The official MFactory/Agile Concepts H1 car build
#53
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
this should be a nice build. definitely can't wait to see more
had some questions on the motor as i too am building my block.
what size pistons are the p73's? also, is there a reason you chose the us spec versus jdm?
had some questions on the motor as i too am building my block.
what size pistons are the p73's? also, is there a reason you chose the us spec versus jdm?
#54
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: bellingham, Wa, usa
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (donut.)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by donut. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">this should be a nice build. definitely can't wait to see more
had some questions on the motor as i too am building my block.
what size pistons are the p73's? also, is there a reason you chose the us spec versus jdm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
We went with the Usdm pistons because they are lighter weight than the JDM p73's. Also the lower compression works out well with our deck height as this block was salvaged from an ITR in a front end collision. The upper motormount had been ripped from the block and the repairs required decking the block a bit.
This works out well in allowing us to tune the motor to run on pump gas and in warmer climates without having to depend on race fuel.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 11:56 PM 3/28/2008
had some questions on the motor as i too am building my block.
what size pistons are the p73's? also, is there a reason you chose the us spec versus jdm?</TD></TR></TABLE>
We went with the Usdm pistons because they are lighter weight than the JDM p73's. Also the lower compression works out well with our deck height as this block was salvaged from an ITR in a front end collision. The upper motormount had been ripped from the block and the repairs required decking the block a bit.
This works out well in allowing us to tune the motor to run on pump gas and in warmer climates without having to depend on race fuel.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 11:56 PM 3/28/2008
#58
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The official MFactory/Agile Concepts H1 car build (Soichiro's way@MF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Soichiro’s way@MF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
We are waiting on the GS-R head to come back from Stewart Racing Engines where it's receiving a full race port/valve job. There is a set of Toda spec C Camshafts waiting to go in right when it gets here.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You mean Toda C "Style" cams.
We are waiting on the GS-R head to come back from Stewart Racing Engines where it's receiving a full race port/valve job. There is a set of Toda spec C Camshafts waiting to go in right when it gets here.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You mean Toda C "Style" cams.
#60
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: bellingham, Wa, usa
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The official MFactory/Agile Concepts H1 car build (SuperTwinz)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SuperTwinz »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You mean Toda C "Style" cams. </TD></TR></TABLE>
You are correct SuperTwinz. The picture is of a set of Jun 3's for a different engine. The text is accurate in what will be part of the final product.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 10:56 PM 3/30/2008
You mean Toda C "Style" cams. </TD></TR></TABLE>
You are correct SuperTwinz. The picture is of a set of Jun 3's for a different engine. The text is accurate in what will be part of the final product.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 10:56 PM 3/30/2008
#61
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: The official MFactory/Agile Concepts H1 car build (Soichiro's way@MF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Soichiro’s way@MF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
You are correct SuperTwinz. The picture is of a set of Jun 3's for a different engine. The text is accurate in what will be part of the final product.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 10:56 PM 3/30/2008</TD></TR></TABLE>Hahaha I'm just messin with yals.
You are correct SuperTwinz. The picture is of a set of Jun 3's for a different engine. The text is accurate in what will be part of the final product.
Modified by Soichiro's way@MF at 10:56 PM 3/30/2008</TD></TR></TABLE>Hahaha I'm just messin with yals.
#70
Honda-Tech Member
Re: (yee SERIOUS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by yee SERIOUS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">how about something for all mota k. hahaha</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stock 4.3 and 4.7 should be sufficient for most
If not, then our 4.0 should do the trick
Stock 4.3 and 4.7 should be sufficient for most
If not, then our 4.0 should do the trick
#73
Honda-Tech Order of Merit
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 10,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Soichiro's way@MF)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Soichiro’s way@MF »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">We are planning on running both 15" and 16" depending on the track and conditions. For rear aero we will be running a duckbill at the least. We are still considering our options with this though.</TD></TR></TABLE>
it seems like some h1 guys have been moving up to 17's to run larger tire sizes since 16's dont seem to have that many options as far as tires.
it seems like some h1 guys have been moving up to 17's to run larger tire sizes since 16's dont seem to have that many options as far as tires.