I'm willing to bet there are better options that the Kamikaze header which was honestly a pile of **** 20 years ago.

But hey, I don't know **** about FI, so just ignore me.

NA and FI are pretty different imo.

I've seen no detriment from running 3" on boosted applications vs anything smaller.

Power just comes on earlier and gains are noticeable.

This reminds me of when people told me that open header NA would lose power and velocity bla bla bla back in 2000.

I did a back to back comparison on the dyno open header and got gains everywhere in the power band. Everywhere.

I'll post a dyno comparison if anyone wants to let me borrow a 2.5" kamikaze as mine is being modded with a 3" Vband collector.

That would be a very fair comparison because it's the same header.
Old 04-01-2017, 07:32 PM
  #19122  
I like to party
iTrader: (1)
 
2LEM1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Yay Area, CA
Posts: 4,473
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Originally Posted by Black R
NA and FI are pretty different imo.
No argument here.

Originally Posted by Black R
I've seen no detriment from running 3" on boosted applications vs anything smaller.
Butt dyno?

That's what I'm saying, has anyone over the last 15 years ever done a header test with a JRSC?

Originally Posted by Black R
This reminds me of when people told me that open header NA would lose power and velocity bla bla bla back in 2000.

I did a back to back comparison on the dyno open header and got gains everywhere in the power band. Everywhere.
Yep. Anything PAST the collector is just a restriction. Backpressure is not anything you want, and bigger is always better when it comes to exhaust tubing.

It took Hondatech awhile to catch onto things, we didn't exactly have a ton of old hotrodders helping us or anything.

Originally Posted by Black R
I'll post a dyno comparison if anyone wants to let me borrow a 2.5" kamikaze as mine is being modded with a 3" Vband collector.

That would be a very fair comparison because it's the same header.
That would be awesome! I can't believe nobody has done that yet.
Old 04-02-2017, 10:55 AM
  #19123  
Honda-Tech Member
 
HeikDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Westslope, CO, United States
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Guess I need to buy some 2.5 stuff and re-dyno
Old 04-02-2017, 01:22 PM
  #19124  
EFB055
 
~sp33~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Brisvegas, QLD, Australia
Posts: 13,249
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

Old 04-03-2017, 05:45 AM
  #19125  
Honda-Tech Member
 
angryhillbilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: ***The Official JRSC Thread***

i went from jdm itr and 2.5 vibrant exhaust to Toda rep header with 3" thermal R&D exhaust. (both headers had 2.5" collectors) and i gained 12whp on the dyno (average of about 8whp across the whole rpm range). obviously this doesnt speak anything to the "collector size matters" but it does say, there is much more to it than that.


Quick Reply: ***The Official JRSC Thread***



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:43 PM.