My K20 rebuild
#52
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: land of the sheep, home of the hypocrite
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: My K20 rebuild
Looking good! When you got those cams was there any info on how they were different from earlier versions? Different lift/duration or just different profile to allow a higher red line maybe? Also, you may have mentioned this already, but how are you adjusting the angle on the exhaust cam--adjustable after market gear? Or are you just "retarding" it manually for testing clearances? I've heard of some people using the non-vtec exhaust cam gear because it's much lighter than the one off the vtec head. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks for sharing the progress!
Thanks for sharing the progress!
#53
Re: My K20 rebuild
Looking good! When you got those cams was there any info on how they were different from earlier versions? Different lift/duration or just different profile to allow a higher red line maybe? Also, you may have mentioned this already, but how are you adjusting the angle on the exhaust cam--adjustable after market gear? Or are you just "retarding" it manually for testing clearances? I've heard of some people using the non-vtec exhaust cam gear because it's much lighter than the one off the vtec head. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks for sharing the progress!
Thanks for sharing the progress!
great thread. its a welcome break from the usual "why doesnt my stock B16 with M24xx run well?" threads.
#54
Re: My K20 rebuild
it was on some guys cigerrette boat
#56
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Looking good! When you got those cams was there any info on how they were different from earlier versions? Different lift/duration or just different profile to allow a higher red line maybe? Also, you may have mentioned this already, but how are you adjusting the angle on the exhaust cam--adjustable after market gear? Or are you just "retarding" it manually for testing clearances? I've heard of some people using the non-vtec exhaust cam gear because it's much lighter than the one off the vtec head. Any thoughts on that?
Thanks for sharing the progress!
Thanks for sharing the progress!
Anyhow, I've really got to update this thread. The motor is actually running now. I should have her on the dyno soon enough.
#58
Honda-Tech Member
Re: My K20 rebuild
I've got my K2 8620 sheet, can you at least quote/PM me the gross numbers at .05" lift for a rough comparison of my Mark 2s? Or is that super secret squirrel data where a leak of such info is tantamount to a serious security infraction (punishable by up to $100K in fines and perhaps execution for treason), since the Chinreese might soon replicate the IPS übernuke-powered high CR K20 build cam angle/ramp rate geometry on the cheap and shame us all into mere low eleven passes at the strip? lol. Afterall there is a high degree of hush hush and exclusivity surrounding these items from my perspective.
Anyway thanks for sharing what you have on your build and good luck on the dyno.
Pirate, Who's looking forward to exercising 'is God-given American right to Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552. :D (I should lay off the sauce. Woot Friday!)
#59
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Yeah, Functionally they're supposed to be better. The greatest thing since sliced bread and a bigger better mousetrap. Nobody wants last year's technology. It's never functionally worse is it? lol.
I've got my K2 8620 sheet, can you at least quote/PM me the gross numbers at .05" lift for a rough comparison of my Mark 2s? Or is that super secret squirrel data where a leak of such info is tantamount to a serious security infraction (punishable by up to $100K in fines and perhaps execution for treason), since the Chinreese might soon replicate the IPS übernuke-powered high CR K20 build cam angle/ramp rate geometry on the cheap and shame us all into mere low eleven passes at the strip? lol. Afterall there is a high degree of hush hush and exclusivity surrounding these items from my perspective.
Anyway thanks for sharing what you have on your build and good luck on the dyno.
Pirate, Who's looking forward to exercising 'is God-given American right to Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552. :D (I should lay off the sauce. Woot Friday!)
I've got my K2 8620 sheet, can you at least quote/PM me the gross numbers at .05" lift for a rough comparison of my Mark 2s? Or is that super secret squirrel data where a leak of such info is tantamount to a serious security infraction (punishable by up to $100K in fines and perhaps execution for treason), since the Chinreese might soon replicate the IPS übernuke-powered high CR K20 build cam angle/ramp rate geometry on the cheap and shame us all into mere low eleven passes at the strip? lol. Afterall there is a high degree of hush hush and exclusivity surrounding these items from my perspective.
Anyway thanks for sharing what you have on your build and good luck on the dyno.
Pirate, Who's looking forward to exercising 'is God-given American right to Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552. :D (I should lay off the sauce. Woot Friday!)
Here's a short sound clip of the engine at high idle during the breakin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RD7KhxzWpig
There's a lot of bass in that exhaust. :p
#61
WestSPEC
iTrader: (17)
Re: My K20 rebuild
Yeah, Functionally they're supposed to be better. The greatest thing since sliced bread and a bigger better mousetrap. Nobody wants last year's technology. It's never functionally worse is it? lol.
I've got my K2 8620 sheet, can you at least quote/PM me the gross numbers at .05" lift for a rough comparison of my Mark 2s? Or is that super secret squirrel data where a leak of such info is tantamount to a serious security infraction (punishable by up to $100K in fines and perhaps execution for treason), since the Chinreese might soon replicate the IPS übernuke-powered high CR K20 build cam angle/ramp rate geometry on the cheap and shame us all into mere low eleven passes at the strip? lol. Afterall there is a high degree of hush hush and exclusivity surrounding these items from my perspective.
Anyway thanks for sharing what you have on your build and good luck on the dyno.
Pirate, Who's looking forward to exercising 'is God-given American right to Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552. :D (I should lay off the sauce. Woot Friday!)
I've got my K2 8620 sheet, can you at least quote/PM me the gross numbers at .05" lift for a rough comparison of my Mark 2s? Or is that super secret squirrel data where a leak of such info is tantamount to a serious security infraction (punishable by up to $100K in fines and perhaps execution for treason), since the Chinreese might soon replicate the IPS übernuke-powered high CR K20 build cam angle/ramp rate geometry on the cheap and shame us all into mere low eleven passes at the strip? lol. Afterall there is a high degree of hush hush and exclusivity surrounding these items from my perspective.
Anyway thanks for sharing what you have on your build and good luck on the dyno.
Pirate, Who's looking forward to exercising 'is God-given American right to Title 5 of the United States Code, section 552. :D (I should lay off the sauce. Woot Friday!)
#63
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Finally got around to doing some street tuning. The K2 Mark III primary map looks totally different from what I'm used to seeing on the old iron core K2 maps. There's a lot more fuel going in as well. I haven't had a chance to start street tuning the VTEC lobe yet, but things look promising thus far. I cannot wait to get her fully tuned.
Also, a smoothly tuned part throttle map makes such a huge difference in normal driving. The car is much smoother transitioning on and off the throttle now.
Also, a smoothly tuned part throttle map makes such a huge difference in normal driving. The car is much smoother transitioning on and off the throttle now.
#65
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: land of the sheep, home of the hypocrite
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: My K20 rebuild
That is surprising. IPS must have made some significant changes then. It's nice when you have to add fuel to the tables after making changes to the hardware; should make for a good day at the dyno. How is the piston slap after all your careful measurements? Thanks for the update and good luck with the high cam tuning and dyno!
#66
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Jacksonville, nc
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: My K20 rebuild
It seems you guys are blown away by the engineering put into this, hey me to! But to read another great write up check out this RWD H22 integra that this guy has built up.
http://www.team-integra.net/forum/di...TopicID=106670
http://www.team-integra.net/forum/di...TopicID=106670
#68
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
That is surprising. IPS must have made some significant changes then. It's nice when you have to add fuel to the tables after making changes to the hardware; should make for a good day at the dyno. How is the piston slap after all your careful measurements? Thanks for the update and good luck with the high cam tuning and dyno!
It seems you guys are blown away by the engineering put into this, hey me to! But to read another great write up check out this RWD H22 integra that this guy has built up.
http://www.team-integra.net/forum/di...TopicID=106670
http://www.team-integra.net/forum/di...TopicID=106670
http://www.supertechperformance.com/
I bought mine from http://www.vpfab.com/
#69
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Some preliminary numbers & vids are up.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/showth...3#post37650753
Thanks to mainstream performance & vteckidd
Car made 236 SAE and 242 STD. I don't have torque numbers b/c the RPM pickup on the dyno was acting funny. There's definitely more power in there. The tune needs some work and I've still got some things I need to dial in mechanically. I'm also still waiting on the Hytech header, which is when I'll do the full tune.
https://honda-tech.com/forums/showth...3#post37650753
Thanks to mainstream performance & vteckidd
Car made 236 SAE and 242 STD. I don't have torque numbers b/c the RPM pickup on the dyno was acting funny. There's definitely more power in there. The tune needs some work and I've still got some things I need to dial in mechanically. I'm also still waiting on the Hytech header, which is when I'll do the full tune.
#70
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Long time no update. Motor has crossed 3k miles, no issues to speak of. I've kind of held off on really dialing in the tune because I'm still waiting on the Hytech header, which will go on with a 2.5" exhaust.
All the exhaust parts are here pretty much. Just waiting on the header.
All the exhaust parts are here pretty much. Just waiting on the header.
#72
Honda-Tech Member
Thread Starter
Re: My K20 rebuild
Just thought I'd update this thread with my latest progress. I ditched the old 3" exhaust and went with a new 2.5". Check it out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJG7KTGeaQM
Fancy oval tip. Not perfectly centered, but pretty close. Had to make some concessions b/c of how the muffler was angled in the underbody cavity.
I wanted to have the muffler before the rear suspension.
The benefit is no weight hanging off the rear of the car. Just a void where most mufflers go. You can see the band clamp used here over a slip fit joint. It was a tight fit, but it works with 2.5" pipe.
Again, a band clamp used on a slip fit joint. These are great for flow & ground clearance.
Check out that ground clearance. Way better than with my old 3" exhaust.
Again, big thanks to Charles @ Mainstream Performance for TIG welding it all up just the way I wanted it. It wasn't easy to make the bigass muffler work in that location, but he got it done.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJG7KTGeaQM
Fancy oval tip. Not perfectly centered, but pretty close. Had to make some concessions b/c of how the muffler was angled in the underbody cavity.
I wanted to have the muffler before the rear suspension.
The benefit is no weight hanging off the rear of the car. Just a void where most mufflers go. You can see the band clamp used here over a slip fit joint. It was a tight fit, but it works with 2.5" pipe.
Again, a band clamp used on a slip fit joint. These are great for flow & ground clearance.
Check out that ground clearance. Way better than with my old 3" exhaust.
Again, big thanks to Charles @ Mainstream Performance for TIG welding it all up just the way I wanted it. It wasn't easy to make the bigass muffler work in that location, but he got it done.
#74
Homosexual by choice
Re: My K20 rebuild
First, excellent work on looking up CTE, doing the math, and heating them up and measuring!
~230whp on dynojet with 12.5CR and IPS cams correct? Isn't that kind of low?
Unless I'm mistaken ENDYN's Wiseco RollerWaves are available in 4032 for NA use.
The Supertech has a wider skirt that is also a little longer. The crown of the piston is also a little thicker. The supertech piston also has less taper from the crown to the bottom of the skirt. This makes sense as it is constructed from an alloy that expands less as it heats up.
I had a conversation with a friend (who's built quite a # of engines himself) and he made these comments:
"That is exactly the reason why you don't make your strutted pistons too short. lol. shorter the better for skirts on girls, not always such a good thing for pistons. lol. you can have a whopping 5 grams of extra piston mass to gain a sh*t load of ring seal, ring lifespan, piston wear, etc."
"look where that CP piston was wearing total failure of piston design. it needs to be wearing about 1/4" up off the bottom of the lower skirt edge. NOT trying to stabilize just below the ring package... omg fail. actually, lol, you can see the wear pattern going right into the oil control ring lans. lol."
"That super tech piston is WAY better everything about it's design is better
and it's got like 2x the top ring lan strength it's going to cool better too."
Did you weight the pistons? What's the weight difference between the CP and SuperTech's? It'd be nice to know since they are both dome'd for 12.5:1 CR. It looks like the SuperTech's would be a little heavier.
Maybe it's the pictures quality or maybe it's just me. But I can't see how the CP has much nicer machining. Can you explain?
How many miles were on the stock piston? Do you have any photos of it?
After those photos you said the CP left very little to be desired... don't you mean a lot? If you feel the CP design is excellent, do you think the piston to wall was simply too great at .0036"? What was CP's recommendation originally?
I'm also hoping you have received the Hytech header by now and will give us an improved dyno graph. How is the SuperTech's holding up thus far? I figure you got a good 10-15k miles on it now?
So based on that experience, I decided that this time around I'd go for pistons made of a lower expansion alloy. The only off the shelf pistons for a k-series made of 4032 are the supertech.
The Supertech has a wider skirt that is also a little longer. The crown of the piston is also a little thicker. The supertech piston also has less taper from the crown to the bottom of the skirt. This makes sense as it is constructed from an alloy that expands less as it heats up.
"That is exactly the reason why you don't make your strutted pistons too short. lol. shorter the better for skirts on girls, not always such a good thing for pistons. lol. you can have a whopping 5 grams of extra piston mass to gain a sh*t load of ring seal, ring lifespan, piston wear, etc."
"look where that CP piston was wearing total failure of piston design. it needs to be wearing about 1/4" up off the bottom of the lower skirt edge. NOT trying to stabilize just below the ring package... omg fail. actually, lol, you can see the wear pattern going right into the oil control ring lans. lol."
"That super tech piston is WAY better everything about it's design is better
and it's got like 2x the top ring lan strength it's going to cool better too."
Did you weight the pistons? What's the weight difference between the CP and SuperTech's? It'd be nice to know since they are both dome'd for 12.5:1 CR. It looks like the SuperTech's would be a little heavier.
On the underside of the piston, it's again clear why CP costs more. It's got much nicer machining on the underside of the piston. Dual wrist pin oiling holes are present on the CP piston. The supertech piston does have a thicker skirt. The wrist pin is also shorter on the supertech piston. The CP piston will accommodate a much wider rod, although that doesn't matter much if you are using stock width crank journals.
I also measured the expansion at the piston crown. The aftermarket pistons generally expanded a good bit more along their thrust faces at the crown than along the wrist pin axis. The CP pistons were within 0.001" along each axis. the Supertech pistons had an average difference 0.006" between the two axes, with the longer axis being the thrust face of the piston. The stock pistons were slightly oval as well having a difference of 0.002" between the two axes, with the longer axis being the thrust face of the piston.
What I find interesting is that although the CP pistons were more round at the crown than the stock pistons, the stock pistons had much more even skirt wear. This highlights two factors that set apart truly great pistons from the rest.
1. having a truly round shape at temperature
2. having a skirt profile that matches the bore at temperature
What I find interesting is that although the CP pistons were more round at the crown than the stock pistons, the stock pistons had much more even skirt wear. This highlights two factors that set apart truly great pistons from the rest.
1. having a truly round shape at temperature
2. having a skirt profile that matches the bore at temperature
Now, I'm not sure how the Supertech pistons will stack up, but it would seem that the CP pistons left a little to be desired in the piston skirt profile. Makes you wonder why some companies charge $1600+ for a set of four pistons and what kind of intrinsic value is engineered into the product.
I'm also hoping you have received the Hytech header by now and will give us an improved dyno graph. How is the SuperTech's holding up thus far? I figure you got a good 10-15k miles on it now?
#75
Honda-Tech Member
Re: My K20 rebuild
Chunky- I've got the same dial more gauge as well as their mics but in the .0001 variants. Never done me wrong. My mics are dead nuts. And I would never use the dial bore gauge for overall measurements but its fine for zeroing on your mic and subsequently getting your clearances. I would assume you agree. And as others have said great thread.